Full Text
MATHEMATICS
V. EGOROV
ON UNIFORMLY CONTINUOUS MAPPINGS OF UNIFORM COMPLEXES INTO A SPHERE
(Presented by Academician P. S. Aleksandrov, 11 VI 1960)
The present note is devoted to a generalization of the well-known classification theorem of Hopf for mappings of \(n\)-dimensional polyhedra into the \(n\)-sphere. Below we set forth facts that make it possible to classify uniformly continuous mappings of uniform triangulations* of dimension \(n\) into the \(n\)-sphere.
Basic definitions. A chain \(x=\sum \alpha_i T_i\) of a complex \(K\) will be called uniform if, for every \(i\), the inequality \(\alpha_i<\alpha\)** holds, where \(\alpha\) is a constant independent of \(i\). A \(\nabla\)-cycle will be called uniformly homologous to zero if it is the \(\nabla\)-boundary of some uniform chain. Uniform \(\nabla\)-cycles, as well as uniform \(\nabla\)-cycles uniformly homologous to zero (of the same dimension), form groups. The quotient group of the uniform \(\nabla\)-cycles by the subgroup of cycles uniformly homologous to zero will be called the uniform \(\nabla\)-group of the complex \(K\) and denoted by the symbol \(\nabla_u^n(K)\). Uniformly continuous mappings \(f_0\) and \(f_1\) of a set \(A\) into a set \(B\) will be called uniformly homotopic if, in the direct product \((A,I)\) of the set \(A\) with the unit interval \(I\), there exists a uniformly continuous mapping \(F\) into \(B\), for every \(a\in A\), satisfying the condition \(F(a,0)=f_0(a)\), \(F(a,1)=f_1(a)\)***. The set of all uniformly continuous mappings of a set \(A\) into a set \(B\) decomposes into uniformly homotopic classes.
Main theorem. Between the set of elements of the group \(\nabla_u^n(\widetilde K^n)\) of a uniform complex \(K^n\) and the set of uniformly homotopic classes of the set of uniformly continuous mappings of the triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\) into the sphere \(S^n\) there exists a one-to-one correspondence.
Everything that follows is devoted to the proof of this fact.
Lemma 1. For every uniformly continuous mapping \(f\) of a uniform triangulation \(\widetilde K_1\) into a uniform triangulation \(\widetilde K_2\), there exist simplicial mappings (simplicial approximations) into \(\widetilde K_2\) of barycentric subdivisions of corresponding order of the triangulation \(\widetilde K_1\), uniformly homotopic to the mapping \(f\).
* A triangulation (or complex) is called uniform if: 1) the lengths of all its one-dimensional simplexes are bounded above; 2) the distances between any two simplexes of this triangulation that do not have common vertices are bounded below by some constant \(h>0\) (see the fundamental work on the theory of uniform complexes \((^1)\)).
** In this work all chains and, consequently, all cycles are assumed to be integral; thus all \(\alpha_i\) are integers.
*** By the symbol \((A,\theta)\) we denote the “layer” of the set \((A,I)\) corresponding to the numerical coordinate \(\theta\) \((0\leq \theta\leq 1)\); analogously, \((a,\theta)\in(A,I)\) is the point with coordinates \(a\in A\) and \(\theta\) \((0\leq \theta\leq 1)\).
This lemma follows from the following facts:
I. The stars of vertices (principal stars) of a uniform triangulation \(\widetilde K\) form a Lebesgue covering of the set \(\widetilde K\)* (see \((^2)\)).
II. Every simplicial mapping of a uniform triangulation \(\widetilde K_1\) into a uniform triangulation \(\widetilde K_2\) is uniformly continuous.
III. The barycentric subdivision of a uniform triangulation is itself a uniform triangulation.
IV. Suppose that on the “bases” \((A,0)\) and \((A,1)\) of the set \((A,I)\) there are defined mappings, respectively, \(f_0\) and \(f_1\) into \(E^N\), and that
\[
\rho[f_0(a,0); f_1(a,1)]<l
\]
(\(l\) is a constant and \(a\) is any point of \(A\)). If \(f_0\) and \(f_1\) are uniformly continuous, then the mapping \(F\) of the set \((A,I)\), defined as follows, is also uniformly continuous:
\[
\overrightarrow{OF}(a,\theta)=\overrightarrow{Of_0}(a,0)+\theta\,[\overrightarrow{Of_1}(a,1)-\overrightarrow{Of_0}(a,0)]
\]
(\(O\) is some fixed point of the space \(E^N\)).
Lemma 2. For every uniformly continuous mapping \(f\) of a uniform triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\) into the sphere \(S^n\), there exists a mapping of the triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\) into \(S^n\), uniformly homotopic to the mapping \(f\), which sends the \((n-1)\)-dimensional skeleton of the triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\) to a single point of the sphere \(S^n\).
We shall call such mappings special.
Let \(\varphi\) be a special uniformly continuous mapping of \(\widetilde K^n\) onto the oriented boundary \(S^n\) of some \((n+1)\)-dimensional simplex, and let \(\widetilde K^{\prime n}\) be a barycentric subdivision of the triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\) of such order that the image of each principal star of the triangulation \(\widetilde K^{\prime n}\) under the mapping \(\varphi\) is contained in some principal star of the triangulation \(S^n\). Define on \(\widetilde K^{\prime n}\) a simplicial approximation \(g\) uniformly homotopic to the mapping \(\varphi\). Under the mapping \(g\), the image of each oriented \(n\)-simplex \(T_i^n\in \widetilde K^{\prime n}\) will be a cycle \(\gamma_i S^n\) of the sphere \(S^n\). The \(\nabla\)-cycle
\[
Z_\varphi=\sum_i \gamma_i T_i^n
\]
of the complex \(K^n\) is called the degree of the mapping \(\varphi\). Let
\[
x^n=\sum_i \alpha_i T_i^n
\]
be a chain of the complex \(K^n\). The number
\[
\gamma_\varphi(x^n)=\sum_i \alpha_i\gamma_i
\]
is called the degree of the mapping of the chain \(x^n\)***.
Theorem 1. The degree of a uniformly continuous mapping of a uniform triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\) into the sphere \(S^n\) is a uniform \(\nabla\)-cycle.
Theorem 2. Every uniform \(\nabla\)-cycle \(Z^n\) of a uniform complex \(K^n\) determines a special uniformly continuous mapping of the triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\) into the sphere \(S^n\), and the cycle \(Z^n\) itself is the degree of this mapping.
Lemma 3. Let uniformly homotopic mappings \(f_0\) and \(f_1\) into the sphere \(S\) be defined on a subset \(B\) of a set \(A\). If one of these mappings, for example \(f_0\), has a uniformly continuous extension \(F_0\) to the set \(A\), then the mapping \(f_1\) also extends to some mapping \(F_1\) of the set \(A\) into the same sphere \(S\), uniformly homotopic to the mapping \(F_0\).
Theorem 3. If special mappings \(\varphi_0\) and \(\varphi_1\) of a uniform triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\) into the sphere \(S^n\) are uniformly homotopic, then the degrees of these mappings are uniformly homologous.
* A covering \(\lambda\) is called a Lebesgue covering if there exists a covering \(\{c_i\}\) such that the covering \(\{O(\eta,c_i)\}\) is inscribed in \(\lambda\), \(\eta>0\).
** The reality of such an assumption is guaranteed by the uniformity of the triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\) and the uniform continuity of the mapping \(\varphi\).
*** \(\gamma_i\) does not depend on the choice of subdivisions (see, for example, \((^3)\)).
**** Only those chains are meant for which the degree defined in this way exists.
Indeed, represent the set \((\widetilde K^n,I)\) as a prism \(\Pi \widetilde K^n\) over the triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\), and on its bases \((\widetilde K^n,0)\) and \((\widetilde K^n,1)\) define respectively the mappings \(\varphi_0\) and \(\varphi_1\). Lemma 3 permits us to assume that the mapping \(\Phi\), which realizes a uniform homotopy of the mappings \(\varphi_0\) and \(\varphi_1\), sends the entire \((n-1)\)-dimensional skeleton of the prism \(\Pi \widetilde K^n\) to one point of the sphere \(S^n\). We define the \((n-1)\)-dimensional chain \(x^{n-1}\), which realizes a uniform homology of the degrees of the mappings \(\varphi_0\) and \(\varphi_1\), on each simplex \(T^{n-1}\in \widetilde K^n\) to be the degree of the mapping \(\gamma_\Phi(\Pi,T^{n-1})\) of the prism \(\Pi T^{n-1}\). Note that the uniform discontinuity of the mapping \(\Phi\) implies the uniformity of the chain constructed.
Theorem 4. If the degrees of uniformly continuous special mappings \(\varphi_0\) and \(\varphi_1\) of the uniform triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\) into \(S^n\) are uniformly homologous, then \(\varphi_0\) and \(\varphi_1\) are uniformly homotopic.
Proof. Consider the mapping of the sum of the upper and lower bases, coinciding with \(\varphi_0\) on the lower base and with \(\varphi_1\) on the upper. Next we construct a uniformly continuous extension to the prism over the \((n-1)\)-dimensional skeleton of the triangulation \(\widetilde K^n\). We extend the resulting mapping to the entire \(n\)-dimensional skeleton of the prism \(\Pi \widetilde K^n\) (denote this extension by \(\Phi\)). In this case the boundary of each simplex \(T_i^{n+1}\) of the prism \(\Pi \widetilde K^n\) is mapped into \(S^n\) inessentially, and the mapping \(\Phi\) sends the entire \((n-1)\)-dimensional skeleton of the prism \(\Pi K^n\) to one point. Construct for \(\Phi\) a simplicial approximation \(G\), based on a certain suitable barycentric subdivision of the \(n\)-dimensional skeleton of the prism \(\Pi \widetilde K^n\). Let \(T^n\) be some (for example, regular) complex whose boundary is subdivided by a barycentric subdivision of the same order as the \(n\)-dimensional skeleton of the prism \(\Pi \widetilde K^n\), and let \(T_i^{n+1}\) be an arbitrary simplex of the prism \(\Pi \widetilde K^n\). Assigning to the vertices of the simplex \(T_i^{n+1}\) bijectively the vertices of the simplex \(T^{n+1}\), to the center of gravity of the simplex \(T_i^{n+1}\) the center of gravity of the simplex \(T^{n+1}\), to the centers of gravity of the faces of the simplex \(T_i^{n+1}\) the centers of gravity of the corresponding faces of the simplex \(T^{n+1}\), and step by step doing the same for barycentric subdivisions of higher orders, we define linearly a simplicial homeomorphism \(u_i\) of the simplex \(T_i^{n+1}\) onto the simplex \(T^{n+1}\). Consider the system of mappings \(g_i=Gu_i^{-1}\) of the boundary of the simplex \(T^{n+1}\). This system splits into a finite number of classes, each of which contains identically coinciding mappings. The inessentiality of the mappings \(g_i\) permits each mapping \(g_i\) to be extended to a mapping \(\overline G_i\) into \(S^n\) of the entire simplex \(T^{n+1}\), and the system \(\{\overline G_i\}\) (just as \(\{g_i\}\)) contains only a finite number of essentially distinct classes, and therefore (just as \(\{g_i\}\)) is a uniformly continuous system of mappings. Putting, for every point \(a\in T_i^{n+1}\), \(F(a)=\overline G_i[u_i(a)]\), we obtain the required extension of the mapping \(G\) to the entire prism \(\Pi \widetilde K^n\). Applying Lemma 3, we uniformly continuously extend to \(\Pi K^n\) also the mapping \(\Phi\). The theorem is proved.
Thus, by assigning to each homotopy class the element of the group \(\nabla_u^n(K^n)\) containing the degree of some mapping from the given homotopy class, we construct the required one-to-one correspondence.
We express our gratitude to Prof. Yu. M. Smirnov, and also to V. Kuzmin, for the assistance rendered in writing this work.
Received
11 VI 1960
REFERENCES CITED
- Yu. M. Smirnov, Matem. sbornik, 40, No. 2, 137 (1956).
- V. I. Egorov, Matem. sbornik, 48, No. 2, 227 (1959).
- V. G. Boltyanskii, Trudy Mat. Inst. im. V. A. Steklova AN SSSR, 47 (1955).