Full Text
MATHEMATICS
A. S. UPALOV
ON THE THEORY OF CURVES IN PROJECTIVE SPACE OF \(n\) DIMENSIONS
(Presented by Academician I. G. Petrovskii on 4 IV 1962)
In the present paper a natural frame and differential invariants of the least differential order are constructed for a curve in projective space \(P_n\) of \(n\) dimensions, and an application is given of the results obtained to linear differential equations.
- We shall interpret a point in \(P_n\) as a central ray in the central-affine \((n+1)\)-dimensional space \(E_{n+1}\). To a curve \(C\) in \(P_n\) there will correspond in \(E_{n+1}\) a two-dimensional central conical surface \(S\) with directrix \(K\), whose equation is \(\mathbf r=\mathbf r(t)\), and the admissible transformation of the directrix
\[ \tilde{\mathbf r}=\varphi^{-1}\mathbf r, \]
where the function \(\varphi=\varphi(t)\), differentiable a sufficient number of times and nonzero, is at the same time an admissible transformation of the homogeneous coordinates of the point in \(P_n\).
Since every generator of the surface \(S\) is a central-affine one-dimensional space \(E_1\), with the curve \(C\) there is associated a fibered space \(E_1(K)\). We shall assume that in this space a certain field of local coordinate systems has been chosen and that, under the transformation of the directrix \(\tilde{\mathbf r}=\varphi^{-1}\mathbf r\), the field of local coordinate systems is transformed as follows: \(x^*=\varphi^{-1}x\). Since, moreover, the curve \(K\) is parametrized and, consequently, so is \(X_1\), there is naturally associated with it the holonomized tangent fibered space, which, for convenience of reference, we shall denote by \(T_1(X_1)\). Therefore with the curve \(C\) in \(P_n\) there is associated the doubled fibered space\(^*\) \(E_1\times T_1(X_1)\) \((^3)\).
If the curve \(C\) does not lie in a plane of dimension less than \(n\), then among the vectors
\[
\mathbf r^k=\frac{1}{k!}\frac{d^k\mathbf r}{dt^k},\quad k=0,1,\ldots,
\]
the first \(n+1\) are linearly independent, and there is a unique relation
\[
\mathbf r^{\,n+1}+\sigma_1\mathbf r^{\,n}+\cdots+\sigma_n\mathbf r^{\,1}+\sigma_{n+1}\mathbf r^{\,0}=0.
\tag{1}
\]
We shall assume that, under transformations of coordinates in \(E_1\) and in \(T_1\), the coefficients \(\sigma\) are transformed in such a way that equation (1) remains invariant. Then the connecting object \(\sigma_k\) \((k=1,2,\ldots,n+1)\) determines the curve \(C\) up to automorphisms of the space \(P_n\).
Let in \(E_1\times T_1(X_1)\) a geometric differential object \(\Omega_a\) \((a,b=1,2,\ldots,N)\) be given with transformation laws
\[
\widetilde{\Omega}_a=\Phi_a(\Omega_b,\varphi_k);
\]
\[
{}^*\Omega_a=F_a(\Omega_b,f_k)
\]
under transformations of coordinates in \(E_1\) and in \(T_1\), respectively, where
\[
\varphi_k=\frac{1}{k!}\frac{d^k\varphi}{dt^k},\quad
f_k=\frac{1}{k!}\frac{d^k f}{dt^k},\quad k=0,1,\ldots .
\]
Introduce the operators
\[
D_m\Omega_a=\left(-\frac{\partial\Phi_a(\Omega_b,\varphi_k)}{\partial\varphi_m}\right)_{\varphi_k=\delta_k^0},
\quad
L_m\Omega_a=\left(-\frac{\partial F_a(\Omega_b,f_k)}{\partial f_m}\right)_{f_k=\delta_k^1}^{(2)},
\]
for which we obtain the recurrence relations
\[
D_m\frac{d^k\Omega_a}{dt^k}
=
\frac{d}{dt}D_m\frac{d^{k-1}\Omega_a}{dt^{k-1}}
+
mD_{m-1}\frac{d^{k-1}\Omega_a}{dt^{k-1}},
\]
\[
L_m\frac{d^k\Omega_a}{dt^k}
=
\delta_m^1\frac{d^k\Omega_a}{dt^k}
+
\frac{d}{dt}L_m\frac{d^{k-1}\Omega_a}{dt^{k-1}}
+
mL_{m-1}\frac{d^{k-1}\Omega_a}{dt^{k-1}},
\tag{2}
\]
where \(\delta_k^s\) are the Kronecker symbols.
\[ \overline{\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx}} \]
\(^*\) We use the term “doubled fibered space” instead of “doubled composite manifold” (see \((^2)\), p. 98).
An object \(W\) is then and only then a density of weight \((k,p)\) (i.e., a relative invariant of weight \(k\) in \(E_1\) and weight \(p\) in \(T_1\)) when (see \((2)\))
\[ D_m W = k\delta_m^0 W;\qquad L_m W = p\delta_m^1 W. \tag{3} \]
- Using the known differentiation formulas or, successively applying relations (2), we obtain
\(D_m {}^{k}\mathbf r = {}^{k-m}\mathbf r\),
\(L_m{}^{k}\mathbf r=(k-m+1){}^{k-m+1}\mathbf r\), and everywhere it is to be assumed that an object with a negative index is zero (for example, \({}^{-s}\mathbf r=0\)). Applying condition (3) to the left-hand side of equation (1), we obtain
\[ D_0\sigma_k=0;\quad D_m\sigma_k=-\sigma_{k-m},\quad m>0;\quad k=1,2,\ldots,n+1\quad(\sigma_0=1); \tag{4a} \]
\[ L_1\sigma_k=k\sigma_k;\quad L_m\sigma_k=-(n-k+1)\sigma_{k-m+1},\quad m>1; \quad k=1,2,\ldots,n+1\quad(\sigma_0=1). \tag{4b} \]
The vectors
\[ \mathbf r_k=\sum_{s=0}^{k}\sigma_{k-s}\,{}^{s}\mathbf r \quad\text{and}\quad \widetilde{\nabla}\mathbf r_k=\frac{d}{dt}\mathbf r_k+\sigma_1\mathbf r_k, \quad k=0,1,\ldots,n, \]
form a connecting object with vector components in \(E_1\times T_1(X_1)\), which is a density of weight 1 in \(E_1\), and the first of them are linearly independent. Then there is a unique decomposition
\[ \widetilde{\nabla}\mathbf r_0=\mathbf r_1;\qquad \widetilde{\nabla}\mathbf r_k=(k+1)\mathbf r_{k+1} +\sum_{s=0}^{k} I_{k-s+1}\mathbf r_s, \quad k=1,2,\ldots,n, \tag{5} \]
where one should set \(\mathbf r_{n+1}=0\), and the coefficients \(I_k\), called the projective invariants of the curve, are equal to
\[
I_1=0;\qquad
I_{k+1}=\sum_{h=1}^{k}\frac{d}{dt}\sigma_{k-h}
\sum^{(h)}(-1)^p\frac{p!}{i_1!i_2!\cdots i_h!}
\sigma_1^{i_1}\sigma_2^{i_2}\cdots\sigma_h^{i_h}
\]
\[
{}+(k+1)\sum^{(k+1)}(-1)^p\frac{(p-1)!}{i_1!i_2!\cdots i_{k+1}!}
\sigma_1^{i_1}\sigma_2^{i_2}\cdots\sigma_{k+1}^{i_{k+1}} .
\tag{6}
\]
(\(\sum^{(h)}\) everywhere denotes summation over all ordered systems of nonnegative integers \(i_1,i_2,\ldots,i_h\) satisfying the equation
\(i_1+2i_2+\cdots+hi_h=h\), and the number \(p\) under the summation sign is to be taken equal to
\(p=i_1+i_2+\cdots+i_h\).) The projective invariants \(I_k\)
\((2\le k\le n+1)\) coincide with the projective invariants of N. F. Rzhekhina \((^{1})\), have order \(n+2\) (the smallest possible), and, together with \(\sigma_1\), determine the curve up to automorphisms of the space \(P_n\). Denoting
\[ b_k=\frac{1}{n+2}I_k,\quad 2\le k\le n+1;\qquad b_0=1, \]
according to (2) and (4) we have
\[ L_1b_k=kb_k;\qquad L_m b_k=(k-m)b_{k-m+1},\quad m>1;\quad 2\le k\le n+1. \tag{7} \]
It follows that the collection of quantities \(b_0,b_2,b_3,\ldots,b_{n+1}\) is an object in \(T_1\).
- The objects
\[ G_{k-3}=\frac{d}{dt}b_{k-1}-(k+1)b_k-\sum_{i+j=k}' b_i b_j, \quad k=3,4,\ldots,n+1, \tag{8} \]
(\(\sum'\) denotes summation over all positive integers \(i,j\) greater than 1 and such that \(i+j=k\)) satisfy the condition: if \(G_s=0\)
\((s=0,1,\ldots,h-1)\), then \(G_k\) \((k=0,1,\ldots,h-1,h)\) are densities of weight \((0,k+3)\), respectively.
The maximal number \(q\) such that \(G_0=G_1=\cdots=G_{q-1}=0\) is called the class of the curve \(C\) and is an important arithmetic invariant of it, which can take values from \(0\) to \(n-1\) (for \(q=n-1\) one should take \(G_0\ne 0\)).
a) If \(q<n-2\), then \(\dot\gamma=2G_{q+1}/G_q\) is an object of affine connection in \(T_1(X_1)\); b) if \(q=n-2\), then \(\gamma\) is determined by the condition \(\nabla G_{n-2}=0\). In both cases \(\Gamma=\sigma_1+\dfrac n2\gamma\) is an object of affine connection in \(E_1(X_1)\). Finally, c) if \(q=n-1\), then one can introduce such fields of local coordinate systems in \(E_1\times T_1(X_1)\) that the points of the curve \(C\) will have coordinates \((1,t,t^2,\ldots,t^n)\).
Assuming further that \(q<n-1\), and considering the object \(b_1=-2\gamma\), satisfying condition (7) for \(k=1\), we obtain that the vectors
\[
\mathbf R_k=\mathbf r_k+G_1^k\mathbf r_{k-1}+\cdots+G_{k-1}^k\mathbf r_1+G_k^k\mathbf r_0,
\]
where
\[
G_h^k=\sum^{(h)}\frac{(k-n-1)(k-n-2)\cdots(k-n-p)}{i_1!i_2!\cdots i_h!}\,
b_1^{i_1}b_2^{i_2}\cdots b_h^{i_h},
\tag{9}
\]
are densities of weight \((1,k)\), respectively, and therefore form a natural frame of the curve \(C\). It is shown that the order of the natural frame \(n+3\) for \(q<n-2\) and \(n+4\) for \(q=n-2\) is minimal; if \(q=n-1\), the objects \(G_k^h\) cannot be constructed.
- Having objects of affine connections in \(E_1\times T_1(X_1)\), one can construct the basic differentiation of densities of weight \((k,p)\) \((^3)\). Then from the unique expansion
\[ D\mathbf R_n+\sum_{k=0}^{n}v_{n-k+1}\mathbf R_n=0 \tag{10} \]
there are determined densities \(v_k\) of weight \((0,k)\), \(k=1,2,\ldots,n+1\), which have the form
\[ v_0=0;\qquad v_2=\frac d{dt}b_1-3b_2+b_1^2; \]
\[ v_{k+3}=\sum_{h=0}^{k}(k-h+1)G_{k-h}\sum^{(h)} \frac{k(k-1)\cdots(k-p+2)}{i_1!i_2!\cdots i_h!}\, b_1^{i_1}b_2^{i_2}\cdots b_h^{i_h}, \tag{11} \]
where the objects \(G_k\) are found by formula (8), and the densities \(v_k\) \((k>2)\) have minimal order \(n+3\), while \(v_2\) has order \(n+4\) for \(q<n-2\) and order \(n+5\) for \(q=n-2\).
Let us differentiate each vector of the natural frame basically and expand these derivatives in the vectors of the same frame. We obtain
\[
D\mathbf R_0=\mathbf R_1;\qquad
D\mathbf R_k=(k+1)\mathbf R_{k+1}+(n-k+1)\sum_{s=0}^{k-1}v_{k-s+1}\mathbf R_s,
\tag{12}
\]
\[
k=1,2,\ldots,n-1.
\]
These relations together with (10) constitute the Frenet formulas for the curve \(C\), from which it follows that the densities \(v_2,v_3,\ldots,v_{n+1}\), together with the objects of affine connections \(\gamma\) and \(\Gamma\), determine the curve up to automorphisms of the space \(P_n\).
Since \(v_q=G_q\) is different from zero, one can introduce the projective arc length of the curve
\[
s=\int |v_q|^{1/q}\,dt
\]
and construct its invariants (curvatures) of minimal order
\[
\varkappa_1=|v_q|^{-(q+1)/q}\cdot Dv_q;\qquad
\varkappa_k=v_k\cdot |v_q|^{-k/q},
\]
\[
k=2,3,\ldots,q-1,\quad q+1,\ldots,n+1;
\tag{13}
\]
then from the Frenet formulas it follows that the specification of the invariants \(\varkappa_k\) as functions of arc length determines the curve up to automorphisms of the space \(P_n\), for one can always choose \(\varphi\) so that \(\widetilde\Gamma=0\).
- Let a homogeneous linear differential equation be given,
\[ y^{(n+1)}+a_1y^{(n)}+\cdots+a_ny'+a_{n+1}y=0. \tag{14} \]
It preserves its form under a change of variable and a linear change of the function \(y=\varphi \tilde y\). With equation (14) there is associated, one-to-one, a curve \(C\) in projective \(n\)-dimensional space \(P_n\), defined by the object
\[ \sigma_k=\frac{(n-k+1)!}{(n+1)!}\,a_k,\quad 1\leq k\leq n+1, \]
up to automorphisms of the space \(P_n\). Therefore all objects invariantly connected with the curve \(C\) will be objects invariantly connected with the equation; in particular, \(I_k\) are called projective invariants, \(\varkappa_k\) invariants, and the number \(q\) the class of the equation. Then the equation is reduced to the form
\[ y^{(n+1)}+g_{q+3}y^{(n-q-2)}+\cdots+g_ny'+g_{n+1}y=0, \]
where the parameter \(z\) is chosen in such a way that \(b_2(z)=0\), and
\[ \varphi=-\exp\int \sigma_1\,dz. \]
Further, if the coefficients \(a_k\) are continuously differentiable once, then it follows from (5) that equation (14) is reducible by a change of the function \(y=\varphi \tilde y\) to an equation with constant coefficients if and only if its projective invariants are constant; here one should put
\[ \varphi=-\exp\int \sigma_1\,dt. \]
Finally, from Frenet’s formulas it follows that equation (14) is reducible by a change of variable and a linear change of the function to an equation with constant coefficients if and only if its invariants \(\varkappa_k\) are constant; here it is required that the coefficients \(a_k\) be differentiable 3 times when \(q<n-2\) and 4 times when \(q=n-2\), although some of them may be differentiable a smaller number of times. The parameter is changed according to the formula
\[ s=\int |v_q|^{1/q}\,dt, \]
and
\[ \varphi=-\exp\int \Gamma(s)\,ds^*. \]
Saratov State University
named after N. G. Chernyshevsky
Received
31 III 1962
REFERENCES
- N. F. Rzhekhina, Proceedings of the Seminar on Vector and Tensor Analysis, vol. XI, 153 (1961).
- A. E. Liber, Scientific Notes of Saratov State University named after N. G. Chernyshevsky, 70, 73 (1961); Scientific Yearbook of Saratov State University named after N. G. Chernyshevsky for 1955, p. 34 (1955).
- A. E. Liber, DAN, 90, 137 (1953).
* The results of the work were presented at the IV All-Union Mathematical Congress.