PHYSICS
Yu. V. VOROB'EV
Submitted 1958-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-195801.49387 | Translated from Russian

Abstract

Full Text

PHYSICS

Yu. V. VOROB'EV

ON THE POSSIBILITY OF INCREASING THE RESOLVING POWER OF AN EMISSION MICROSCOPE WITH THE AID OF AN ELECTRON MIRROR

(Presented by Academician A. A. Lebedev, March 7, 1958)

The resolving power of an emission microscope, as is known, is proportional to the intensity of the electric field at the cathode of the immersion objective of the microscope. The discharge arising between the electrodes of the objective at field intensities above 10–15 kV/mm practically limits the resolving power, which in existing emission microscopes reaches several hundred angstroms. The use of small aperture diaphragms has indeed made it possible to increase the resolving power somewhat; however, it still remains approximately an order of magnitude lower than the resolving power of transmission-type electron microscopes.

In the present work we shall show that, with the aid of an electron mirror used as a filter, it is possible to increase significantly the resolving power of an emission microscope.

Let us consider an emission electron microscope in which, after the projection lens, a plane electron mirror is installed perpendicular to the axis, throwing the image onto a screen. The optical scheme of an instrument of this type is presented in Fig. 1, where (k) is the cathode, (o) the objective, (n) the projector, (z) the mirror, and (e) the screen.

In calculating the resolving power we shall restrict ourselves to the case of a thermocathode. Let (dN) be the number of electrons which, per unit time, emerge from an element of the cathode (df_0) located on the axis of symmetry of the system. Let, further, the spread of these electrons in energies and in directions be equal, respectively, to (d\varepsilon) and (d\alpha). Then, according to the Maxwell–Boltzmann law, we have

[
dN = C e^{-\varepsilon/V_T}\varepsilon\, d\varepsilon \sin 2\alpha\, d\alpha,
\tag{1}
]

where (\varepsilon) is the initial energy of the electrons; (\alpha) is the initial inclination of the trajectories to the axis; (V_T = \dfrac{kT}{e} = \dfrac{T}{11600^\circ}\,\text{V}); (T) is the cathode temperature.

Suppose that the electron beam passing within the angle (d\alpha) penetrates an element (df = 2\pi r\,dr) of the image plane. Through this area, per unit time, there arrive (dN = j_z 2\pi r\,dr) electrons; (j_z) is the current density.

Since electrons fall on the electron mirror after passing through the objective and the projection lens, the electron beams have a very small aperture, and therefore the intrinsic aberrations of the electron mirror may be neglected.

The radius of the circle of confusion for an emission system in the image plane of particles with zero energy has the form ({}^{1})

[
r \simeq -\,\frac{\varepsilon}{E}\sin 2\alpha \cdot m,
]

whence, by the law of conservation of the number of particles, we obtain

[
d j_z=C'\frac{e^{-\varepsilon/V_T}\,d\varepsilon}
{\sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon^2}{E^2}m^2-r^2}},
\qquad
r \leqslant \frac{\varepsilon}{E}|m|;
]

[
d j_z=0,
\qquad
r>\frac{\varepsilon}{E}|m|.
]

If a potential (V_0) relative to the cathode is applied to the surface of the mirror, then only those electrons whose initial energy (\varepsilon

Submission history

PHYSICS