A. A. PONOMAREV, I. M. SKVORTSOV, L. N. ASTAKHOVA
Unknown
Submitted 1964-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196401.29828 | Translated from Russian

Abstract

Full Text

A. A. PONOMAREV, I. M. SKVORTSOV, L. N. ASTAKHOVA

ON SOME SUBSTITUTION REACTIONS IN THE 1,2-DIHYDROPYRROLIZINE SERIES

(Presented by Academician A. A. Balandin, 22 VIII 1963)

Until recently, compounds of the 1,2-dihydropyrrolizine series remained almost unstudied. With the appearance of an accessible method for their preparation \((^1)\), it became possible to investigate certain substitution reactions in these bicyclic systems.

The present communication concerns the introduction into the system of 1,2-dihydropyrrolizine and its homologs of formyl, acetyl, oxymethyl, and \(N\)-disubstituted aminomethyl groups. Formylation is readily carried out by the action on 1,2-dihydropyrrolizines of dimethylformamide and phosphorus oxychloride; aldehyde yields are 60–70%. Less satisfactorily (yields about 30%) proceeds the acetylation of similar heterocycles with acetic anhydride. Oxymethylation of 1,2-dihydropyrrolizines occurs on their interaction with aqueous formaldehyde in the presence of potash. The yields reach 67%.

1,2-Dihydropyrrolizines (I) are structurally close to \(N,\alpha\)-alkyl-substituted pyrroles (II). This circumstance makes possible the occurrence of many

\[ \begin{array}{cc} \text{(II)} & \text{(I)} \end{array} \]

substitution reactions in the 1,2-dihydropyrrolizine series just as in pyrroles, i.e., predominantly at position 5. Owing to the positive induction effect of the fatty chain, the electron density in their pyrrole portion is increased in comparison with pyrrole \((^2)\), and substitution reactions should proceed more readily. Experimental proof of the fact that substituents enter the 5-position of 1,2-dihydropyrrolizines was achieved by the method of convergent synthesis. (See the scheme of transformations.)

\[ \begin{array}{ccccc} \text{(III)} & \xrightarrow[\mathrm{POCl_3}]{\mathrm{HCON(CH_3)_2}} & \text{(IV)} & \xrightarrow{\mathrm{H_2N{-}NH_2}} & \text{(V)} \xrightarrow{\mathrm{C_2H_5ONa}} \\ &&&& \\ && \text{(VI)} & \xleftarrow[\ -\mathrm{H_2O}\ ]{\mathrm{Al_2O_3,\ ThO_2}} & \text{(VII)} \end{array} \]

The identity of VI, obtained by two different methods, follows from comparison of their physical constants and infrared spectra (Fig. 1)*.

The point of entry of the oxymethyl group was proved by comparing the constants of a substance obtained by two different routes: from 3-methyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine (III) and 3-methyl-5-formyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine (IV).

* The authors express their gratitude to V. V. Tarasov for taking the IR spectra.

This unambiguously settles the question of substitution in the reactions of oxymethylation and acylation (formylation).

\[ \mathrm{III}\ \xrightarrow[\mathrm{K_2CO_3}]{\mathrm{CH_2O}}\ \text{(VIII)}\ \leftarrow\ \mathrm{IV} \]

The Mannich reaction in the 1,2-dihydropyrrolizine series proceeds successfully. On the basis of the foregoing and by analogy with pyrrole \((^3)\), it should be assumed that substitution in this case also occurs in the 5-position.

By the acylation method, aldehydes (A) and ketones (B) were obtained. By the oxymethylation method, primary alcohols (C) were obtained, and by the Mannich reaction, \(N\)-disubstituted aminomethyl derivatives (D) of 1,2-dihydropyrrolizines were obtained (see Table 1).

A

\[ \text{[structural formula]},\quad \text{where } R=H\ \text{(IX)};\quad R=CH_3\ \text{(IV)} \]

B

\[ \text{[structural formula]}\quad \text{[structural formula (XI)]},\quad \text{where } R=CH_3\ \text{(X)} \]

C

\[ \text{[structural formula]}\quad \text{[structural formula (XVI)]},\quad \begin{aligned} \text{where }& R=H,\ R'=H\ \text{(XII)};\\ & R=H,\ R'=CH_3\ \text{(VIII)};\\ & R=H,\ R'=CH_2{-}CH(CH_3)_2\ \text{(XIII)};\\ & R=C_2H_5,\ R'=CH_3\ \text{(XIV)};\\ & R=CH(CH_3)_2,\ R'=CH_3\ \text{(XV)}. \end{aligned} \]

\[ \text{[structural formula]}\quad \text{[structural formula (XIX)]},\quad \begin{aligned} \text{where }& R=H\ \text{(XVII)};\\ & R=CH_3\ \text{(XVIII)}. \end{aligned} \]

\[ \text{[structural formula]},\quad \begin{aligned} \text{where }& n=1,\ X=CH_2\ \text{(XX)};\\ & n=2,\ X=CH_2\ \text{(XXI)};\\ & n=1,\ X=O\ \text{(XXII)}. \end{aligned} \]

Experimental Part*

The starting 1,2-dihydropyrrolizines were obtained as described earlier \((^1)\). The methods for obtaining their derivatives are illustrated below by examples.

3-Methyl-5-formyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine (IV). Into a 0.5-liter flask are placed 68 ml of dimethylformamide and, with cooling, over 20 min 20 ml of phosphorus oxychloride are added; then at \(10^\circ\), a solution of 24.24 g of (III) in 24 ml of dimethylformamide is introduced dropwise. Stirring is continued for another 30 min, and then the reaction mixture is kept at \(35^\circ\) for 1 hr. Into the flask are introduced 120 g of ice, and with stirring are added

* With the participation of A. A. Khorkina and V. I. Simontsev.

Table 1

Most important physical properties and analyses of derivatives of 1,2-dihydropyrrolizines obtained by substitution methods

Compound no. B.p. (pressure in mm) $n_D^{20}$ $d_4^{20}$ $MR_D$ found $MR_D$ calc. Gross formula C, % found C, % calc. H, % found H, % calc. N, % found N, % calc. Yield, %
IV 96—97 (4 mm) 1.5712 1.0845 45.21 42.38 C₉H₁₁NO 72.35
72.15
72.45 7.35
7.54
7.43 9.34
9.41
9.39 71.7
VIII 112 (4 mm) 1.5405 1.0790 44.00 43.89 C₉H₁₃NO 71.71
71.54
71.49 8.80
8.49
8.67 9.11
9.15
9.26 58.8
IX 108—109 (4.5 mm) 1.5902 1.1325 40.29 37.76 C₈H₉NO 71.12
71.00
71.08 7.18
7.17
6.71 10.42
10.24
10.36 60.1
X 123 (10 mm) 1.5525 1.0606 49.21 46.99 C₁₀H₁₃NO 73.41
73.58
73.58 8.31
8.29
8.02 8.34
9.04
8.58 38.0
XI 131—132 (2 mm) 1.5622 1.0851 60.77 58.65 C₁₃H₁₇NO 76.90
76.74
76.81 8.72
8.50
8.43 6.92
6.94
6.89 31.2
XII 116.5—117 (3.5 mm) 1.5532 1.1185 39.26 39.28 C₈H₁₁NO 70.04
70.07
70.04 8.08
8.30
8.08 10.04
9.96
10.21 55.5
XIII 118—120 (1 mm) 1.5187 1.0142 57.81 57.75 C₁₂H₁₉NO 74.23
74.44
74.57 9.92
9.85
9.91 7.28
7.14
7.25 56.2
XIV 129 (4 mm) 1.5220 1.0231 53.43 53.13 C₁₁H₁₇NO 73.87
73.92
73.70 9.80
9.67
9.56 8.24
8.15
7.81 50.0
XV 119—122 (2 mm) 1.5195 1.0131 57.95 57.75 C₁₂H₁₉NO 75.00
74.96
74.57 9.46
9.95
9.31 7.28
7.23
7.25 66.6
XVI 140—146 (2 mm) 1.5538 1.1035 55.53 55.55 C₁₂H₁₇NO 75.69
75.70
75.35 9.10
9.08
8.96 7.28
7.37
7.32 42.1
XVII 98—99 (8 mm) 1.5150 0.9712 51.00 50.93 C₁₀H₁₆N₂ 73.35
73.19
73.12 9.91
9.70
9.82 16.96
16.94
17.06 68.6
XVIII 104—106 (10 mm) 1.5080 0.9526 55.78 55.54 C₁₁H₁₈N₂ 74.24 74.10 10.42 10.18 16.23
15.76
15.71 62.54
XIX 148—150 (10 mm) 1.5272 0.9933 67.59 67.20 C₁₄H₂₂N₂ 77.26
76.84
77.01 10.12
10.24
10.16 12.68
12.46
12.83 70.1
XX 112—113 (5 mm) 1.5260 0.9898 67.71 67.20 C₁₄H₂₂N₂ 76.87
76.83
77.01 10.15
10.48
10.16 12.81
13.08
12.83 75.5
XXI 140—141 (2 mm) 1.5288 1.9972 71.84 71.82 C₁₅H₂₄N₂ 77.65
77.06
77.53 10.70
10.45
10.41 12.04
11.92
12.06 60.1
XXII 156—158 (10 mm) 1.5285 1.0540 64.42 64.22 C₁₃H₂₀N₂O 70.52
70.67
70.87 9.05
9.33
9.15 12.67
12.39
12.71 61.2

solution of 88 g of sodium hydroxide in 245 ml of water. The oil is extracted with ether and dried with magnesium sulfate. 5-Formyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine (IX) was obtained analogously.

3,5-Dimethyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine (VI).
a) The hydrazone (V), obtained by heating 24 g of 85% hydrazine hydrate with 10 g of (IV) in 25 ml of methanol at 60–70°, is reduced according to Kishner \((^4)\) in the presence of sodium ethylate in ethylene glycol medium. The reaction product is extracted with ether; the ether extracts are washed with 5% sulfuric acid, water, and alkali, and dried over solid KOH. 5.13 g of (VI) was obtained, yield 56.6%. B.p. 79–80° (10 mm), \(d_4^{20}\) 0.9612, \(n_D^{20}\) 1.5139.

Figure 1. 1 — spectrum of VI obtained from III; 2 — spectrum of VI obtained from VII

Fig. 1. 1 — spectrum of VI obtained from III; 2 — spectrum of VI obtained from VII

b) For purposes of comparison, VI, obtained by the previously described method \((^1)\), was additionally purified with a 5% sulfuric acid solution, as described above. B.p. 79° (10 mm), \(d_4^{20}\) 0.9592, \(n_D^{20}\) 1.5136.

3-Methyl-5-oxymethyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine (VIII).
a) A solution of 15.7 g of (IV) in 70 ml of absolute alcohol is placed in an autoclave. Hydrogenation is carried out over Raney nickel at 30–40°. 11.5 g (72.2%) of VIII was obtained. B.p. 103–104° (2.5 mm), \(d_4^{20}\) 1.0786, \(n_D^{20}\) 1.5403.

b) Obtained by method \((^5)\).

Analogously, 5-oxymethyl- (XII), 1-ethyl-3-methyl-5-oxymethyl- (XIV), 1-isopropyl-3-methyl-5-oxymethyl- (XV), 3-isobutyl-5-oxymethyl- (XIII), and 2,3-tetramethylene-5-oxymethyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizines (XVI) were synthesized.

3-Methyl-5-acetyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine (X).
A mixture of 8 g of 3-methyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine, 5 g of fused sodium acetate, and 27 g of acetic anhydride is heated at 140° for 4 h. 2,3-Tetramethylene-5-acetyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine (XI) was obtained analogously.

2,3-Tetramethylene-5-dimethylaminomethyl-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine (XIX).
To 6 g of 2,3-tetramethylene-1,2-dihydropyrrolizine, with stirring, a solution of 3.2 g of dimethylamine hydrochloride in 3.25 g of 35% formalin is added dropwise over 20 min. The mixture is stirred for 3 h and then treated with 15 ml of a 25% NaOH solution. The separated oil is extracted with ether; the extracts are washed with 20 ml of water and dried with calcined sodium sulfate (XIX). Analogously, 5-dimethylaminomethyl- (XVII), 3-methyl-5-dimethylaminomethyl- (XVIII), 3-methyl-5-(N-piperidinomethyl)- (XX), 3-methyl-5-(N-morpholinomethyl)- (XXII), and 3-methyl-5-(N-hexamethyleneiminomethyl)-1,2-dihydropyrrolizines (XXI) were obtained.

Saratov State University
named after N. G. Chernyshevsky

Received
5 VII 1963

References

  1. A. A. Ponomarev, I. M. Skvortsov, ZhOKh, 32, 97 (1962).
  2. A. P. Terent’ev, L. A. Yanovskaya, Usp. khim., 19, 202 (1950).
  3. W. Herz, K. Dittmer, S. Cristol, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 69, 1698 (1947).
  4. Reactions and Methods for the Study of Organic Compounds, 1, 1951, p. 7.
  5. A. A. Ponomarev, I. M. Skvortsov, A. A. Khorkin, ZhOKh, 33, 2687 (1963).

Submission history

A. A. PONOMAREV, I. M. SKVORTSOV, L. N. ASTAKHOVA