Full Text
CHEMISTRY
V. F. MIRONOV, N. G. DZHURINSKAYA
and Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR A. D. PETROV
ADDITION OF HGeCl₃ TO HALOGEN-SUBSTITUTED ETHYLENES
DEHYDROCHLORINATION OF α,β-DICHLOROETHYLTRICHLOROGERMANE
In a previous work (¹) we established that trichlorogermane (HGeCl₃), unlike trichlorosilane (HSiCl₃), adds vigorously at room temperature to a variety of olefins and their derivatives without catalysts.
In the present investigation we studied the addition of HGeCl₃ to various chlorinated ethylenes (from ClCH = CH₂ to Cl₂C = CCl₂), to which the addition of HSiCl₃ is practically almost impossible. For example, the addition of methyldichlorosilane to vinyl chloride can be effected only in an autoclave at 160° and in the presence of a catalyst—platinum on carbon (²). However, even under these conditions the yield of α-chloroethylmethyldichlorosilane does not exceed 7% of theory
\[ \mathrm{ClCH{=}CH_2 + HSiCH_3Cl_2 \xrightarrow{Pt/C} CH_3ClCHSiCl_2CH_3.} \]
With still lower yields, despite the use of initiators and severe experimental conditions, addition of HSiCl₃ and CH₃Cl₂SiH to dichloroethylene, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene occurs (³,⁴). Meanwhile, trichlorogermane, as we have established in the present investigation, adds readily to the above-mentioned chloroethylenes without any catalysts.
For example, when vinyl chloride is bubbled through trichlorogermane, the addition proceeds with self-heating, which is also observed when trichlorogermane is mixed with dichloroethylene, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene. In the last case, however, the self-heating is barely noticeable.
The most unexpected result, however, is that in the interaction of vinyl chloride and trichlorogermane, not α-, but β-chloroethyltrichlorogermane was formed:
\[ \mathrm{ClCH{=}CH_2 + HGeCl_3 \rightarrow ClCH_2CH_2GeCl_3\ (33\%).} \]
In connection with this circumstance, we investigated the order of addition of HSiCl₃ to vinyl chloride. It turned out that HSiCl₃, despite the use of such a vigorous catalyst as chloroplatinic acid, just like CH₃Cl₂SiH, adds to vinyl chloride only in an autoclave, forming α-chloroethyltrichlorosilane in only 6% yield
\[ \mathrm{ClCH{=}CH_2 + HSiCl_3 \rightarrow Cl_3SiCHClCH_3.} \]
Thus it was established that trichlorogermane adds to vinyl chloride in a different order than trichlorosilane, which is probably connected with a different mechanism of the addition reaction of the two reagents. Cleavage of HCl from α,β-dichloroethyltrichlorogermane was carried out by us both with quinoline and with aluminum chloride.
Previously \((^{5,6})\), a similar elimination by both reagents was studied using the example of an analogous organosilicon compound \((\mathrm{Cl_3SiCHClCH_2Cl})\). It proved that in the present case as well the regularities noted earlier are preserved, i.e., quinoline eliminates the β-chlorine atom, whereas aluminum chloride eliminates the α-chlorine atom.
\[ \mathrm{Cl_3GeCHClCH_2Cl} \begin{array}{c} \xrightarrow{\mathrm{AlCl_3}} \mathrm{Cl_3GeCH{=}CHCl}\ (80\%)\\[4pt] \xrightarrow[\text{Quinoline}]{} \mathrm{Cl_3GeCCl{=}CH_2}\ (42\%). \end{array} \]
The mechanism of dehydrochlorination by aluminum chloride was at one time explained \((^{7,8})\) for α,β-dichloroalkyltrichlorosilanes by rearrangement of the β-carbonium ion formed, with migration of the trichlorosilyl group from the α-carbon atom to the β-carbon atom. It is probable that in the present case the same rearrangement mechanism occurs:
\[ \mathrm{Cl_3GeCHClCH_2Cl} \xrightarrow{\mathrm{AlCl_3}} \left[ \mathrm{Cl_3GeCHClCH_2^{\oplus} \to Cl^{\oplus}CH{-}CH_2GeCl_3} \right] \to \mathrm{Cl_3GeCH{=}CHCl}. \]
An attempt to eliminate HCl with quinoline from \(\mathrm{Cl_3SiCH_2CHClGeCl_3}\) led only to β-cleavage:
\[
\mathrm{Cl_3SiCH_2CHGeCl_3 \to SiCl_4 + CH_2{=}CHGeCl_3}.
\]
\[
\phantom{\mathrm{Cl_3SiCH_2CHGeCl_3}}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
\begin{array}{c}
|\\[-2pt]
\mathrm{Cl}
\end{array}
\]
The α- and β-chlorovinyltrichlorogermanes possess curious properties. α-Chlorovinyltrichlorogermane, after several hours, spontaneously polymerized into an opaque, solid substance of milky color. As is known, α-chloro(or bromo)vinyltrichlorosilanes behave analogously \((^{6,9})\).
β-Chlorovinyltrichlorogermane, like its silicon analogue \((^{5,9,10})\), on titration with a 0.1 \(N\) alkali solution saponifies all three chlorine atoms.
Table 1
| Compound | B.p., °C/mm | Yield, % | \(n_D^{20}\) | \(d_4^{20}\) | \(MR_D\) found | \(MR_D\) calc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| \(\mathrm{ClCH_2CH_2GeCl_3}\) * | 75/15 | 32.5 | 1.5092 | 1.7637 | 41.06 | 40.35 |
| \(\mathrm{ClCH_2{-}ClCHGeCl_3}\) | 88/12 | 62 | 1.5240 | 1.8390 | 46.07 | 45.20 |
| \(\mathrm{Cl_3C_2H_2GeCl_3}\) | 92/9 | 55.3 | 1.5341 | 1.9000 | 50.95 | 50.028 |
| \(\mathrm{CHCl_2{-}CCl_2GeCl_3}\) | 123/25 | 48 | 1.5378 | 1.9243 | 56.11 | 54.862 |
| \(\mathrm{CH_2{=}CClGeCl_3}\) | 151 | 41.6 | 1.5002 | — | — | — |
| \(\mathrm{CHCl{=}CHGeCl_3}\) | 164—165 | 80 | 1.5139 | 1.7690 | 40.92 | 40.88 |
* Literature data \((^{12,13})\): b.p. \(188^\circ\) (756), \(n_D^{20}\) 1.5094; \(d_4^{20}\) 1.7587.
of chlorine. Thus, here the cleavage with liberation of acetylene, which we expected and which is characteristic of quasi-complex compounds \((^{11})\) (for example: \(\mathrm{Cl_3PbCH{=}CHCl}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl_3SnCH{=}CHCl}\)), did not take place. The properties of the 5 germanium compounds synthesized for the first time are presented in Table 1.
Experimental Part
β-Chloroethyltrichlorogermane \(\mathrm{ClCH_2CH_2GeCl_3}\). A stream of vinyl chloride was passed for one hour through 15 g of trichlorogermane \((^{1})\). At first, strong heating was observed. After cooling, the contents of the flask were heated on a hot plate at \(80^\circ\) for another hour. Vacuum ...
By distillation, 6.5 g of β-chloroethyltrichlorogermane was isolated. B.p. 75° (15 mm). Yield 32.5%. The Raman spectra and the infrared spectrum completely coincide with those for β-chloroethyltrichlorogermane obtained earlier by another route \(^{12,13}\). Titration with 0.1 \(N\) NaOH, using phenolphthalein, of a sample of β-chloroethyltrichlorogermane in ~70% ethanol leads exactly to saponification of four chlorine atoms, but only over the course of a day.
α,β-Dichloroethyltrichlorogermane \(\mathrm{ClCH_2CHClGeCl_3}\). To 30 g of trans-dichloroethylene, with stirring, 54 g of trichlorogermane was added at such a rate that the temperature of the liquid did not rise above ~80°. The contents of the flask were then heated for half an hour at 80° and distilled under vacuum. 51 g of α,β-dichloroethyltrichlorogermane was obtained, b.p. 88° (12 mm). Yield 62%. With 0.1 \(N\) alkali, exactly four chlorine atoms were titrated.
Trichloroethyltrichlorogermane \(\mathrm{Cl_3GeC_2H_2Cl_3}\). Under the conditions of the preceding experiment, from 20 g of trichloroethylene and 27 g of trichlorogermane, 26 g of trichloroethyltrichlorogermane was obtained, b.p. 92° (9 mm). Yield 55.3%. Titration with 0.1 \(N\) alkali leads to saponification of 4 chlorine atoms.
Tetrachloroethyltrichlorogermane \(\mathrm{Cl_2CHCl_2CGeCl_3}\). After mixing 20 g of tetrachloroethylene and 18 g of trichlorogermane, heating of the contents of the flask at 80–90° was continued for 2 h. 16.5 g of tetrachloroethyltrichlorogermane was obtained, b.p. 123° (25 mm). Yield 48%. With 0.1 \(N\) alkali, four chlorine atoms were titrated.
α-Chlorovinyltrichlorogermane \(\mathrm{CH_2=CClGeCl_3}\). A mixture consisting of 27.7 g of α,β-dichloroethyltrichlorogermane and 13 g of quinoline was slowly distilled from a Favorskii flask up to ~200°. By redistillation of the condensate, 10 g of α-chlorovinyltrichlorogermane was isolated, b.p. 151° (753 mm). Yield 41.5%. Only three chlorine atoms were titrated.
β-Chlorovinyltrichlorogermane \(\mathrm{ClCH=CHGeCl_3}\). 20 g of α,β-dichloroethyltrichlorogermane with 0.2 g of aluminum chloride was slowly distilled from a Favorskii flask. By redistillation, 16 g of β-chlorovinyltrichlorogermane was isolated, b.p. 164–165°. Yield 80%. With 0.1 \(N\) alkali, exactly three chlorine atoms were titrated.
α-Chloroethyltrichlorosilane \(\mathrm{CH_3ClCHSiCl_3}\). In a 250-ml autoclave in a glass vessel were placed 68 g of \(\mathrm{HSiCl_3}\), 32 g of vinyl chloride, and 0.5 ml of \(\mathrm{H_2PtCl_6 \cdot 6H_2O}\) in isopropyl alcohol (0.1 \(N\) solution). Heating of the autoclave at 120° was continued for 4 h. On distillation, 19 g of ethyltrichlorosilane was isolated (b.p. 98–103°), whose Raman spectrum completely coincided with that reported in the literature. Yield 20% of theory. From the fraction with b.p. 136–139°, 6 g was obtained. Yield 6%. The Raman spectrum of this fraction corresponded to α-chloroethyltrichlorosilane; with 0.1 \(N\) alkali, three chlorine atoms were titrated. Ethyltrichlorosilane was apparently formed as a result of the following reactions:
\(\mathrm{Cl_3SiH + ClCH=CH_2 \rightarrow Cl_4Si + CH_2=CH_2}\);
\(\mathrm{CH_2=CH_2 + HSiCl_3 \rightarrow C_2H_5SiCl_3}\). The spectra were recorded by L. A. Leites.
Institute of Organic Chemistry
Academy of Sciences of the USSR
Received
23 XI 1959
CITED LITERATURE
- A. D. Petrov, V. F. Mironov, N. G. Dzhurinskaya, DAN, 128, 302 (1959).
- V. A. Ponomarenko, A. A. Sokolov, A. D. Petrov, Izv. AN SSSR, OKhN, 1956, No. 5, 628.
- L. Agry, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 300 (1949).
- E. T. McBee, C. W. Roberts, G. W. Puerckhauer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 79, 2326 (1957).
- A. D. Petrov, V. F. Mironov, D. Mashantsev, Izv. AN SSSR, OKhN, 1956, No. 5, 551.
- V. F. Mironov, A. D. Petrov, N. G. Maksimova, Izv. AN SSSR, OKhN, 1959, No. 11.
- V. F. Mironov, Chemistry and Practical Application of Organosilicon Compounds, 1958, issue 1, 148.
- V. F. Mironov, V. V. Nepomnina, Izv. AN SSSR, OKhN, 1960.
- L. H. Sommer, D. L. Bailey et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76, 1613 (1954).
- V. F. Mironov, V. G. Glukhovtsev, A. D. Petrov, DAN, 104, 865 (1955).
- K. A. Kocheshkov, I. F. Lutsenko, O. A. Reutov, Usp. Khim., 18, 497 (1949).
- V. F. Mironov, Yu. P. Egorov, A. D. Petrov, Izv. AN SSSR, OKhN, 1959, 1400.
- A. D. Petrov, V. F. Mironov, I. E. Dolgii, Izv. AN SSSR, OKhN, 1956, 1146.