S. V. NAGAEV
Unknown
Submitted 1957-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-195701.90165 | Translated from Russian

Abstract

Full Text

S. V. NAGAEV

ON SOME LIMIT THEOREMS FOR HOMOGENEOUS MARKOV CHAINS

(Presented by Academician A. N. Kolmogorov on 13 II 1957)

Let an abstract space (X) be given, and let (\mathcal F_x) be a (\sigma)-algebra of its subsets. Let (p(\eta,A)), (\eta \in X), (A \in \mathcal F_x), be the transition-probability function. In what follows we shall assume that there exists a stationary probability distribution (p(A)) such that, for some (\rho<1) and (c),

[
|p^{(n)}(\eta,A)-p(A)|<c\rho^n
\tag{1}
]

uniformly with respect to (\eta \in X) and (A \in \mathcal F_x), where (p^{(n)}(\eta,A)) is the probability of transition in (n) steps from state (\eta) to a state belonging to the set (A). The function (p(\eta,A)), together with the initial probability distribution (\pi(A)), determines a sequence (x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n,\ldots) of random variables connected in a homogeneous Markov chain, with

[
P(x_1\in A)=\pi(A),\qquad
P(x_n\in A)=\int_X p^{(n-1)}(\eta,A)\,\pi(d\eta).
\tag{2}
]

Let (f(\eta)) be a real function defined on (X) and measurable with respect to (\mathcal F_x).

Theorem 1. If

[
\int |f(\eta)|^2\,p(d\eta)<\infty,
]

[
\sigma^2=\lim_{n\to\infty} M\left[\frac1{\sqrt n}\sum_{m=1}^n\bigl(f(x_m)-Mf(x_m)\bigr)\right]>0
]

(the mathematical expectation is computed under the assumption that the initial distribution is stationary), then for any initial distribution (\pi(A))

[
\lim_{n\to\infty}
P\left{
\frac1{\sqrt n}\sum_{m=1}^n
\left(f(x_m)-\int_X f(\eta)\,p(d\eta)\right)<x
\right}
=
\frac1{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{x} e^{-u^2/2\sigma^2}\,du.
\tag{3}
]

This theorem is an analogue of the well-known theorem of P. Lévy, which states that if (x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n,\ldots) is a sequence of independent identically distributed random variables and (\sigma^2=Dx_i<\infty), then

[
\lim_{n\to\infty}
P\left(
\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i-na}{\sigma\sqrt n}<x
\right)
=
\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{x} e^{-u^2/2}\,du,
]

where (a) is the mathematical expectation of (\chi_i). Up to the present time the central limit theorem for a homogeneous Markov chain with an arbitrary set of states has been proved under the assumption that, for some (\delta > 0) ((^1,{}^2,{}^3)),

[
\int_X |f(\eta)|^{2+\delta} p(d\eta) < \infty .
]

Theorem 2. Let (u_1, u_2, \ldots, u_n, \ldots) be a sequence of independent random variables with common distribution function (F(x)) such that

[
F(x) = p(f(\eta) < x)
]

(here (p(A)) is the stationary distribution). If, for some sequence of constants (A_n) and (B_n > 0),

[
\lim_{n \to \infty} P \left( \frac{1}{B_n} \left( \sum_{m=1}^{n} u_m - A_n \right) < x \right) = V_\alpha(x),
]

where (V_\alpha(x)) is a stable law with characteristic exponent (\alpha), and if for some (0 < \nu \le 1)

[
\lim_{n \to \infty} n^{1/2} B_n^{-\nu} \sup_{\xi} \int_{|f(\eta)| < B_n \tau} |f(\eta)|^\nu p(\xi, d\eta) = 0,
\tag{4}
]

whatever (\tau > 0) may be, then, for an arbitrary initial distribution (\pi(A)),

[
\lim_{n \to \infty} P \left( \frac{1}{B_n} \left( \sum_{m=1}^{n} f(x_m) - A_n \right) < x \right) = V_\alpha(x).
\tag{4'}
]

Condition (4) is satisfied, for example, when for some (\varepsilon < \alpha/2) the moments

[
\int_X |f(\eta)|^{\alpha-\varepsilon} p(\xi, d\eta)
]

are uniformly bounded in (\xi).

Theorem 3. If, for some (0 < \alpha < 2),

[
\int_X |f(\eta)|^\alpha p(d\eta) < \infty,
]

then, for some choice of the constants (A_n) and for an arbitrary initial distribution,

[
\lim_{n \to \infty} P \left( \frac{1}{n^{1/\alpha}} \left( \sum_{m=1}^{n} f(x_m) - A_n \right) < x \right) = E(x),
\tag{5}
]

where (E(x)) is an improper law.

Corollary. If

[
\int_X |f(\eta)| p(d\eta) < \infty,
]

then the sequence (f(x_1), f(x_2), \ldots, f(x_n), \ldots) obeys the law of large numbers.

Let now (X) be a countable set ({\omega_i}) ((i = 1, 2, \ldots)) and

[
\beta = \inf_{(i,j)} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \min(p_{ik}, p_{jk}),
\tag{6}
]

where (p_{ik}) is the probability of transition from (\omega_i) to (\omega_k) in one step (the meaning of condition (6) is explained in ((^3))).

Assume further that all states (\omega_i) are essential and form a positive class ((^4)). In view of (6), this class consists of a single subclass. Let (f(\omega_j) = a + k_j h), where (a) is an arbitrary real number, (k_j) is an integer, and (h > 0).

Theorem 4. If the greatest common divisor (k_j) is equal to (1),

[
\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} f^2(\omega_j)p_j<\infty
]

and (\sigma>0) ((p_j) are the final probabilities; (\sigma) is defined in the same way as in Theorem 1), then, uniformly with respect to (s),

[
\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\frac{\sigma\sqrt n}{h}P_{\pi n}(s)-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-z_{ns}^2/2}\right)=0,
\tag{7}
]

where (P_{\pi n}) is the probability that

[
\sum_{m=1}^{n} f(x_m)=an+sh,
]

under the condition that the initial distribution is (\pi(A)), and

[
z_{ns}=\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt n}\left(an+sh-n\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} f(\omega_j)p_j\right).
]

Theorem 5. If the conditions of Theorem 4 are satisfied and, in addition, for some integer (k\geq 3) and some (\delta>0)

[
\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}|f(\omega_j)|^{k+\delta}p_{ij}

Submission history

S. V. NAGAEV