Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR A. V. Nikolaev, A. A. Kolesnikov,
Submitted 1964-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196401.38966 | Translated from Russian

Full Text

Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR

  1. Volume 159, No. 2

CHEMISTRY

Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR A. V. Nikolaev, A. A. Kolesnikov,
T. P. Smirnova

EXTRACTION SYSTEM $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3—NH_4NO_3—H_2O—(C_4H_9O)_3PO}$

The distribution coefficient $(D)$ of rare-earth elements varies within wide limits depending on the conditions under which extraction is carried out $({}^{1-5})$. Thus, in the system $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3—HNO_3—H_2O—TBF}$, $D_{\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}}$ changes its value from 0.01 to 1.2 $({}^{1,6,7})$. With successive replacement of $\mathrm{HNO_3}$ by $\mathrm{NaNO_3}$, while maintaining their total concentration at 2 mol/l, $D_{\mathrm{Cl}}$ changes from 0.03 to 17.6 $({}^{8})$. The form in which lanthanum exists in TBF has been established as the trisolvate $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3 \cdot 3TBF}$ $({}^{9})$; the dependence of $D$ on the atomic number of the rare-earth elements has been found $({}^{7})$; and the condition for separation of rare-earth elements with TBF has been established $({}^{2,10})$.

Fig. 1. Extraction system $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3—NH_4NO_3—H_2O—(C_4H_9O)_3PO}$

Fig. 1. Extraction system $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3—NH_4NO_3—H_2O—(C_4H_9O)_3PO}$

However, investigation of phase equilibria not only in individual regions of extraction systems, but over the entire range of their concentrations, is of practical and theoretical interest. The system $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3—NH_4NO_3—H_2O—TBF}$ was studied under isothermal conditions at $25 \pm 0.1^\circ$. The extraction-ray method $({}^{11})$ was used, together with the equilibrium-analysis method for individual points. Lanthanum was determined complexometrically $({}^{12})$, and at microconcentrations (down to $5.22 \cdot 10^{-6}$ mol/l) the radioactive isotope $\mathrm{La}^{140}$ was used. Water was determined by the Fischer method $({}^{13})$, and the ammonium ion by the method of distillation of ammonia. The distribution coefficient was calculated for concentrations in weight percent.

Numerical data on the investigation of phase equilibria in the region of stratification of the system $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3—NH_4NO_3—H_2O—TBF}$ at $25^\circ$ are given in Tables 1 and 2. In Fig. 1, in the field of unsaturated solutions of the solubility diagram of the system $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3—NH_4NO_3—H_2O}$, extraction rays and isolines of the distribution coefficients of lanthanum nitrate and water are plotted.

The distribution coefficients of lanthanum nitrate vary from 0.1 to 70 and higher, depending on the component ratio in the equilibrium state of the system. The isolines of the distribution coefficients (in Fig. 1 indicated by thin lines) have a definite pattern and to some extent resemble the course of isolines in the system $\mathrm{UO_2(NO_3)_2—NH_4NO_3—H_2O—(C_2H_5)_2O}$ $({}^{11})$.

Table 1

Beam no. Point no. Ratio of phase volumes org./aq. Density \(d_4^{25}\), organic phase Density \(d_4^{25}\), aqueous phase Equilibrium concentration, wt. %, \(\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}\), organic phase Equilibrium concentration, wt. %, \(\mathrm{H_2O}\), organic phase Equilibrium concentration, wt. %, \(\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}\), aqueous phase Equilibrium concentration, wt. %, \(\mathrm{NH_4NO_3}\), aqueous phase Distribution coefficient \(D\), \(\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}\) Distribution coefficient \(D\), \(\mathrm{H_2O}\)
I 1 8,85 14,50 4,10 0,60
I 2 8,44 14,31 4,91 0,59
I 3 2,92 6,61 5,17 0,44
I 4 1,29 3,23 5,54 0,40
I 5 0,58 1,56 6,54 0,38
II 6 0,4 1,2125 1,6627 22,5 1,07 40,12 4,12 0,56 0,019
II 7 1,0 1,1948 1,5567 20,77 1,51 34,61 5,21 0,60 0,024
II 8 1,0 1,1670 1,4421 18,2 2,0 29,27 5,49 0,62 0,031
II 9 2,0 1,1149 1,2875 13,0 2,95 20,45 7,11 0,63 0,041
II 10 3,0 1,0493 1,1520 6,9 4,19 10,76 7,98 0,64 0,052
II 11 3,0 1,0025 1,0481 2,77 5,35 4,80 8,07 0,58 0,061
III 12 1,1759 1,5467 19,80 1,48 31,86 9,75 0,62 0,025
III 13 1,1448 1,3899 15,63 2,31 23,19 14,91 0,67 0,037
III 14 1,1073 1,2559 12,50 3,01 14,38 17,13 0,87 0,044
III 15 1,0687 1,1643 8,79 3,78 7,27 18,49 1,21 0,051
III 16 1,0237 1,1152 4,86 4,7 2,82 20,77 1,72 0,062
III 17 0,9948 1,0990 1,74 5,70 0,57 23,42 3,05 0,075
IV 18 1,2384 1,7601 24,85 0,58 45,40 17,12 0,55 0,015
IV 19 1,2149 1,5853 23,10 0,73 34,83 21,00 0,66 0,017
IV 20 1,1761 1,3448 19,16 1,68 20,28 26,99 0,94 0,032
IV 21 1,1135 1,1813 13,26 2,80 7,50 28,46 1,77 0,044
IV 22 1,0363 1,1163 5,95 4,53 1,1 31,6 5,41 0,067
V 23 0,5 1,1154 1,3048 13,03 2,80 3,68 54,36 3,55 0,067
V 24 0,5 1,0650 1,2705 8,35 3,92 0,54 57,51 15,46 0,093

Separate points

Beam no. Point no. Ratio of phase volumes org./aq. Density \(d_4^{25}\), organic phase Density \(d_4^{25}\), aqueous phase Equilibrium concentration, wt. %, \(\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}\), organic phase Equilibrium concentration, wt. %, \(\mathrm{H_2O}\), organic phase Equilibrium concentration, wt. %, \(\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}\), aqueous phase Equilibrium concentration, wt. %, \(\mathrm{NH_4NO_3}\), aqueous phase Distribution coefficient \(D\), \(\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}\) Distribution coefficient \(D\), \(\mathrm{H_2O}\)
25 1,2354 2,2010 24,5 0,88 57,31 0,43 0,021
26 2,000 24,0 0,82 55,05 0,44 0,018
27 1,0 1,2073 1,6506 21,15 1,39 39,75 0,54 0,023
28 1,0 1,1901 1,5901 20,44 1,48 37,26 0,55 0,024
29 1,0 1,1537 1,4410 17,30 2,17 30,07 0,57 0,030
30 1,0 1,1136 1,3072 13,09 2,89 22,70 0,58 0,037
31 1,0 1,0696 1,2025 8,8 3,75 16,05 0,55 0,045
32 1,0 1,0264 1,1410 5,23 4,70 11,65 0,45 0,053
33 1,0 0,9982 1,0875 1,83 5,39 7,81 0,23 0,058
34 1,0 0,9784 1,0470 0,32 5,98 4,34 0,07 0,062
35 0,5 0,9776 1,0469 0,29 5,93 4,28 0,068 0,062
36 27,63 0,38 59,18 8,69 0,47 0,012
37 27,39 0,4 55,98 9,56 0,49 0,012
38 28,18 0,35 54,71 8,95 0,51 0,010
39 27,10 0,49 33,46 34,98 0,81 0,016
40 25,38 0,65 27,09 45,64 0,93 0,024
41 22,80 0,95 15,20 53,80 1,50 0,031
42 22,68 1,16 12,29 55,0 1,85 0,035
43 20,92 1,30 8,00 59,86 2,62 0,040
44 1,0 0,9780 1,3098 0,23 5,97 67,96 0,19
45 1,0 1,0329 1,3082 5,03 4,76 0,16 64,30 31,44 0,13
46 0,5 1,0280 1,1792 5,15 4,75 0,16 38,64 4,44 0,079
47 1,1 0,9778 1,1804 1,08 5,73 0,078 39,88 13,85 0,095
48 0,6 1,1251 1,3713 14,85 2,52 19,09 39,1 0,78 0,049
49 1,1915 1,7418 20,15 1,42 40,30 12,46 0,50 0,030
50 1,1941 1,4480 20,65 1,57 33,85 13,57 0,55 0,030
51 17,86 1,90 26,07 15,68 0,68 0,033
52 16,35 2,22 20,11 17,49 0,80 0,035
53 12,21 3,07 13,20 19,6 1,02 0,046
54 11,48 3,24 9,68 20,8 1,19 0,047
55 1,0190 1,0750 6,32 2,23 3,76 22,37 1,68 0,035
56 1,2009 1,4069 21,27 1,24 32,26 8,50 0,59 0,021
57 1,1944 1,3371 19,32 1,63 30,73 8,49 0,63 0,026
58 1,0319 1,0050 5,87 4,55 9,49 8,16 0,62 0,056
59 1,0751 1,2090 8,80 3,74 14,55 2,39 0,60 0,045

Table 2

Equilibrium concentrations: La\(^{140}\), imp/g × 100 sec (organic phase) Equilibrium concentrations: NH\(_4\)NO\(_3\), wt. % (aqueous phase) Equilibrium concentrations: La\(^{140}\), imp/g × 100 sec (aqueous phase) \(D_{\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}}\) Equilibrium concentrations: La\(^{140}\), imp/g × 100 sec (organic phase) Equilibrium concentrations: NH\(_4\)NO\(_3\), wt. % (aqueous phase) Equilibrium concentrations: La\(^{140}\), imp/g × 100 sec (aqueous phase) \(D_{\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}}\)
94 0.0 2767 0.034 3748 11.45 4279 0.876
1372 2.85 23442 0.054 4913 18.74 2314 2.13
637 3.91 5736 0.110 16994 29.31 2673 6.36
1241 6.73 4808 0.258 6763 45.20 94 71.95

The isolines run fanwise and converge on the ordinate axis. Near the point of 10 wt. % NH\(_4\)NO\(_3\) they deviate in the composition field in different directions. Therefore, for the isolines of \(D_{\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}}\) the entire diagram is, as it were, divided into two parts by the isoconcentrate at 10 wt. % NH\(_4\)NO\(_3\). In the upper part (more than 10%) of the diagram, the extraction of lanthanum increases smoothly with increasing concentration of the salting-out agent NH\(_4\)NO\(_3\) and with decreasing content of lanthanum nitrate. Near the NH\(_4\)NO\(_3\) saturation region, the distribution coefficients rise sharply and reach values of 70 and higher (region of maximum extraction). The sharpest rise in \(D_{\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}}\) is observed at microconcentrations of lanthanum (Table 2), i.e., near the ordinate axis. In the lower part of the diagram, bounded on one side by the abscissa axis and on the other by the isoconcentrate of 10 wt. % NH\(_4\)NO\(_3\), a region of low extraction of lanthanum is located at the origin; it disappears as the contents of both lanthanum and ammonium nitrates increase. In this part of the diagram there is a maximum in the region of 30 wt. % La(NO\(_3\))\(_3\), where \(D_{\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}} = 0.6\)—0.65. With a further increase in the concentration of lanthanum, its extraction falls, and in the region of saturation with lanthanum nitrate \(D_{\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}} = 0.43\).

Fig. 2. Quaternary system La(NO\(_3\))\(_3\)—NH\(_4\)NO\(_3\)—H\(_2\)O—(C\(_4\)H\(_9\)O)\(_3\)PO in the region of stratification

Fig. 2. Quaternary system La(NO\(_3\))\(_3\)—NH\(_4\)NO\(_3\)—H\(_2\)O—(C\(_4\)H\(_9\)O)\(_3\)PO in the region of stratification.

The distribution coefficient of water \(D_{\mathrm{H_2O}}\) in the system varies from 0.01 to 0.19. The isolines of \(D_{\mathrm{H_2O}}\), indicated in Fig. 1 by thin dashed lines, at low lanthanum concentrations run almost parallel to the ordinate axis. Their slope increases with increasing lanthanum concentration, and in the region of high concentrations they form an obtuse angle with the abscissa axis. The maximum value \(D_{\mathrm{H_2O}} = 0.07\)—0.19 is located near the ordinate axis and does not depend on the concentration of NH\(_4\)NO\(_3\), while the minimum \(D_{\mathrm{H_2O}} = 0.015\) is located in the region of the eutonic point (double salt and solid solutions). As can be seen, the distribution of water between tributyl phosphate and the aqueous solution of ammonium and lanthanum nitrates is mainly affected by lanthanum nitrate.*

The extraction rays, indicated in Fig. 1 by Roman numerals, for larg-

* It is capable of displacing water from tributyl phosphate.

…over a greater extent are rectilinear and have an extraction pole corresponding to 100% $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}$, i.e., anhydrous lanthanum nitrate is extracted into the organic phase. The figurative point of the composition moves along the ray toward the ordinate axis and, at a concentration of the salting-out agent $\mathrm{NH_4NO_3}$ of less than 10%, may enter the region of low extraction, where a very large number of extraction stages is required for complete extraction, since $D$ decreases in the region of low concentrations; when the $\mathrm{NH_4NO_3}$ content is more than 10 wt.%, the ray leads to a region where $D$ increases as extraction proceeds, which ensures complete extraction. The upward curvature of the rays in the concentration region $<5\%$ $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}$ is associated with extraction of water, owing to which the concentration of the salting-out agent in the aqueous phase increases.

Extraction of lanthanum by tributyl phosphate with the salting-out agent $\mathrm{NH_4NO_3}$ must be carried out with these features taken into account; for example, it must begin with a definite initial concentration of salting-out agent and lanthanum. In Fig. 2 the system $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3—NH_4NO_3—H_2O—TBP}$ is represented in the form of a tetrahedron. In constructing the diagram, the solubility of TBP in the aqueous phase and of $\mathrm{NH_4NO_3}$ in the organic phase were neglected because of their small values. Thus, the content of $\mathrm{NH_4NO_3}$ in TBP at equilibrium with a saturated solution is 1% (14), and the solubility of TBP in a saturated solution of $\mathrm{NH_4NO_3}$ approaches zero, as special investigations have shown.

The vertices of the tetrahedron correspond to the pure components. The plane of the base corresponds to the aqueous phases of the system, and the compositions of the organic phases in equilibrium with them are represented by the line connecting the points $(\mathrm{C_4H_9O})_3\mathrm{PO}\cdot\mathrm{H_2O}$ and $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}\cdot 3(\mathrm{C_4H_9O})_3\mathrm{PO}$, which lies entirely on the edge $\mathrm{H_2O—(C_4H_9O)_3PO—La(NO_3)_3}$. The thin lines (tie lines) connect the equilibrium compositions in the aqueous and organic parts of the system. The volume enclosed between the conjugate elements of the compositions of the organic phases and the surface of the compositions of the aqueous phases represents the region of stratification of two-phase liquid mixtures. A complete study of the system and the use of the tetrahedron for representation confirm the previously expressed opinion concerning the form in which the compounds exist in the organic phase. It is probable that in the organic phase there exists the compound $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}\cdot 3\mathrm{TBP}$ (Fig. 2). It is interesting that all compositions of the organic phases are, as it were, mixtures of this compound and the compound $\mathrm{TBP}\cdot\mathrm{H_2O}$ (a saturated solution of water in TBP). As the concentration of lanthanum in the system increases, water is displaced to an ever greater extent from the organic phase by lanthanum and, finally, $\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}$ almost completely replaces it; for example, at the concentration of the components in the system corresponding to the point of the equilibrium aqueous phase where $D_{\mathrm{La(NO_3)_3}}=0.49$. The quantitative ratios of the compound formed, as well as of all components of the system, can be determined by the usual methods of phase diagrams.

Since each ray in the aqueous phase corresponds to a conjugate ray in the organic phase (15), it is possible to determine quantitatively the principal parameters of the process: the number of extraction stages, the minimum (relative) solvent consumption, and the compositions of the aqueous and organic phases.

Institute of Inorganic Chemistry
Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR

Received
24 VI 1964

REFERENCES CITED

  1. A. V. Nikolaev, A. A. Kolesnikov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 154, 1395 (1964).
  2. A. V. Nikolaev, A. A. Sorokina, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 129, 341 (1959).
  3. N. E. Brezhneva, V. I. Lenindr., II Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Report 2295, Moscow, 1959.
  4. The Rare Earths, New York—London, 1961, p. 42.
  5. K. K. Kriss, Z. A. Sheka, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 5, 12, 2819 (1960).
  6. A. V. Nikolaev, Proceedings of the Commission on Analytical Chemistry, 14, 31 (1963).
  7. D. F. Peppard et al., J. Inorg. and Nucl. Chem., 5/6, 326 (1957).
  8. I. I. Scargö et al., J. Inorg. and Nucl. Chem., 5/6, 304 (1957).
  9. E. Hesford, C. E. Jackson, H. A. C. McKay, J. Inorg. and Nucl. Chem., 9, 279 (1959).
  10. D. F. Peppard et al., J. Phys. Chem., 57, 294 (1953).
  11. A. V. Nikolaev, A. G. Kurnakova, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 3, 1037 (1958).
  12. J. Körbe, Chemist-Analyst, 45, 4, 102 (1956).
  13. J. Mitchell, D. Smith, Aquametry, 1962, Moscow—Leningrad, p. 68.
  14. I. I. Yakovlev, R. I. Opalovskaya, Izv. SO AN SSSR, No. 12, 62 (1962).
  15. A. V. Nikolaev, I. I. Yakovlev, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 145, No. 5, 1064 (1962).

Submission history

Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR