Full Text
CHEMISTRY
Academician A. V. TOPCHIEV, E. L. FANTALOVA, L. V. OSIPOVA
POLYMERIZATION OF ALLYLCYCLOHEXANE IN THE PRESENCE OF THE CATALYTIC SYSTEM TiCl₄ + Al(iso-C₄H₉)₃
The field of polymerization of naphthenic hydrocarbons with an unsaturated side chain has begun to be developed only in recent years. The synthesis of polyallylcyclohexane, which has a high melting point and is capable of forming films and fibers, in addition to theoretical significance, is also of some practical interest. In the literature there is only one paper in which the preparation of polyallylcyclohexane in the presence of titanium tetrachloride and triethylaluminum is described and a brief characterization of the properties of this polymer is given (¹).
Table 1
Polymerization of allylcyclohexane in the presence of the catalytic system
Al(iso-C₄H₉)₃ + TiCl₄
| No. of experiments | Monomer, mmol | Al(iso-C₄H₉)₃, mmol | TiCl₄, mmol | n-Heptane, mmol | Al : Ti, molar | Polymerization temp., °C | Reaction duration, h | Yield of solid polymer, wt. % per monomer | Softening temp., °C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymerization in ampoules | |||||||||
| 42 | 60 | 3 | 3 | 68 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 5 | 7.5 | 210—225 |
| 49 | 60 | 6 | 6 | 68 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 5 | 12.4 | 125—220 |
| 40 | 60 | 4 | 2 | 68 | 2 : 1 | 70 | 5 | traces | |
| 45 | 30 | 4 | 2 | 103 | 2 : 1 | 70 | 5 | 16.6 | 208—218 |
| 46 | 60 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 68 | 4 : 1 | 70 | 5 | 4.0 | 220—224 (not all up to 270°) |
| 55a | 30 | 4 | 2 | 103 | 2 : 1 | 70 | 42 | 48.5 | 205—214 |
| 75 | 30 | 4 | 2 | 103 | 2 : 1 | 70 | 42 | 48.5 | 212—224 |
| 54a | 30 | 3 | 3 | 103 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 42 | 61.0 | 208—218 |
| 72 | 30 | 3 | 3 | 103 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 25 | 69.5 | 232—262 |
| 74 | 30 | 3 | 3 | 103 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 20 | 73.5 | 225—239 |
| 63 | 10 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 110 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 42 | 0 | Viscous oil |
| 62a | 10 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 110 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 42 | 37.0 | 202—225 |
| 626 | 10 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 110 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 42 | 37.0 | 202—230 |
| Polymerization in an open system | |||||||||
| 10a | 30 | 2 | 1 | 336 | 2 : 1 | 70 | 5 | 0 | |
| 11a | |||||||||
| 5a | 30 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 336 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 5 | 22.6 | 213—237 |
| 4a | 30 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 336 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 5 | 28.2 | 216—233 |
| 7a | 30 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 336 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 42 | 25.4 | up to 231 |
| 9a | 30 | 5 | 5 | 336 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 5 | 56.6 | up to 237° |
| 3a | 60 | 10 | 10 | 672 | 1 : 1 | 70 | 5 | 55.9 | 212—238 |
| 2a | 60 | 4 | 2 | 134 | 2 : 1 | 70 | 42 | 17.5 | 210—234 |
Allylcyclohexane was synthesized by us from cyclohexylmagnesium chloride and allyl bromide according to the slightly modified procedure of R. Ya. Levina \(^{(2)}\). The allylcyclohexane obtained in 55.6% yield, after boiling and distillation over metallic sodium, had the following physicochemical constants: b.p. \(152—153^\circ/757\) mm Hg, \(d_4^{20}\) 0.8206, \(n_D^{20}\) 1.4510; \(MR_D\) found 40.77, calculated 41.09; elemental composition:
Found, %: C 86.99; H 13.01
Calculated, %: C 87.02; H 12.98
(The allylcyclohexane synthesized by R. Ya. Levina and F. F. Tsurikov had the following constants: b.p. \(151—152^\circ\), \(d_4^{20}\) 0.8155; \(n_D^{20}\) 1.4510.)
Recording the infrared spectrum of the monomer showed the absence of impurities.* Polymerization of allylcyclohexane was carried out both in an open system and in ampoules according to generally accepted procedures at \(70^\circ\), in a nitrogen atmosphere, in \(n\)-heptane. The most characteristic experiments are given in Table 1.
In the polymerization of allylcyclohexane in ampoules under conditions optimal for the polymerization of allylcyclopentane ** (experiments 42, 40, 45), insignificant yields of solid polymer are obtained even at high catalyst concentration (experiment 49). Increasing the molar ratio of the catalyst components \(\mathrm{Al}(\text{iso-}\mathrm{C}_4\mathrm{H}_9)_3 : \mathrm{TiCl}_4\) to \(3:1\) and \(4:1\) likewise does not increase the yield of solid polyallylcyclohexane (experiment 46).
Only with an increase in the polymerization time to 20 or more hours were high polymer yields achieved. In long experiments, the influence of the catalyst concentration begins to be sharply manifested (experiments 62 and 63).
In the polymerization of allylcyclohexane at atmospheric pressure, as in polymerization in ampoules, the optimal molar ratio of the catalyst components proved to be \(1:1\).
The decisive factor in this case is the catalyst concentration (experiments 10a, 4a, 9a). In contrast to ampoule polymerization, the optimal time for polymerization in an open system proved to be 5 h.
It should be noted that parallel experiments show good agreement of the results (experiments 62a, 62b, 3a, 4a, 5a).
Table 2
Fractionation of polyallylcyclohexane by the extraction method
| Polymer | Ether-soluble fraction: fraction content in polymer, % | Ether-soluble fraction: softening temperature, °C | Ether-soluble fraction: characteristic viscosity, \(\eta\)** | \(n\)-heptane-soluble fraction: fraction content in polymer, % | \(n\)-heptane-soluble fraction: softening temperature, °C | \(n\)-heptane-soluble fraction: characteristic viscosity, \(\eta\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obtained by polymerization in an open system | 20—40 | 95—115 m.p.—237* |
0.26 \(M=600—800\) (cryoscopy) 0.26 |
60—80 | 210—224 m.p. 263° |
0.29 reprecipitated. \(M=6\cdot10^4\) 0.5—unreprecipitated |
| Obtained by polymerization in ampoules | 29—37 | up to 120° m.p.—243 |
71—63 | 0.37 |
* The melting temperature was determined by the polarization-microscope method.
** Determined in benzene at \(30^\circ\mathrm{C}\).
The solid polymer obtained, a white, finely dispersed powder, was fractionated in a Soxhlet apparatus by successive treatment with boiling diethyl ether and \(n\)-heptane (see Table 2). In contrast to polyallylcyclopentane, all polyallylcyclohexane is soluble in boiling \(n\)-heptane.
As X-ray structural analysis showed ***, both fractions are amorphous.
* The authors express their gratitude to M. M. Kusakov, M. V. Shishkina, and E. A. Prokof’eva for recording the infrared spectra.
* The article devoted to the polymerization of allylcyclopentane is in press.
** The authors express their gratitude to V. V. Shchekin and F. V. Korenevskaya for taking the X-ray patterns.
However, when the melting point was determined by the polarization-microscope method, after prolonged annealing of the polymer, well-formed crystals were obtained.*
Found, %: C 86.96; H 12.94
Calculated, %: C 87.02; H 12.98
The elemental composition indicates the absence of catalyst impurities in the polymer.
The weight-average molecular weight, determined for the fraction of polyallylcyclohexane soluble in $n$-heptane by the light-scattering method at $\lambda = 5461$ Å, proved to be 60000.**
The infrared spectrum of polyallylcyclohexane showed the presence in the polymer of a monosubstituted cyclohexane ring, $\mathrm{CH}_2$ groups, and a small amount of methyl groups, which are apparently terminal. In addition, the polymer contains no polymethylene chains with more than five methyl groups. Comparison with the spectrum of 2,4-dimethylhexane showed that addition of the individual polymer units occurs in a “head-to-tail” manner and, consequently, the polymer has the structure:
$$ \ldots-\mathrm{CH}-\mathrm{CH}_2-\mathrm{CH}-\mathrm{CH}_2-\mathrm{CH}-\mathrm{CH}_2-\ldots $$
$$ \begin{array}{ccc} | & | & |\\ \mathrm{CH}_2 & \mathrm{CH}_2 & \mathrm{CH}_2\\ | & | & |\\ \text{cyclohexyl} & \text{cyclohexyl} & \text{cyclohexyl} \end{array} $$
Fig. 1. Thermomechanical curve for the fraction of polyallylcyclohexane soluble in $n$-heptane.
Figure 1 gives the thermomechanical curve for the polymer fraction soluble in $n$-heptane.***
Liquid polymers, precipitated with water from methanolic solutions, are viscous liquids boiling over a wide temperature range.
Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis
Academy of Sciences of the USSR
Received
24 VIII 1962
REFERENCES
- T. W. Campbell, A. C. Haven, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1, 73 (1959).
- R. Ya. Levina, F. F. Tsurikov, ZhOKh, 4, 1250 (1934).
* For the determination of the melting temperatures we express our gratitude to G. V. Vinogradov and O. S. Khvatova.
* For the determination of the molecular weight the authors express their gratitude to M. M. Kusakov, Yu. A. Koshevnik, and E. A. Razumovskaya.
** For recording the thermomechanical curve the authors express their gratitude to G. L. Slonimsky.