Full Text
S. Ya. AL’PER
ON THE BEST APPROXIMATION OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS IN THE MEAN OF FIRST DEGREE ON A CIRCLE
(Presented by Academician V. I. Smirnov on 6 V 1963)
1°. We shall consider the problem of determining exact and asymptotic values for the best approximation in the metric \(L\) on the circle \(|z|=1\) of the analytic functions \(\dfrac{1}{z-a}\), \(\ln(z-a)\), \((z-a)^s\), and other functions, by polynomials of degree \(n\). For the best approximation of the indicated functions in the metric \(L\) on the segment \([-1,+1]\) of the real axis for real \(a\), such a question was studied in the works of S. M. Nikol’skii \((^1)\), N. I. Akhiezer \((^2)\), and others. The best approximation in the metric \(L\) of a function \(f(z)\in L\) on the circle \(|z|=r,\ 0<r\leqslant 1\), will be denoted by \(\rho_n^{(1)}[f,r]\):
\[ \rho_n^{(1)}[f,r]=\inf \int_{|z|=r} |f(z)-Q_n(z)|\cdot |dz| \]
over all possible polynomials \(Q_n(z)\) of degree \(n\); \(\rho_n^{(1)}[f,1]=\rho_n^{(1)}[f]\).
We shall use the following criterion:
In order that \(P_n(z)\) be a polynomial of best approximation in the metric \(L_p,\ p\geqslant 1\), of degree \(n\) to the function \(f(z)\in L_p\) on a rectifiable curve \(\Gamma\)*, it is sufficient and (for \(p=1\) and the case where the difference \(f(z)-P_n(z)\) is nonzero almost everywhere on \(\Gamma\)) necessary that, for every polynomial \(Q_n(z)\) of degree \(n\), the equality
\[ \int_{\Gamma} |f(z)-P_n(z)|^{p-1}\operatorname{Re}\{Q_n(z)\operatorname{sign}[\overline{f(z)-P_n(z)}]\}\,dz=0 \]
hold, where \(\operatorname{sign} w=w/|w|\) for \(w\ne 0\) and \(\operatorname{sign} w=0\) for \(w=0\).
In the case when \(\Gamma\) is the segment \([-1,+1]\), \(f(z)\) is a real-valued function, and \(p=1\), this criterion was established by S. M. Nikol’skii \((^3)\).
In the general case this criterion is an analogue of the criterion established by A. F. Timan \((^4)\) with the metric \(L_p\) defined by an integral over a domain. In the case when \(p=1\) and \(\Gamma\) is the circle \(|z|=1\), the polynomial \(P_n(z)\) of degree \(n\) gives the best approximation if the equality
\[ \int_{|z|=1} z^{-m}\frac{f(z)-P_n(z)}{|f(z)-P_n(z)|}\,|dz|=0 \tag{1} \]
holds for all \(m=0,1,2,\ldots,n\).
2°. The starting point is the determination of the quantity \(\rho_n^{(1)}\!\left[\dfrac{1}{z-a}\right]\), \(|a|\ne 1\).
Consider the identity
\[ \frac{1}{z-a}-P_n(z)= M\frac{1+\bar a z+\bar a^{\,2}z^2+\ldots+\bar a^{\,n+1}z^{n+1}}{z-a}, \tag{2} \]
\[ \text{* The condition } f(x)\in L_p \text{ on } \Gamma \text{ means that } \int_{\Gamma}|f(z)|^p\,|dz|<\infty. \]
in which \(P_n(z)\) is a polynomial of degree \(n\), and the number \(M\) is determined from the condition that the residue of the right-hand side at the point \(z=a\) is equal to 1,
\(M=(|a|^2-1)(|a|^{2n+4}-1)^{-1}\). We shall show that \(P_n(z)\) is the polynomial of best approximation in the metric \(L\) on the circle \(|z|=1\) for the function \(\dfrac{1}{z-a}\). Multiplying the numerator and denominator of the right-hand side of (2) by \(\bar z-\bar a\), where \(|z|=1\), we represent this formula in the form
\[ \frac{1}{z-a}-P_n(z) = M\frac{\bar z-\bar a^{\,n+2}z^{n+1}} {1-2|a|\cos(\vartheta-\alpha)+|a|^2}, \]
where \(z=e^{i\vartheta}\), \(a=|a|e^{i\alpha}\). Hence we find
\[ \left|\frac{1}{z-a}-P_n(z)\right| = M \frac{\sqrt{1-2|a|^{n+2}\cos (n+2)(\vartheta-\alpha)+|a|^{2n+4}}} {1-2|a|\cos(\vartheta-\alpha)+|a|^2}. \]
According to condition (1), it is enough to show that the integral
\[ \int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{\bar z^{\,n+1}-\bar a^{\,n+2}z^{n+1-m}} {\sqrt{1-2|a|^{n+2}\cos (n+2)(\vartheta-\alpha)+|a|^{2n+1}}} \,d\vartheta \tag{3} \]
vanishes for all \(m=0,1,2,\ldots,n\).
We note that for \(k=1,2,\ldots,n+1\) the equality
\[ \int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{\cos k\varphi} {\sqrt{1-2c\cos (n+2)\varphi+c^2}}\,d\varphi =0, \tag{4} \]
holds, where \(c\) is any number \(>0\) and \(\ne 1\). Indeed, this follows from the Fourier expansion
\[ (1-2c\cos\varphi+c^2)^{-1/2} = \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} A_m\cos m\varphi, \]
in which \(\varphi\) is replaced by the quantity \((n+2)\varphi\). From (4) there follows the vanishing of the integral (3) for \(m=0,1,2,\ldots,n\).
Thus, \(P_n(z)\) is the polynomial of best approximation, and for \(|a|\ne 1\) the formula is valid
\[ \rho_n^{(1)} \left[\frac{1}{z-a}\right] = \frac{|a|^2-1}{|a|^{2n+4}-1} = \int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{\sqrt{1-2|a|^{n+2}\cos (n+2)\vartheta+|a|^{2n+4}}} {1-2|a|\cos\vartheta+|a|^2} \,d\vartheta . \tag{5} \]
From formula (5), for \(|a|>1\), there follows the asymptotic formula
\[ \rho_n^{(1)} \left[\frac{1}{z-a}\right] \sim \frac{2\pi}{|a|^{\,n+2}}. \tag{6} \]
For \(|a|<1\), from (5) it follows that
\[ \lim_{n\to\infty}\rho_n^{(1)} \left[\frac{1}{z-a}\right] =2\pi. \tag{7} \]
In particular, \(\rho_n^{(1)}[z^{-1}]=2\pi\), and the polynomial of best approximation in mean of the first degree is the identically zero polynomial.
\(3^\circ\). By an analogous method one can find
\(\rho_n^{(1)}\left[\dfrac{z^s}{z^p-a^p}\right]\), where \(p\) is a natural number \(>1\), \(s\) is equal to one of the numbers \(0,1,2,\ldots,p-1\), and \(|a|\ne 1\). For this purpose the identity
\[ \frac{z^s}{z^p-a^p}-Q_n(z) = \frac{|a|^{2p}-1}{|a|^{2p(k+2)}-1}\,H(z), \tag{8} \]
in which \(Q_n(z)\) is some polynomial of degree \(n\); \(n\) is any number of the form \(kp+s\) (\(k\) is an integer \(\geq 0\)) and
\[ H(z)=\frac{z^s\left[1+\bar a^p z^p+\bar a^{2p}z^{2p}+\cdots+\bar a^{(k+1)p}z^{(k+1)p}\right]}{z^p-a^p}. \]
From identity (8) one obtains the formula
\[ \rho_n^{(1)}\left[\frac{z^s}{z^p-a^p}\right] = \frac{|a|^{2p}-1}{|a|^{2p(k+2)}-1} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{\sqrt{1-2|a|^{p(k+2)}\cos(k+2)p\vartheta+|a|^{2p(k+2)}}} {1-2|a|^p\cos p\vartheta+|a|^{2p}}\,d\vartheta, \tag{9} \]
which is valid for the numbers \(n=kp+s\), and also for \(kp+s+1,\ldots, kp+s+p-1\); \(Q_n(z)\) will be a polynomial of best approximation in the mean of degree \(n,n+1,\ldots,n+p-1\). For \(|a|>1\), (9) gives the asymptotic formula
\[ \rho_n^{(1)}\left[\frac{z^s}{z^p-a^p}\right]\sim \frac{2\pi}{|a|^{p(k+2)}} \]
as \(k\to\infty\) and \(n=kp+s, kp+s+1,\ldots, kp+s+p-1\). For \(|a|<1\) we obtain
\[ \lim_{n\to\infty}\rho_n^{(1)}\left[\frac{z^s}{z^p-a^p}\right]=2\pi. \]
In particular, for \(a=0,\ s=0\) we shall have \(\rho_n^{(1)}[1/z^p]=2\pi\).
\(4^\circ\). Starting from identity (2), with the aid of integration with respect to the parameter \(a\) (first taking \(a\) real, \(a>1\)), one can obtain the asymptotic formula
\[ \rho_n^{(1)}[\ln(z-a)]\sim \frac{2\pi}{n|a|^{n+1}}, \tag{10} \]
valid for any complex \(a\) satisfying \(|a|>1\).
\(5^\circ\). If \(f(z)=(a-z)^s\) for real \(s\) and \(a>1\), then construct a polynomial \(P_n(z)\) of degree \(n\) which coincides with \(f(z)\) at the zeros of the polynomial
\[ R(z)=1+az+a^2z^2+\cdots+a^{n+1}z^{n+1}. \]
Then
\[ (a-z)^s-P_n(z)=\frac{R(z)}{2\pi i} \int_{|\zeta|=r} \frac{(a-\zeta)^s}{(\zeta-z)R(\zeta)}\,d\zeta, \]
where \(1<r<a\). First assuming \(s>-1\) and deforming the contour of integration in the appropriate way, we obtain
\[ (a-z)^s-P_n(z) = -\frac{(1-a^{n+2}z^{n+2})\sin\pi s}{(1-az)\pi} \int_a^\infty \frac{(x-a)^s(1-ax)}{(x-z)(1-a^{n+2}x^{n+2})}\,dx. \]
Estimating the integral with the help of S. N. Bernstein’s asymptotic formula \((5)\) and using the result from \(2^\circ\), we obtain
\[ \rho_n^{(1)}[(z-a)^s]\sim \frac{2\Gamma(s+1)|\sin\pi s|}{n^{s+1}|a|^{\,n-s+1}}. \tag{11} \]
This formula is valid for any complex \(a\), \(|a|>1\), and any real \(s\) different from zero and from a positive integer. Setting \(s=-p\), it can be represented in the form
\[ \rho_n^{(1)}\left[\frac{1}{(z-a)^p}\right]\sim \frac{2\pi n^{p-1}}{\Gamma(p)|a|^{n+p+1}}. \tag{12} \]
If
\[ f(z)=\sum_{m=1}^{k}\frac{A_m}{(z-a)^m}+\varphi(z), \]
where \(|a|>1,\ A_k\ne 0\), and \(\varphi(z)\) is analytic in the disk with center \(z=0\) and radius \(>|a|\), then
\[ \rho_n^{(1)}[f]\sim |A_k|\frac{2\pi n^{k-1}}{(k-1)!\,|a|^{n+k+1}}. \]
Let us note that the passage to the limit as \(a\to 1\) in formula (11) (for \(s>-1\)) or in formula (10) cannot be carried out, since the proof of these formulas does not imply their uniformity with respect to \(a\).
\(6^\circ\). The following analogue holds of S. N. Bernstein’s formula \((^7)\), proved by him for uniform approximation on the interval \([-1,+1]\):
\[ \rho_n^{(1)}[(z-a)^s\Phi(z)]\sim |\Phi(a)|\,\rho_n^{(1)}[(z-a)^s], \tag{13} \]
where \(|a|>1\), \(s\) is not equal to 0 or to a positive integer, and \(\Phi(z)\) is an analytic function in some disk \(|z|<R,\ R>|a|\), under the condition \(\Phi(a)\ne 0\).
\(7^\circ\). Let \(H_1^{(s)}\) denote the class of all functions analytic in the disk \(|z|<1\) for which
\[ \lim_{\rho\to 1}\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}|f^{(s)}(\rho e^{i\theta})|\,d\theta\le 1, \]
where \(s\) is an integer \(\ge 0\), \(H_1^{(0)}=H_1\). Using the results of K. I. Babenko \((^7)\), one can obtain an exact formula for the best mean approximation of functions of the class \(H_1^{(s)}\).
Theorem. For \(0<r\le 1\), when \(n\ge s\), the formula
\[ \sup_{f\in H_1^{(s)}}\rho_{n-1}^{(2)}[f,r]=2\pi r^{n+1}\alpha_{n,s}, \]
holds, where
\[ \alpha_{n,s}=\frac{1}{n(n-1)\ldots(n-s+1)} \]
for \(s>0\), and \(\alpha_{n,0}=1\).
For \(s=0\) one can obtain an asymptotic formula for the quantity appearing in the theorem, and \(0<r<1\), without relying on K. I. Babenko’s results, but using the Cauchy integral formula and the estimate following from formula (6),
\[ \int_{|z|=r}\left|\frac{1}{\xi-z}-Q_{n-1}(z,\xi)\right|\cdot |dz|<2\pi r^{n+1}(1+\varepsilon_n) \]
for any \(\xi,\ |\xi|=1\), where \(Q_{n-1}(z,\xi)\) is some polynomial of degree \(n-1\) in \(z\), \(\varepsilon_n>0\), and \(\lim \varepsilon_n=0\).
Received
3 V 1963
REFERENCES
- S. M. Nikol’skii, Izv. AN SSSR, Ser. Mat., 11, 139 (1947).
- N. I. Akhiezer, Lectures on Approximation Theory, 1947.
- S. M. Nikol’skii, Izv. AN SSSR, Ser. Mat., 10, 207 (1946).
- A. F. Timan, RZhMat, No. 4, ref. 2854 (1958).
- S. N. Bernstein, Extremal Properties of Polynomials, 1937.
- S. N. Bernstein, Collected Works, 2, 1954, p. 88.
- K. I. Babenko, Izv. AN SSSR, Ser. Mat., 22, No. 5 (1958).