MATHEMATICS
Yu. I. NEIMARK and V. N. GOLDBERG
Submitted 1960-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196001.95936 | Translated from Russian

Abstract

Full Text

MATHEMATICS

Yu. I. NEIMARK and V. N. GOLDBERG

EXISTENCE THEOREMS FOR NONLINEAR MIXED PROBLEMS

(Presented by Academician S. L. Sobolev on 9 VI 1960)

The establishment of conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions of nonlinear mixed problems is the subject, for example, of the works ((^{1-7})). Analogous questions for the Cauchy problem have been solved in the works ((^{8,9})). In the present paper, the approach proposed in ((^{11})) for justifying linearization in the study of stability is used to obtain existence theorems in general, uniqueness, continuous dependence, and differentiability with respect to a parameter in the following nonlinear problems:

Problem 1. In the strip (\Pi_T={0\leq x\leq 1,\ 0\leq t\leq T}), find an (n_0)-times ((n_0=\max(2,n))) continuously differentiable solution (u(x,t)) of the equation

[
u_{xx}-u_{tt}=-f(x,t,u,u_x,u_t,\mu),
\tag{1}
]

satisfying the boundary conditions ((i=1,2;\ 0\leq s\leq n-1))

[
\sum_{j=0,1}\ \sum_{k+l=n}
\alpha_{k,l}^{(i,j)}(t,\mu)\,
\left.\frac{\partial^{(n)}u}{\partial x^k\partial t^l}\right|{x=j}
=
\varphi_i\bigl(t,\ldots,D^{(s)}u|
,\ldots,\mu\bigr)},D^{(s)}u|_{x=1
\tag{2}
]

and the initial conditions

[
u(x,0)=\psi_0(x,\mu),\qquad
u_t(x,0)=\psi_1(x,\mu).
\tag{3}
]

Problem 2. In the strip (\Pi_T), find an (n_0)-times continuously differentiable* solution of the equation

[
u_t-u_{xx}=f(x,t,u,u_x,\mu),
\tag{4}
]

satisfying the boundary conditions ((i=1,2;\ 0\leq p+2q\leq n-1))

[
\sum_{j=0,1}\ \sum_{k+2l=n}
\alpha_{k,l}^{(i,j)}(t,\mu)\,
\left.\frac{\partial^{(n)}u}{\partial x^k\partial t^l}\right|{x=j}
=
\varphi_i\left(
t,\ldots,
\left.\frac{\partial^{(s)}u}{\partial x^p\partial t^q}\right|
,
\left.\frac{\partial^{(s)}u}{\partial x^p\partial t^q}\right|_{x=1},
\ldots,\mu
\right)
\tag{5}
]

and the initial condition

[
u(x,0)=\psi_0(x,\mu).
\tag{6}
]

  1. Suppose that for Problems 1 and 2 the following assumptions are fulfilled:

1) For every (0<R<+\infty), when ((x,t)\in\Pi_T), (-R<v_1,v_2,v_3<+R), all partial derivatives of the function (f(x,t,\ldots)) up to order (n_0-1) inclusive exist, are continuous, and satisfy a Lipschitz condition with constant (C_1(R,T)), depending only on (R) and (T).

[
\text{*}
]
Speaking of Problem 1 or 2, by an (m)-times continuously differentiable function (g(x,t,v_1,\ldots,v_k,\mu)) we shall mean a function for which all derivatives of the form
(\partial^{(s)}g/\partial x^\alpha\partial t^\beta\partial v_1^{\gamma_1}\cdots \partial v_k^{\gamma_k}) exist and are continuous, where
(\alpha+\beta+\gamma_1+\cdots+\gamma_k=s\leq m), or
(\alpha+2\beta+\gamma_1+\cdots+\gamma_k=s\leq m), respectively.

2) For any (0<R<+\infty), when ((x,t)\in \Pi_T), (-R<v_1,v_2,\ldots<+R), the functions (\varphi_i(t,v_1,\ldots)), and for problem 1 also all derivatives (\partial\varphi_i/\partial t,\ \partial\varphi_i/\partial v_k), are continuous and satisfy a Lipschitz condition with respect to the variables (v_1,v_2,\ldots), with constant (C_2(R,T)).

3) For (0\leq t\leq T), the coefficients (\alpha_{k,l}^{(i,j)}(t,\mu)) are continuous in (t), and in the case of problem 1
[
(\gamma_1^0-\delta_1^1)(\gamma_2^1+\delta_2^1)-(\gamma_2^0-\delta_2^1)(\gamma_1^1+\delta_1^1)\ne 0,
]
while in the case of problem 2
[
\gamma_{11}\gamma_{22}-\gamma_{12}\gamma_{21}\ne 0,
]
where
[
\gamma_i^j=\sum_{2p\leq n}\alpha_{2p,n-2p}^{(i,j)},\qquad
\delta_i^j=\sum_{2p+1\leq n}\alpha_{2p+1,n-2p-1}^{(i,j)},\qquad
\gamma_{ij}=\sum_{k+2l=n}\alpha_{k,l}^{(i,j)}.
]

4) The functions (\psi_0(x,\mu)) and (\psi_1(x,\mu)) have, respectively, (n_0) and (n_0-1) continuous derivatives with respect to (x) on the segment ([0,1]).

5) The compatibility conditions are satisfied.

Then the following theorems hold for problems 1 and 2.*

Theorem 1. Either in the strip (\Pi_T) there exists a unique (n_0)-times continuously differentiable solution, or there is such a (T_i^,\ 00), there exist unique (n_0)-times continuously differentiable solutions (u_i(x,t)) ((i=1,2)) of problems 1 and 2, respectively, and
[
\max_{\substack{0\leq x\leq 1\ 0\leq t\leq T_i^
-\varepsilon}} |u_i|
+
\max_{\substack{0\leq x\leq 1\ 0\leq t\leq T_i^-\varepsilon}}
\left|\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x}\right|
+
(2-i)
\max_{\substack{0\leq x\leq 1\ 0\leq t\leq T_i^
-\varepsilon}}
\left|\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial t}\right|
+
]
[
+
\sum_{j=0,1}\ \sum_{2\leq k+l\leq n-1}
\max_{0\leq t\leq T_i^*-\varepsilon}
\left|\frac{\partial^{(k+l)}u_i(j,t)}{\partial x^k\partial t^l}\right|
\to \infty
\quad \text{as } \varepsilon\to 0.
]

Theorem 2. If conditions 1)–5) are satisfied for any (\mu\in(\underline{\mu},\bar{\mu})), and the functions occurring in them and their derivatives are continuous in (\mu), then the solutions of problems 1 and 2, together with all derivatives with respect to (x) and (t) up to order (n_0) inclusive, are continuous in (\mu) in the same interval.

Theorem 3. If conditions 1)–5) are satisfied for any (\mu\in(\underline{\mu},\bar{\mu})), and the functions occurring in them and their derivatives are continuously differentiable with respect to (\mu), then the solutions of problems 1 and 2, together with all derivatives up to order (n_0) inclusive, are continuously differentiable with respect to (\mu).

The proof of Theorems 1, 2, and 3 is based on reducing problems 1 and 2 to an equivalent integral form, with subsequent use of Theorems 4, 5, and 6 formulated below. To reduce problems 1 and 2 to integral form, we first consider the linear problems obtained by replacing the right-hand sides of equations (1), (2) and (4), (5) by certain functions (f(x,t)) and (\varphi_i(t)) independent of the variables (x) and (t), whose solution is written in the form
[
u(x,t)=u_0(x,t)+\int_0^t\int_0^1 G(x,t,\xi,\tau) f(\xi,\tau)\,d\xi\,d\tau+
]
[
+\int_0^t G_1(x,t-\tau)\,[\varphi_1(\tau)+L_1 f]\,d\tau
+\int_0^t G_2(x,t-\tau)\,[\varphi_2(\tau)+L_2 f]\,d\tau, \tag{7}
]
where (L_1f) and (L_2f) are linear combinations of derivatives of the function (f(x,t)) up to order (n_0-1) inclusive, evaluated at (x=0,\ x=1), respectively.

* Theorems 1, 2, and 3 remain valid also in the case when terms of the form
[
\nu\chi_i(t,\ldots,D^{(s)}u|{x=0},D^{(s)}u|,\ldots,\mu),
\quad 0\leq s\leq n,
]
are added to the right-hand sides of the boundary conditions (2), (5), where (\nu) is sufficiently small and the functions (\chi_i) satisfy the same conditions as the functions (\varphi_i). Moreover, we note that the case when in equations (1) and (4), before the second derivative with respect to (x), there stands an (n_0)-times continuously differentiable function (a(x,t)>a_0>0) in (\Pi_T), entails no changes in Theorems 1, 2, and 3.

but (u_0(x,t)) is the solution of the corresponding homogeneous problem, satisfying the initial conditions (3) or (6). Substituting in (7), instead of the functions (f(x,t)), (\varphi_i(t)), the functions (f(x,t,\ldots)), (\varphi_i(t,\ldots)), respectively, we obtain the required integral equation. Differentiating the obtained equation with respect to (x) and (t), we arrive at a system of integral equations for the function (u(x,t)) and all its partial derivatives up to order (n_0), inclusive.

We note that the reduction of problem 1 to integral form, with the subsequent application of Theorems 4, 5, and 6, can be obtained by the method of continuation of the initial conditions proposed for nonlinear mixed problems for equations of hyperbolic type in the papers ((^{12})).

Considering the collection of derivatives (u_{\alpha\beta}) ((0 \leq \alpha+\beta \leq n_0) for problem 1 and (0 \leq \alpha+2\beta \leq n_0) for problem 2) as components of the vector (\mathbf u(x,t)), we write the resulting system of integral equations in the form

[
\mathbf u=\Omega \mathbf u,
\tag{8}
]

where the operator (\Omega) is dynamic in the sense of the definition given below. If the norm of the vector (\mathbf u) is defined as

[
|\mathbf u|T=
\max

\left{
\sum_{\alpha,\beta}
\max_{0\leq x\leq 1}
|u_{\alpha\beta}(x,t)|
\right},
]

then for equation (8), under the assumptions of Theorems 1, 2, and 3, respectively the assumptions of Theorems 4, 5, and 6 are fulfilled. The assertions of Theorems 1, 2, and 3 follow from Theorems 4, 5, and 6.

  1. Let (H_T) be the space of continuous functions of the real variable (0\leq \tau\leq T<+\infty) with values in the Banach space (B). The value of a function (h\in H_T) at (\tau=t) will be denoted by (h_t). In the space (H_T) we introduce the norm

[
|h|T=\max|h_t|.
]

An operator (\Omega) mapping (H_T) into itself will be called dynamic if, for any (0\leq t\leq T), from

[
h_\tau=g_\tau \quad \text{for } \tau<t \text{ and } \tau\geq 0
\tag{9}
]

it follows that ((\Omega h)_t=(\Omega g)_t).

Assume that for arbitrary functions (h) and (g) satisfying condition (9), and (t\leq \bar t\leq T),

[
|\Omega h-\Omega g|{\bar t}
\leq
\delta(t,\bar t)\,C(R)|h-g|
,
\tag{10}
]

where (\delta(t,\bar t)\to 0) as (t-\bar t\to 0), and (R=\max{|h|{\bar t},|g|}). Let (\Omega) be an arbitrary dynamic operator defined in the space (H_T) and satisfying (10). Then the following theorems hold concerning the solutions of equation (8).

Theorem 4. Equation (8) is either uniquely solvable in the space (H_T), or there exists such a (00), it is unique, and*

[
|x|_{t^*-\varepsilon}\to\infty
\quad\text{as}\quad
\varepsilon\to 0.
]

Theorem 5. Let the dynamic operator (\Omega(\mu)) be defined in the space (H_{T_1}) for all (\mu\in(\underline\mu,\bar\mu)), satisfy condition (10), and, for some (\mu_0\in(\underline\mu,\bar\mu)),

[
|\Omega(\mu)h-\Omega(\mu_0)h|_{T_1}\to 0
\quad\text{as}\quad
\mu\to\mu_0
]

for an arbitrary function (h\in H_T). Suppose that for (\mu=\mu_0) there exists a solution of equation (8) in the space (H_{T_1}), (0<T_10) such that, for every (\mu) satisfying the inequality (|\mu-\mu_0|<)

* According to the definition, a dynamic operator (\Omega) defined on the space (H_T) is naturally also defined on any space (H_{T'}), with (0<T'<T).

(< \delta(\mu_0, T_1)), there exists a solution (x(\mu)) of equation (8) in the space (H_{T_1}), and
[
|x(\mu)-x(\mu_0)|_{T_1}\to 0 \quad \text{as } \mu\to \mu_0 .
]

Theorem 6. Let the dynamical operator (\Omega(\mu)) be defined in the space (H_T) for all (\mu\in(\underline{\mu}, \overline{\mu})); let, for any (\mu_0\in(\underline{\mu}, \overline{\mu})) and (h_0\in H_T), there exist partial derivatives (*) (\Omega_\mu, \Omega_h) continuous jointly in the variables (\mu_0, h_0). Then, if equation (8) has a solution (x(\mu)) in the space (H_T) for every (\mu\in(\underline{\mu}, \overline{\mu})), the function (x(\mu)) is continuously differentiable with respect to (\mu) on the interval ((\underline{\mu}, \overline{\mu})).

Gorky Research
Physico-Technical Institute
of Gorky State University
named after N. I. Lobachevsky

Received
30 V 1960

References

  1. N. A. Artem’ev, Izv. AN SSSR, ser. matem., No. 1, 15 (1937).
  2. O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, DAN, 107, No. 5, 636 (1956).
  3. O. A. Oleinik, T. D. Vendel’, Matem. sborn., 41 (83), 105 (1957).
  4. M. A. Krasnosel’skii, S. G. Krein, Tr. III Vsesoyuzn. matem. s’ezda, 3, 1958, p. 73.
  5. Chzho Yu-lin’, Matem. sborn., 47 (89), 4, 431 (1959).
  6. V. Pogozhel’skii, Matem. sborn., 47 (89), 4, 387 (1959).
  7. P. E. Sobolevskii, DAN, 130, No. 272 (1960).
  8. S. L. Sobolev, Some Applications of Functional Analysis in Mathematical Physics, L., 1950.
  9. S. A. Khristianovich, Matem. sborn., 2 (44), 871 (1937).
  10. L. V. Kantorovich, G. P. Akilov, Functional Analysis in Normed Spaces, M., 1959.
  11. Yu. T. Neimark, DAN, 127, No. 5, 961 (1959).
  12. V. N. Gol’dberg, DAN, 124, No. 3, 513 (1959); 127, No. 5, 949 (1959).

(*) The derivatives are understood in the strong sense ((^{10})).

Submission history

MATHEMATICS