Physical Chemistry
P. P. Shorygin and Z. S. Egorova
Submitted 1958-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-195801.86175 | Translated from Russian

Full Text

Physical Chemistry

P. P. Shorygin and Z. S. Egorova

THE INFLUENCE OF SUBSTITUENTS ON THE PROPERTIES OF MOLECULES OF PARA-DISUBSTITUTED BENZENE

(Presented by Academician B. A. Kazanskii, 11 IX 1957)

The frequencies of more or less local vibrations of atoms in groups attached to the benzene ring change noticeably when a second substituent is introduced into the ring in the para position. Thus, the frequency of the valence vibration of the nitro group under the influence of substituents may change by 10–50 cm\(^{-1}\). These changes are apparently connected mainly with a change in the rigidity of the N—O bonds.

Absorption spectra and certain optical properties of aromatic compounds are more sensitive to the influence of substituents than are frequencies in vibrational spectra. Despite the difficulties in interpreting absorption spectra, in some cases it is possible to extract from them valuable information—not only about the excited state, but partly also about the ground state of molecules.

The use of various methods of investigation makes it possible to obtain a more many-sided picture of the mutual influence of atoms in complex molecules, and also makes it possible to check conclusions drawn on the basis of one method by other means. The latter is especially desirable because each of the methods has its own limitations and its own possible sources of errors and inaccuracies.

In the present work we studied the spectra and dipole moments of para derivatives of nitrobenzene \(X-\langle\!\!-\!\!\rangle-\mathrm{NO_2}\) with various substituents \(X\). The nitro group is among the most electronegative groups; signs of the influence of electropositive substituents are expressed especially distinctly in derivatives of nitrobenzene.

Table 1 gives the following quantities:

  1. The magnitudes of the shifts \((\Delta \omega)\) of the frequency of the valence symmetric vibration of the nitro group caused by the introduction of the substituent \(X\), according to measurements of Raman spectra in benzene solutions (the frequency of the nitro group of unsubstituted nitrobenzene in benzene solution, and also in cyclohexane solution, is equal to 1347.5 cm\(^{-1}\)).

  2. The coefficients of integral intensity of this line in Raman spectra, \(I_{\mathrm{NO_2}}\), measured in benzene solutions by the photographic method with excitation of the spectrum by the mercury line 4358 Å (the unit adopted is \(1/100\) of the intensity of the 313 cm\(^{-1}\) line of CCl\(_4\), calculated per 1 mole; accuracy ±10%).

  3. The characteristics of intense absorption bands in the ultraviolet region: wavelength \(\lambda\) in Å, values of \(\varepsilon/1000\), where \(\varepsilon\) is the molar (decadic) absorption coefficient at the band maximum, and oscillator strength \(f\) from measurements of solutions in heptane, as well as the difference \((\Delta \lambda_1)\) between the wavelengths of the intense absorption band of the compounds \(X-\langle\!\!-\!\!\rangle-\mathrm{NO_2}\) and PhNO\(_2\), according to measurements of benzene solutions. The spectra were measured with a photoelectric spectrophotometer SF-4.

Table 1

Group X in X—C₆H₄—NO₂ Δω_{NO₂}, cm⁻¹ I_{NO₂} UV spectra (in heptane) λ₁ ε₁/1000 f₁ λ₂ ε₂/1000 Δλ₁ in benzene Δμ σ_{para}
—H 0 700 2520 9.6 0.27 0 0 0
—SO₂R 3 ∼800 2470 11.5 0.34 0.6
—F 0 900 2580 8.5 0.23 ∼80 0.1 0.05
—CH₂Cl 0 1100 2580 12 0.31 ∼80 0.1 0.2
—CCl₃ 2550 14.5 0.4
—COOEt ∼0 2540 13.5 0.36 ∼50 0.5
—CHO ∼−2 1000 2580 16.5 0.41 ∼80 −0.1 0.4
—Cl ∼−1 ∼1300 2670 11 0.29 130 0.15 0.2
—Br ∼−3 ∼1300 2700 12 0.30 170 0.15 0.2
—R −2 1400 2650 10.2 0.28 130 0.1 −0.15
—CR₃ −2 1500 2650 10.5 0.29 130 0.1 −0.20
—C·N·R₂ −2 1600 2620 ∼9
—I 0 2700 2880 12.5 0.32 2210 8 340 0.4 0.3
—C≡C 2910 16 0.35 ∼0
—OH −5 3200 2850 10.5 0.26 2190 9 390 0.7 −0.35
—OPh −3ц ∼3200 2930 15 0.37 2200 14 420 0.6 −0.3
—OR −5 4000 2920 12 0.29 2200 9 460 0.45 −0.3
—SH −7.5 5700 3050 12.7 0.32 2240 6 560 0.1
—Ph −1.5 5500 2940 18 0.45 2220 12 440 0.3 ∼0
—R·CHO −6 5500 3040 12 0.35 2240 10 540
—SR −8 16000 3260 15 0.30 2200 ∼7 780 0.6 −0.05
—C=C—Ph −4.5ц 20000 3300 19 0.52 2370 13 720 0.5
—NHCOR 3000 15 ∼2200 12 ∼0
—NH₂ −12 20000 3190 15 0.37 2260 8 820 1.0 −0.65
—N⋯Ph 3250 24 0.64 2140 13 0.4 0.6
—NH·NH·Ph −16 38000 3250 15 0.45 2300 14 890
—NHNH₂ −20 45000 3450 17 0.43 ∼2200 8 870 ∼2 −0.6
—NH·Ph ∼−12ц 3530 21 0.42 2350 8 0.8
—NR₂ −28 170000 3540 20 0.41 2260 8 1210 1.4 −0.7
ferrocenyl— ∼−10 3900 4 0.06 2800 11
ferrocenyl— ∼−10 3120 16 0.37 2800 11

Notes. 1. H atoms at carbon in the formulas are omitted; R is a methyl group; λ₁ of unsubstituted nitrobenzene in benzene solution is ∼2620 Å. The data for the ∼2200 Å band are considerably less reliable than those for the neighboring bands. Weak absorption bands were not taken into account. Figures with the letter “ц” were obtained by measurements of cyclohexane solutions. The NO₂ frequency in compounds with X = Cl, Br, NH·Ph, CHO, COOEt is split into 2 components; the table gives their total intensity and an intermediate value of the frequency.

  1. Nitrodiphenyl, nitrohydrazobenzene, nitroazobenzene, nitroamines, and some other compounds were synthesized by T. I. Ambush and M. A. Geiderikh; p-nitrophenylferrocene was kindly provided by A. N. Nesmeyanov and R. V. Golovnya; the authors take this opportunity to express their gratitude to them.

  2. The difference (Δμ) between the observed value of the dipole moment of X—C₆H₄—NO₂ and the vector sum of the moments of X—C₆H₅ and C₆H₅—NO₂ (in debyes, according to literature data on dipole moments in benzene); Δμ characterizes the additional displacement of electrons (in the direction from X to NO₂) associated with the simultaneous presence of two substituents: X and NO₂.

  3. Hammett constants σ_{para}, determined chiefly from the dissociation constants of X—C₆H₄—COOH.

Characterizing the dependence of the properties of compounds X—C₆H₄—NO₂ on the type of substituents X, we note that electropositive and electronegative substituents affect reactivity in opposite directions, but the optical properties (\(I_{\mathrm{NO}_2}\), λ₁, \(f_1\), and polarizability) in the same direction.

In all cases, in X—C₆H₄—NO₂ molecules the influence of electropositive substituents is much stronger than that of electronegative substituents (in X—C₆H₄—NR₂ molecules, the reverse is true).

Fig. 1 qualitatively shows the tendency that is emerging in the relationship between the quantities \(I_{\mathrm{NO_2}}\), \(\lambda_1\), \(\omega_{\mathrm{NO_2}}\) in the molecules \(X-\langle\text{benzene ring}\rangle-\mathrm{NO_2}\), the constants \(\sigma_{\mathrm{para}}\) of the substituents \(X\), and the anomalies in the dipole moments of PhX compounds \((\Delta\mu_{\mathrm{phx}})\), according to the data of \((^1)\).

The points corresponding to the values of \(I\) and \(\lambda\) for the substituents \(\mathrm{C_6H_5}\cdot\) and \(\mathrm{CH_2:CH}\cdot\) lie considerably above the curves shown; such substituents have little effect on the dipole moments and chemical properties, and strongly affect the optical properties.

Alkyl groups \(X\) affect the dipole moments of nitro compounds as weakly electropositive groups. The differences between the studied parameters of molecules (Table 1) with branched and unbranched alkyl groups do not exceed the possible experimental error. The differences in the constants \(\sigma\) are more substantial; however, it should not be forgotten that these quantities are of a very approximate character. Values of \(\sigma\), often cited in the literature to three decimal places, may in this respect easily be misleading and create the impression of great possibilities for an exact and independent characterization of substituents.

In any case, the transition from \(-\mathrm{CH_3}\) to \(-\mathrm{CMe_3}\) is associated with very slight changes in the signs of the mutual influence of groups. The effect of methylation increases in the series \(\mathrm{CH_3}<\mathrm{OH}<\mathrm{SH}<\mathrm{NH_2}\).

In molecules \(Z\cdot\mathrm{NH}-\langle\text{benzene ring}\rangle-\mathrm{NO_2}\), the effect of \(Z\) on the spectra is similar to the effect of the same substituents in molecules \(Z-\langle\text{benzene ring}\rangle-\mathrm{NO_2}\), but is expressed more weakly. The influence of similar substituents \(Z\) through the bridges \(\cdot\mathrm{CH_2}\cdot\) and \(\cdot\mathrm{CH_2}\cdot\mathrm{CH_2}\cdot\) is very small.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

The sequences of electronegative substituents arranged according to the degree of their influence on the dipole moments, the frequency and intensity of the nitro-group line, the absorption spectra, the exaltation of refraction (and also according to the values of the constants \(\sigma_{\mathrm{para}}\)) are very similar. In individual cases discrepancies are observed; in part, they are explained by differences in experimental conditions (differences in solvents, etc.). Unfortunately, it is difficult to achieve complete uniformity in the measurement conditions. However, differences in experimental conditions are not the main cause of such discrepancies. It may be noted that the OH group affects dipole moments more strongly than OR, whereas for optical properties the reverse is true. Substantial differences between the effects of substituents on chemical and physical properties may be noted in a number of compounds (for example, at \(X=\mathrm{SH}\), \(\mathrm{SR}\), \(\mathrm{C:C}\), \(\mathrm{C:C\cdot Ph}\)).

A more complete correspondence is observed in the signs of the effect of substituents on various optical properties of the molecules \(X-\langle\text{benzene ring}\rangle-\mathrm{NO_2}\). In monosubstituted benzenes, PhX, on the contrary, significant discrepancies were observed \((^1)\). This is connected with the fact that in \(X\cdot\mathrm{C_6H_4}\cdot\mathrm{NO_2}\) compounds (unlike PhX) there is a nearby intense absorption band whose influence on the optical properties dominates.

Judging from the data on the dependence of \(I_{\mathrm{NO_2}}\) on the frequency of the incident light and on the dispersion of the refractive index, it may be concluded that the nearby intense absorption band of para derivatives of nitrobenzene, lying in the region 2500–3500 Å, mainly determines the intensity of the nitro-group line and the dispersion. According to calculation, in \(p\)-nitroaniline it determines by 90% the observed dispersion in the region 4500–5500 Å and the exaltation of refraction associated with the introduction of the amino group (\(\sim 8\ \mathrm{cm^3}\)).

The differences in the intensity of the Raman line of \(\mathrm{NO_2}\) in various compounds
\(\mathrm{X}-\langle\!\!-\!\!\rangle-\mathrm{NO_2}\) are greater than follows from the relation \(I \sim (\nu_1^2-\nu^2)^{-2}\) and, as is seen from Fig. 2, smaller than follows from the expression

\[ I \sim \nu_1^2 f_1^2(\nu_1^2-\nu^2)^{-4}. \tag{1} \]

These relations are obtained by differentiating the expression for the polarizability

\[ \alpha=\mathrm{const}\cdot \sum_e \frac{f_e}{\nu_e^2-\nu^2} \]

with respect to the nuclear coordinate:

\[ \frac{\partial \alpha}{\partial Q} = \mathrm{const}\sum_e \frac{1}{\nu_e^2-\nu^2}\frac{\partial f_e}{\partial Q} - \frac{2\nu_e f_e}{(\nu_e^2-\nu^2)^2}\frac{\partial \nu_e}{\partial Q} \]

(\(\nu\) is the frequency of the incident light, \(e\) is the index of the electronic level).

Formula (1) describes more or less satisfactorily the dependence of \(I_{\mathrm{NO_2}}\) on \(\nu\) (at constant \(\nu_1\), i.e., for one and the same compound), but, as is seen from Fig. 2, gives large deviations when \(\nu_1\) changes under conditions of constant \(\nu\) (i.e., in a series of nitro compounds with different \(\nu_1\), when the spectrum is excited by one and the same frequency \(\nu\)). If differences in the anisotropy of the scattering tensors are taken into account, the deviations are still more considerable.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

These deviations do not have the character of a completely random scatter of points; one can note a gradually increasing deviation from the straight line. Within the framework of a semiclassical treatment of combinational scattering, this deviation may be attributed to a decrease, in the series of nitro compounds, of the quantity \(\partial \nu_e/\partial Q\) (in compounds with especially close absorption bands, damping may also have an effect).

By an approximate estimate, the derivative of the polarizability of the molecule with respect to the nuclear coordinate \(q_{\mathrm{N-O}}\) for the symmetric vibration of the nitro group of p-nitroaniline is about \(100\ \text{\AA}^2\). If it is assumed that

\[ \frac{\partial \alpha_X}{\partial q} = -14\cdot 10^9 f_1 \nu_1(\nu_1^2-\nu^2)^{-2} \frac{\partial \nu_1}{\partial q} \ \text{\AA}^2, \]

and that the absorption band is polarized in the direction \(X\) (substituting \(3\cdot 0.37\) for \(f_1\)), then the derivative \((\partial \nu_1/\partial q)_0\) should have an order of magnitude of \(-20000\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}/\text{\AA}\); such a value is quite possible with changes in the equilibrium distances between the N and O atoms upon electronic excitation by an amount of the order of \(0.03\)–\(0.1\ \text{\AA}\).

Physicochemical Institute
named after L. Ya. Karpov,

N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry
Academy of Sciences of the USSR

Received
27 VI 1957

CITED LITERATURE

  1. P. P. Shorygin, Z. S. Egorova, DAN, 117, No. 5 (1957).

Submission history

Physical Chemistry