V. M. Potapov, Academician of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR, M. I. Goryaev, G. A. Tolstikov, and Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR A. P. Terent’ev
Unknown
Submitted 1961-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196101.11455 | Translated from Russian

Abstract

Full Text

Chemistry

V. M. Potapov, Academician of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR, M. I. Goryaev, G. A. Tolstikov, and Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR A. P. Terent’ev

Rotatory Dispersion of Compounds of the Cedrane Series

Compounds of the cedrane series, the first results of whose study at the Institute of Chemical Sciences of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR were recently reported (¹), constitute an interesting subject for the application of the spectropolarimetric method, so successfully used by Djerassi (²) for the investigation of steroid compounds. Until now there have been no data in the literature on spectropolarimetric studies of cedrane compounds, although in several works (³–⁵) the rotatory dispersion of more complex compounds was studied, compounds which also include the perhydroazulene skeleton.

The cyclic nucleus of cedrane* (I) has several asymmetric centers: four of them (3 asymmetric atoms that are bridgehead atoms of the tricyclic system, and the asymmetric atom bearing the methyl group in the five-membered ring) in all the compounds described below (II—X) have the same configuration; thus, the structural and stereochemical changes affect only the seven-membered ring. These changes consist in the introduction of a hydroxyl group at positions 2 and 3, a carbonyl group at position 2, a double bond at position 2—3, and in the conversion of the methyl group at C₃ into a methylene group (formation of an exocyclic double bond), an oxymethylene group, or an aldehyde group:

[structural formula of cedrane, labeled (I)]

[structural formulas]

II cedrol
((R_1 = CH_3;\ R_2 = OH;\ R_3 = H))

III primary cedranol
((R_1 = CH_2OH;\ R_2 = R_3 = H))

IV isocedranol
((R_1 = CH_3;\ R_2 = H;\ R_3 = OH))

V isocedranone
((R_1 = CH_3;\ R_2 = H;\ R_3 = O))

VI α-cedrene
((R = CH_3))

VII cedrenal
((R = CHO))

VIII β-cedrene
((R = H))

IX isocedrenol
((R = OH))

X isocedrenone
((R = O))

* There is no generally accepted numbering for cedrane. We propose carrying it out according to the rules of systematic nomenclature (⁶). The name of this substance according to systematic nomenclature is: 3,5,5,9-tetramethyltricyclo-(10; 11—4; 10—6)-hendecane.

The rotation-dispersion curves of the listed cedrane derivatives are shown in Fig. 1.

For three compounds, β-cedrene (VIII), isocedrenol (IX), and isocedranol (IV), the rotations are very small. Since the measurements were carried out in dilute solutions (not only because of the small amounts of substance available to us, but also because of the low solubility of these compounds in isooctane), the angles read on the polarimeter in the long-wavelength part of the spectrum amounted to only a few hundredths of a degree; therefore the calculated molecular rotations for these substances (see Table 1) should be regarded only as approximate.

Fig. 1. Rotation dispersion of compounds of the cedrane series (in isooctane solutions): II — cedrol; III — primary cedranol; IV — isocedranol; V — isocedranone; VI — α-cedrene; VII — cedrenal; VIII — β-cedrene; IX — isocedrenol; X — isocedrenone

Fig. 1. Rotation dispersion of compounds of the cedrane series (in isooctane solutions):
II — cedrol; III — primary cedranol;
IV — isocedranol; V — isocedranone;
VI — α-cedrene; VII — cedrenal; VIII — β-cedrene; IX — isocedrenol; X — isocedrenone.

Fig. 2. Effect of HCl on the rotation of isocedranone (V) and isocedrenone (X). Dashed lines — solutions in methanol; solid lines — solutions in methanol + HCl

Fig. 2. Effect of HCl on the rotation of isocedranone (V) and isocedrenone (X). Dashed lines — solutions in methanol; solid lines — solutions in methanol + HCl.

Cedrol (II) and primary cedranol (III) have somewhat greater rotation, especially in the ultraviolet part of the spectrum. Noteworthy is

attention to the fact that, with the opposite sign, the absolute magnitudes of the rotation for the two alcohols are practically identical. This fact may be compared with Levin’s observation (^7), who established that alcohols of the type R₁R₂CH—(CH₂)ₙOH, having the same configuration, at (n = 0) (a case similar to cedrol) and (n = 1) (a case similar to primary cedranol), have opposite signs of rotation. However, the analogy with the aliphatic alcohols studied by Levin is, in our case, nevertheless quite remote, and perhaps the reason for the “antipodal” character of curves II and III is that the groups decisive for the creation of asymmetry at

Table 1

Molecular rotations of compounds of the cedrane series in isooctane solutions *

Wavelength Cedrol
(c = 1.42)
Primary cedranol
(c = 1.02)
Isocedranol
(c = 0.15)
Isocedranol
(c = 0.62)
α-Cedrene **
A
(c = 0.98)
α-Cedrene **
B
(c = 1.0)
Cedrenal
(c = 1.1)
β-Cedrene
(c = 2.8)
Isocedrenol
(c = 0.62)
Isocedrenol
(c = 0.36)
589 20.7 −20.5 8 −160 −170 −199 −129 16 4 6
578 24.1 −21.6 8 −165 −175 −203 −132 19 5 6
546 26.5 −22.9 10 −187 −198 −232 −155 21 5 8
435 47.8 −46.4 17 −332 −354 −415 −348 30 10 46
405 58.2 −56.8 18 −412 −435 −513 −498 29 12 79
365 77.8 −78 23 −601 −592 −698 −943 26 19 208
334 103 −106 35 −982 −795 −925 −111 21 33 745
313 153 −125 40 −990 −1030 −1165 −75 21 43 −150
303 153 −131 −473 −1180 −1355 49 56 −667
297 153 −134 53 −212 −1250 −1450 46 −695
289 219 −140 63 0 −1320 −1550 74 −704
280 232 −1440 −1630

* Additional points for isocedranone: −1040 (328), −1110 (322), 90 (285); for cedrenal: −764 (385), −982 (278), −1050 (277), −1080 (375), −1060 (374), −900 (372), −905 (368), −962 (362), −1130 (359), −1200 (357), −1040 (354), −885 (351), −710 (349), −677 (344), −588 (339), −135 (328), −80 (322), −385 (307); for isocedrenone: +124 (385 mμ), +155 (378 mμ), +306 (454 mμ), 389 (349 mμ), +493 (344 mμ), +613 (339 mμ), +721 (339 mμ), +510 (326 mμ).

** Preparation A was obtained by dehydration of cedrol; preparation B, by dehydration of pseudocedrol.

C₃ groups—OH in cedrol and CH₂OH in primary cedranol—occupy antipodal positions.

All the compounds mentioned so far have smooth* curves of rotatory dispersion, as is to be expected for hydrocarbons and alcohols that have no optically active absorption bands in the spectral region accessible to spectropolarimetric measurements. α-Cedrene (VI) also has a smooth curve; however, the magnitudes of rotation for this substance are incomparably greater than for the preceding ones. We had at our disposal two preparations of α-cedrene. The first of them was obtained directly by dehydration of cedrol with formic acid (^1). The second preparation was obtained from α-cedrene of the above-mentioned origin by converting it, under the action of perbenzoic acid, into the oxide, which was reduced by the action of lithium aluminum hydride to pseudocedrol; from the latter, upon dehydration, α-cedrene was again obtained. It turned out that the rotation of α-cedrene obtained by the second route is greater than the rotation of α-cedrene formed directly upon dehydration of cedrol. Since, for all wavelengths, the rotation of the first preparation amounts to 85–86% of the rotation of the second, there is no doubt as to their chemical and steric identity; but the first of them apparently contains an admixture of racemate; any optically active impurity, for example β-cedrene, having a small positive rotation, would disrupt the strict proportionality of the rotatory-dispersion curves of the two preparations.

* To describe rotatory-dispersion curves we use the terms introduced by Djerassi (^2, ^8), translating plain curves as “smooth curves,” peak as “peak,” and trough as “trough.”

The dispersion curves acquire a different character from that of the hydrocarbons and alcohols considered above when a carbonyl chromophore is present in the compound under study. In this case an anomaly appears (a peak or a trough) associated with the carbonyl absorption band. On the dispersion curve of isocedranone (V) there is a trough at 320 mµ; on the dispersion curve of isocederenone (X) there is a peak at 334 mµ; and cedrenal (VII) gives a dispersion curve with a complex Cotton effect, characterized by the presence of two troughs at 375 and 357 mµ. The presence of anomalies in the carbonyl derivatives of cedrene is in complete agreement with all the work of Djerassi, who observed analogous anomalies in steroid ketones (²).

The author mentioned also showed that anomalies caused by the presence of a carbonyl group disappear upon formation of hemiacetals, which readily occurs when traces of hydrochloric acid are added to methanolic solutions of ketones (⁹). Having measured the rotatory dispersion of cedrane ketones in methyl alcohol before and after acidification with a drop of conc. HCl, we found phenomena different from those observed by Djerassi. In both ketones, after acidification, not only was disappearance of the ketone anomaly not observed, but, on the contrary, the magnitude of the rotation at the maximum increased (see Fig. 2). The reason for this behavior of isocedranone and isocederenone is not yet clear.

The synthetic part of the work was carried out at the Institute of Chemical Sciences of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR.

Measurements of rotatory dispersion were carried out in the Department of Organic Chemistry of Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov, using a photoelectric spectropolarimeter (¹⁰) in tubes from 0.5 to 4 dm in length. Owing to the slight absorption of the compounds studied in the ultraviolet, no difficulties arise in the measurements. The results of the measurements are summarized in Table 1.

At present we are continuing the study of the rotatory dispersion of compounds of the cedrane series.

Moscow State University
named after M. V. Lomonosov

Received
2 VI 1961

CITED LITERATURE

¹ M. I. Goryaev, G. A. Tolstikov, ZhOKh, 31, 644 (1961).
² C. Djerassi, Optical Rotatory Dispersion, N. Y., 1960.
³ C. Djerassi, J. Osiecki, W. Herz, J. Org. Chem., 22, 1361 (1957).
⁴ E. J. Eisenbraun, T. George, B. Riniker, C. Djerassi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82, 3648 (1960).
⁵ K. Mislow, C. Djerassi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82, 5247 (1960).
⁶ A. P. Terent’ev, A. N. Kost, A. M. Tsukerman, V. M. Potapov, Nomenclature of Organic Compounds, Publ. House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1955, p. 183.
⁷ P. A. Levene, A. Rothen, J. Org. Chem., 1, 76 (1936).
⁸ C. Djerassi, W. Klyne, Proc. Chem. Soc., 1957, 55.
⁹ C. Djerassi, L. A. Mitscher, B. J. Mitscher, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81, 947 (1959).
¹⁰ V. M. Potapov, A. P. Terent’ev, ZhOKh, 31, 1003 (1961).

Submission history

V. M. Potapov, Academician of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR, M. I. Goryaev, G. A. Tolstikov, and Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR A. P. Terent’ev