PHYSICS
G. A. SOKOLIK
Submitted 1964-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196401.23746 | Translated from Russian

Full Text

PHYSICS

G. A. SOKOLIK

SPINOR NOTATION FOR THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD

(Presented by Academician N. N. Bogolyubov on 2 IX 1963)

  1. In the present paper the method of compensating fields is extended to spinor quantities.

In work \((^1)\) attempts were made to construct a spinor theory of gravitation, but the results of \((^1)\) are incorrect, since, according to \((^2)\), tensor and spinor quantities can be related by the formulas

\[ g^{p\dot\alpha\beta}g_{\dot\alpha\gamma}^{q} + g^{q\dot\alpha\beta}g_{\dot\alpha\gamma}^{p} = 2g^{pq}\delta_\gamma^\beta, \qquad \Phi_{\dot\alpha\beta}=g_{p\dot\alpha\beta}x^p \]

only in an orthogonal basis. In what follows we shall use the method of compensating fields \((^3)\); moreover, the relation between the invariant derivative induced by the local Lorentz group \(\mathcal L\) and spinor invariant derivatives will be indicated.

  1. The expression for the invariant derivative that specifies the gravitational interaction \((^3)\) follows from the condition of covariance of the wave relativistic equation in an orthogonal basis:

\[ (\Omega_\sigma(i)\mathcal L_i\partial_\sigma+m)\psi=0, \tag{1} \]

where \(\Omega_\sigma(i)\) are Lamé coefficients relating orthogonal and world coordinates, with respect to the local Lorentz group,

\[ \mathcal L_{ii'}=\exp[\varepsilon_{lk}(x)M_{ii'}^{lk}], \]

\[ M_{ii'}^{lk}=\frac12(\delta_i^k g_{i'}^{\,l}-g_i^{\,l}\delta_{i'}^k) \]

(\(u_\sigma\) are world coordinates; \(x_i=\Omega_\sigma(i)u_\sigma\)),

\[ \partial_\sigma\to\nabla_\sigma=\partial_\sigma-\frac12\Delta_\sigma(i,k)I_{ik}, \]

where \(\Delta_\sigma(i,k)\) are the Ricci coefficients:

\[ \Delta_\sigma(i,k)=\Omega^\tau(i)\Omega^\lambda(k)M_{\sigma\tau\lambda}^{\gamma\alpha\beta} \Omega_\gamma(i)\partial_\alpha\Omega_\beta(j), \]

\[ M_{\sigma\tau\lambda}^{\gamma\alpha\beta} = \frac12( \delta_\sigma^\gamma\delta_\tau^\alpha\delta_\lambda^\beta + \delta_\lambda^\gamma\delta_\tau^\alpha\delta_\sigma^\beta + \delta_\tau^\gamma\delta_\sigma^\alpha\delta_\lambda^\beta - \delta_\sigma^\gamma\delta_\lambda^\alpha\delta_\tau^\beta - \delta_\lambda^\gamma\delta_\sigma^\alpha\delta_\tau^\beta - \delta_\tau^\gamma\delta_\lambda^\alpha\delta_\sigma^\beta ), \]

which transform according to the formula

\[ \delta\Delta_\sigma(i,k) = \varepsilon_{ln}C_{ln;\,sp}^{ik}\Delta_\sigma(s,p) + \partial_\sigma\varepsilon_{ik} \]

\((^3)\); \(I_{ik}\) are the generators of the representation \(\mathcal L\) according to which \(\psi\) transforms:

\[ \varepsilon_{ik}=\varepsilon_{ik}(u), \qquad [I_{ik}I_{ls}]=C_{ik;\,ls}^{nm}I_{nm}. \]

  1. We shall use the well-known decomposition that reduces the Lorentz group to the contracted direct product of second-order unimodular groups, according to which dotted and undotted semispinors \((1/20)\) and \((01/2)\) transform \((^2)\). Then the generators of the representation are reduced to

\[ \tau_i=iI_{4i}+I_{jk}; \qquad \nu_i=iI_{4i}-I_{jk} \quad (ijk=\text{cycl}); \qquad [\tau_i\nu_j]=0. \]

\[ [\tau_i\tau_j]=\tau_k \quad\text{and}\quad [\nu_i\nu_j]=\nu_k \]

correspond to the sets of weights \((j_1j_2)\) and \((j_2j_1)\).

Equation (1) in this case takes the form of a second-order equation:

\[ \mathscr{L}_{\alpha\dot{\alpha}}\Omega_{\sigma}(\alpha)\Omega_{\dot{\sigma}}(\dot{\alpha})\, \partial_{\sigma\dot{\sigma}}\psi+m\psi=0, \tag{2} \]

where \(\Omega_{\sigma}(\alpha)\) and \(\Omega_{\dot{\sigma}}(\dot{\alpha})\) are the spinor components of \(\Omega_{\alpha}(i)\); \(u_{\sigma}=\Omega_{\sigma}(\alpha)\xi_{\alpha}\), \(\partial_{\sigma}=\partial/\partial u_{\sigma}\), while \(u_{\dot{\sigma}}=\Omega_{\dot{\sigma}}(\dot{\alpha})\xi_{\dot{\alpha}}\) (a 4-component vector has the meaning of the bispinor \(x_{\alpha}=\xi_{\gamma}\xi_{\dot{\delta}}\)).

Assuming the locality of \(\varepsilon_a(u_{\sigma})\) and \(\dot{\varepsilon}_a(u_{\dot{\sigma}})\), \(S=1+\varepsilon_a\tau_a\), \(\dot S=1+\dot{\varepsilon}_a\nu_a\), and requiring covariance of (2) with respect to \(S,\dot S\), we obtain:

\[ \partial_{\sigma}\to \partial_{\sigma}-A_{\sigma}^{a}\tau_a,\qquad \partial_{\dot{\sigma}}\to \partial_{\dot{\sigma}}-A_{\dot{\sigma}}^{a}\nu_a, \]

where \(A_{\sigma}^{a}\) and \(A_{\dot{\sigma}}^{a}\) transform in such a way as to compensate the terms:

\[ (\partial_{\sigma}\varepsilon_a)\tau_a\partial_{\dot{\sigma}},\qquad (\partial_{\dot{\sigma}}\dot{\varepsilon}_a)\nu_a\partial_{\sigma}, \]

\[ \tau_a\tau_c\varepsilon_b C^{c}_{pb}A_{\sigma}^{a}A_{\dot{\sigma}}^{a},\qquad \tau_c\nu_p\varepsilon_b A_{\sigma}^{a}A_{\dot{\sigma}}^{p}C^{c}_{ab}, \tag{3} \]

where \(C^{a}_{bc}\) define the algebra of the 3-dimensional orthogonal group: \([A_iA_j]=A_k\) \((ijk=\mathrm{cycl})\). The covariant form of (2) is

\[ \mathscr{L}_{\alpha\dot{\alpha}}\Omega_{\sigma}(\alpha)\Omega_{\dot{\sigma}}(\dot{\alpha}) (\partial_{\sigma}-\tau_a A_{\sigma}^{a}) (\partial_{\dot{\sigma}}-\nu_a A_{\dot{\sigma}}^{a})\psi +m\psi=0. \tag{4} \]

The formula \(\nabla_{\sigma\dot{\sigma}}=\nabla_{\sigma}\nabla_{\dot{\sigma}}\) expresses \(\Delta_{\sigma}(i,k)\) through \(A_{\sigma}^{a}\) and \(A_{\dot{\sigma}}^{a}\). The latter can be written as connection coefficients in spinor spaces:

\[ A_{\sigma}^{a}=C^{b}_{ac}\Omega_{\alpha}(b)\,\partial_{\sigma}\Omega_{\alpha}(c), \]

\[ A_{\dot{\sigma}}^{b}=C^{b}_{ac}\Omega_{\dot{\alpha}}(b)\,\partial_{\dot{\sigma}}\Omega_{\dot{\alpha}}(c). \tag{5} \]

Then \(A_{\sigma}^{a}\) and \(A_{\dot{\sigma}}^{a}\) transform according to formula (3), if \(\Omega_{\alpha}(b)\) and \(\Omega_{\dot{\alpha}}(b)\) transform according to the adjoint groups of the unimodular groups \(S\) and \(\dot S\),

\[ \delta\Omega_{\sigma}(b)=\varepsilon_e C^{b}_{ec}\Omega_{\sigma}(b), \]

\[ \delta\Omega_{\dot{\sigma}}(b)=\dot{\varepsilon}_e C^{b}_{ec}\Omega_{\dot{\sigma}}(c), \]

isomorphic to \(S\) and \(\dot S\) themselves.

Research Institute of Electromechanics
Received
31 VIII 1963

CITED LITERATURE

  1. L. Witten, Phys. Rev., 113, 357 (1959).
  2. É. Cartan, Theory of Spinors, IL, 1947.
  3. G. A. Sokolik, DAN, 148, No. 3 (1963).

Submission history

PHYSICS