MATHEMATICS
Unknown
Submitted 1964-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196401.39263 | Translated from Russian

Full Text

MATHEMATICS

P. K. OSMATESKU

A GENERALIZATION OF A THEOREM OF P. S. ALEXANDROV ON ONE-POINT BICOMPACTIFICATION

(Presented by Academician P. S. Alexandrov, 11 II 1964)

The well-known theorem of P. S. Alexandrov on one-point bicompactification \(\left(^{1}\right)\), p. 390, Theorem 9, is generalized to \(T_1\)-spaces for noncontractible bicompact extensions \(\left(^{2}\right)\), Definition 1. I give this definition.

Definition\(^*\). A bicompact \(T_1\)-extension \(bX\) of a space \(X\) is called noncontractible if for no closed set \(F \subset X\) does there exist a bicompact space \(\Phi \subset bX\) such that
\[ [F]_{bX} \supset \Phi \supset F;\qquad \Phi \ne [F]_{bX}. \]

Theorem. Every non-bicompact \(T_1\)-space \(X\) can be noncontractibly bicompactified in a unique way, up to homeomorphism, by adjoining one point \(\xi \notin X\).

Proof. Let \(X\) be a \(T_1\)-space. Put
\[ \alpha X = X \cup \xi,\qquad \xi \notin X. \]
Define a topology in \(\alpha X\) as follows: the open sets in \(\alpha X\) not containing the point \(\xi\) are all the open sets in \(X\), and only them, while the open sets in \(\alpha X\) containing the point \(\xi\) are the sets of the form
\[ \xi \cup (X \setminus \Phi), \]
where \(\Phi \subset X\) is a closed bicompact set. It is easily verified that the axioms of a topological space are satisfied in \(\alpha X\).

The space \(\alpha X\) is bicompact. Indeed, let \(\{U_\alpha\}\) be an arbitrary open covering of the space \(\alpha X\). From \(\{U_\alpha\}\) one can choose a finite subcovering of the space \(\alpha X\), because among the sets \(U_\alpha\) there is some set
\[ U_0 = U_0 \xi = \xi \cup (X \setminus \Phi), \]
and from the remaining sets of the system \(\{U_\alpha\}\), which cover at least \(\Phi\), one can choose a finite system of sets
\[ U_1, U_2, \ldots, U_s, \]
covering \(\Phi\), since \(\Phi\) is bicompact. Then the sets
\[ U_0, U_1, U_2, \ldots, U_s \]
together cover the whole space \(\alpha X\). Thus the bicompactness of the space \(\alpha X\) is proved. It is obvious that \(\alpha X\) is an extension of the space \(X\).

Let us prove the noncontractibility of \(\alpha X\). Let \(F\) be an arbitrary closed set of the space \(X\). If \(F\) is not bicompact, then, by the definition of the topology in \(\alpha X\),
\[ [F]_{\alpha X} = F \cup \xi. \]
Obviously, if the space \(b'F\) is bicompact and
\[ [F]_{\alpha X} \supset b'F \supset F, \]
then
\[ b'F = F \cup \xi, \]
and, consequently,
\[ [F]_{\alpha X} = b'F. \]
If, however, \(F\) is bicompact, then
\[ [F]_{\alpha X} = F, \]
since \(\xi \cup (X \setminus F)\) is a neighborhood of the point \(\xi\) not intersecting \(F\). Therefore, in accordance with the definition, \(\alpha X\) is noncontractible.

Uniqueness. Let \(\alpha X\) and \(\alpha'X\) be two one-point noncontractible bicompact extensions of the space \(X\). We shall prove that they are homeomorphic. Denote by \(\tau\) and \(\tau'\) the topologies in \(\alpha X\) and, respectively, in \(\alpha'X\). Take an arbitrary \(U \in \tau\) for which \(\xi \in U\). Then from the definition of the topologies \(\tau\) and \(\tau'\) it follows that \(U \in \tau'\). Now take any such
\[ V \in \tau,\qquad V \supset \xi. \]
Then the set \(\alpha X \setminus \Phi\) is closed, \(\Phi \subset X\).

By the noncontractibility of the bicompact extension \(\alpha X\), the set \(\Phi\) is bicompact. Hence the set \(V \in \tau'\), consequently,
\[ \tau \subset \tau'. \]
One may interchange the roles of \(\alpha X\) and \(\alpha'X\); therefore
\[ \tau \supset \tau'. \]
Thus we have proved that
\[ \tau = \tau', \]
i.e. \(\alpha X\) and \(\alpha'X\) are homeomorphic. The theorem is proved.

\[ \underline{\hspace{1.2cm}} \]

\(^*\) Introduced by A. V. Arhangel’skii.

In the case of locally bicompact Hausdorff spaces, this unique noncontractible bicompactification by one point coincides with the well-known bicompactification by one point of P. S. Aleksandrov.

For valuable advice in carrying out this work, I express my sincere gratitude to A. V. Arhangel’skii.

Received
4 II 1964

CITED LITERATURE

  1. P. S. Aleksandrov, Introduction to the General Theory of Sets and Functions, Moscow—Leningrad, 1948.
  2. P. K. Osmatesku, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, ser. mathematics and mechanics, No. 6, 45 (1963).

Submission history

MATHEMATICS