V. V. ANDREEVA and E. A. ALEKSEEVA
Unknown
Submitted 1960-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196001.30840 | Translated from Russian

Abstract

Full Text

V. V. ANDREEVA and E. A. ALEKSEEVA

THIN OXIDE FILMS ON TITANIUM, ZIRCONIUM, MOLYBDENUM, AND TITANIUM ALLOYS

(Presented by Academician A. N. Frumkin, April 28, 1960)

A large number of works ((^{1-3})) have been devoted to the question of the oxidation of titanium, zirconium, and molybdenum at temperatures above (300^\circ). But very little information is available on the oxidation of these metals in the temperature range (20)—(300^\circ). The aim of the present investigation was also to study the kinetics of oxidation of Ti, Zr, Mo, a Ti alloy with 10% Mo, and a Ti alloy with 3% Al and 5% Cr, specifically in the temperature range (50)—(400^\circ).

In the investigations the previously described ((^{1,4,5})) optical polarization method was used for measuring the thicknesses of thin invisible films forming on metals; it is based on the study of the character of the ellipticity of light reflected from the surface under investigation. The initial surface was taken to be the surface of the metal specimen after polishing and thorough degreasing (in a Soxhlet apparatus). Thus the subsequent oxidation at specified elevated temperatures led to the thickening of the already existing “natural” oxide film on the surface of the metal, which was not taken into account in the calculation of the thickness measurements. Oxidation was carried out in a tube furnace in a stream of oxygen. The duration of the oxidation process for each temperature was 6 hr. Measurements of film growth were made every 60 min; for this purpose the specimens were removed from the furnace and rapidly cooled. After the measurement was completed, the specimens were again placed in the furnace. The entire oxidation cycle for the whole temperature range ((50)—(400^\circ)) was carried out on the same specimen.

Fig. 1. Change in film thickness as a function of temperature and oxidation time: 3 — Ti alloy with 10% Mo, 4 — Ti alloy with 5% Cr and 3% Al, 5 — Ti

Fig. 1. Change in film thickness as a function of temperature and oxidation time: 3 — Ti alloy with 10% Mo, 4 — Ti alloy with 5% Cr and 3% Al, 5 — Ti

Figures 1 and 2 give the results of measurements (the mean of several determinations) of the growth of the oxide film on the metals and alloys studied as a function of time. Table 1 summarizes the values of the oxide-film thickness after a 6-hour oxidation cycle of the specimens studied.

The data obtained show that oxidation becomes noticeable at (50^\circ) for Zr, at (100^\circ) for Ti and the alloy Ti + 10% Mo, and at (150^\circ) it is also noticeable for Mo and the alloy Ti + 5% Cr + 3% Al. On examining the curves presented, it can be seen that at the initial temperatures of the investigation, for all the metals and alloys studied, the oxidation rate, rapid at first, practically falls to zero and oxidation ceases when the forma-

...the forming layer of the reaction product reaches a certain limiting thickness. In this case, the change in the thickness of the oxide film with time can be expressed mathematically by a logarithmic equation:

[
L = k \lg (k_1 t + k_2).
\tag{1}
]

Plotting the thickness of the oxide layer as a function of the logarithm of time gives a straight line.

Fig. 2. Change in film thickness as a function of oxidation temperature and time: 1 — Zr, 2 — Mo

Fig. 2. Change in film thickness as a function of oxidation temperature and time: 1 — Zr, 2 — Mo

Fig. 3. Change in oxidation rate with temperature: 1 — Al, 2 — Cr, 3 — Ti, 4 — Zr, 5 — Mo, 6 — Ti alloy with 5% Cr and 3% Al, 7 — Ti alloy with 10% Mo

Fig. 3. Change in oxidation rate with temperature: 1 — Al, 2 — Cr, 3 — Ti, 4 — Zr, 5 — Mo, 6 — Ti alloy with 5% Cr and 3% Al, 7 — Ti alloy with 10% Mo

Upon transition to higher temperatures, when the slope of the film-thickness/time curves begins to change, the oxidation rate obeys a parabolic dependence

[
L^2 = k_3 t.
\tag{2}
]

The stability of the surface oxides decreases as the temperature rises, and the oxidation rate is determined by the rate of diffusion of ions in the crystal lattice of the oxide. In this case a linear dependence is obtained if the film thickness is plotted against the square root of time. In both equations (1) and (2), (L) denotes the thickness of the oxide film, and (t) is time.

Table 1 shows the temperature ranges within which, for each metal and alloy studied, one of the above laws of the oxide growth rate was established.

After certain temperatures, different for different metals, have been reached, the oxidation rate increases rapidly (Fig. 3). For Zr and Mo, rapid film growth is observed after 200°; for the Ti + 10% Mo alloy, for Ti, and for the Ti + 5% Cr + 3% Al alloy—after 350°.* Noteworthy is the—

* The chromium and aluminum oxidation curves shown in Fig. 3 are taken for comparison from the data of T. N. Krylova ((^9)).

the fact that within the range 200–400°, despite the sharp increase in the oxidation rate of Mo, the oxidation rate of the Ti alloy with 10% Mo is lower than that of Ti.

The composition of the oxide film on titanium, obtained in an atmosphere of oxygen or air at temperatures not exceeding 800°, is TiO₂ with the rutile structure (⁶, ¹¹, ¹²). At oxidation temperatures above

Table 1

Metal, alloy at 50° at 100° at 150° at 200° at 250° at 300° at 350° at 400° Composition of the oxide films at room temperature Activation energy of the oxidation process, kcal/mol
Titanium (iodide) no change logarithmic logarithmic parabolic parabolic parabolic parabolic parabolic TiO₂ (rutile) (⁶) 250–300°
10 000
Zirconium (iodide) logarithmic logarithmic logarithmic parabolic parabolic parabolic parabolic parabolic ZrO₂, cubic lattice up to 250°C with transition to monoclinic as the temperature is increased (⁷) 200–250°
21 200
Molybdenum (technical) no change no change parabolic parabolic parabolic parabolic parabolic parabolic MoO₃ up to 300°; above 300°—MoO₃ and MoO₂ (⁸) 150–300°
20 000
Titanium + 10% molybdenum no change logarithmic logarithmic parabolic parabolic parabolic parabolic parabolic apparently, a solid solution of TiO₂ and x MoO₃ 200–350°
12 000
Titanium + 3% aluminum + 5% chromium no change no change logarithmic logarithmic logarithmic logarithmic parabolic parabolic apparently, a solid solution of TiO₂, x Cr₂O₃ and y Al₂O₃

800° the formation of layered films is observed, consisting of a TiO layer adjacent to the metal—oxide boundary, a middle layer of Ti₂O₃, and an outer TiO₂ layer at the oxide—gas boundary. The composition of the oxide film on zirconium when it is oxidized in oxygen at temperatures not exceeding 250–300° is ZrO₂ with a cubic structure; at 250° and above a textured monoclinic modification arises (⁷). The increase in the oxidation rate observed at 250–300° is associated with the growth of the monoclinic modification of ZrO₂. At temperatures up to 300° the film on molybdenum is MoO₃. In the temperature interval 300–700°, along with MoO₃, MoO₂ also appears, apparently as a product of the dissociation of MoO₃ according to the reaction:

[
2\mathrm{MoO}_3 \rightarrow 2\mathrm{MoO}_2 + \mathrm{O}_2,
]

with subsequent preferential oxidation of molybdenum only to MoO₂. This phenomenon explains the minimum on curve 2 in Fig. 2, which occurs during oxidation of molybdenum at 350°.

On chromium and aluminum, the films formed in air at various temperatures consist only of the oxides Cr₂O₃ and Al₂O₃, respectively (⁸, ¹⁰).

Plotting (\lg k) as a function of (1/T) gives a straight line. From the slope of the straight line obtained for each metal and alloy studied, the values of the activation energy of the oxidation process were calculated (see Table 1). The reported activation-energy values show that the process of interaction of Zr and Mo with oxygen proceeds by one and the same mechanism; the latter differs somewhat from the mechanism of the process of interaction of Ti and its alloy with Mo (10%), whose behavior is also similar to one another. This can possibly be explained by the fact that, apparently, on the Ti alloy with 10% Mo a mixed oxide is formed, representing a solid solution of (\mathrm{TiO_2}) and (x\mathrm{MoO_3}). The formation of a mixed oxide may be favorable to some extent, since its relatively high heat of formation will cause a decrease in the vapor pressure of (\mathrm{MoO_3}). In addition, if the oxide is mixed, then (\mathrm{Mo^{6+}}) ions will replace (\mathrm{Ti^{4+}}) ions in the (\mathrm{TiO_2}) lattice, and replacement of an ion in the lattice by an ion of higher valence and of the same radius (ionic radii: (\mathrm{Ti^{4+}} = 0.64\ \text{Å}); (\mathrm{Mo^{6+}} = 0.68\ \text{Å})) should lead to a decrease in the number of vacant oxygen-ion sites, owing to the appearance of an additional number of free electrons, since titanium dioxide is a semiconductor with electronic conductivity. Thus, in this case the addition of molybdenum to titanium will not impair its heat resistance but, on the contrary, may even improve it somewhat, as we observe. As for the Ti alloy with 5% Cr and 3% Al, its significantly higher resistance to oxidation, compared with titanium, can possibly be explained by the formation of a mixed oxide ((\mathrm{TiO_2}, \mathrm{Al_2O_3}, \mathrm{Cr_2O_3})) of the spinel type. And, as is known, lattices of this type possess high resistance to oxidation.

Fig. 4. Change in film thickness with titanium oxidation temperature: 1 — in air saturated with water vapor; 2 — in dry air

Fig. 4. Change in film thickness with titanium oxidation temperature: 1 — in air saturated with water vapor; 2 — in dry air.

Figure 4 shows the oxidation curves of titanium in the interval (50\text{—}250^\circ) in dry air and in air saturated with water vapor. From Fig. 4 it is seen that the thickness of the film formed on titanium at temperatures up to (200^\circ) in dry air is twice as great as in humid air. At (250^\circ), when the bond with water becomes weak, the film thickness reaches one and the same value both in dry and in humid air. The hydrated film, apparently, is more compact and contains fewer defects than the film formed in dry air.

Institute of Physical Chemistry
Academy of Sciences of the USSR

Received
28 IV 1960

REFERENCES

  1. V. V. Andreeva, Tr. Inst. fiz. khim. AN SSSR, 2, issue 6 (1957).
  2. V. V. Andreeva, N. A. Shishakov, ZhFKh, 32, issue 7 (1958).
  3. N. A. Shishakov, V. V. Andreeva, N. K. Andryushenko, Structure and mechanism of formation of oxide films on metals, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1959.
  4. V. V. Andreeva, Institute of Techno-Economic Information, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, topic 9, No. PS-55-503, 1955.
  5. V. V. Andreeva, V. I. Gavrilov, Tr. Inst. fiz. khim., issue 3, Studies on the corrosion of metals, issue 2 (1951).
  6. P. Kofstad, K. Hauffe, Zs. Werkstoffe u. Korrosion, 2, 642 (1956).
  7. E. S. Sarkisov, N. T. Chebotarev, A. A. Nevzorova, A. I. Zverkov, Atomic Energy, 5, issue 5 (1958).
  8. J. Hickman, E. Gulbransen, Trans. Am. Inst. of Mining and Metallurg. Eng., 171, 344 (1947).
  9. T. N. Krylova, Izv. AN SSSR, OTN, 89 (1938).
  10. E. A. Gulbransen, J. Phys. and Coll. Chem., 51, No. 5, 1087 (1947).
  11. D. I. Lainer, M. I. Tsypin, Zav. lab., No. 10 (1959).
  12. D. I. Lainer, M. I. Tsypin, Izv. AN SSSR, OTN, No. 5 (1959).

Submission history

V. V. ANDREEVA and E. A. ALEKSEEVA