R. I. NOVOSELOV, S. V. ZEMSKOV, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR B. V. PTITSYN
Unknown
Submitted 1964-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196401.45364 | Translated from Russian

Abstract

Full Text

CHEMISTRY

R. I. NOVOSELOV, S. V. ZEMSKOV, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR B. V. PTITSYN

ON THE QUESTION OF THE OXIDATION OF TETRAAMMINEPLATINOCHLORIDE BY IODINE

A considerable number of works have been devoted to the study of the oxidation–reduction interaction of Pt^II complexes with halogens, which is of theoretical and applied importance, whereas experimental data confirming one or another reaction mechanism have not yet appeared in the literature. Thus, in considering the question of possible mechanisms for the oxidation of Pt^II complexes, A. A. Grinberg suggested the interaction of an oxidizing agent with a complex having a planar configuration owing to the absence of substituents in the 3-coordinate position (^1). The same idea was also expressed in an earlier work by A. A. Grinberg and B. V. Ptitsyn (^1), as well as in works (^3, ^4). Unfortunately, these considerations, though rather interesting, are hypothetical in character and require direct confirmation.

In the present work an attempt has been made, on the basis of the potentiometric method, to establish experimentally the mechanism of oxidation of tetraammineplatinochloride by iodine; the thermodynamics of this reaction was studied in work (^5).

A platinum electrode was placed in an iodine solution with a concentration of \(2.652 \cdot 10^{-5}\) mol/l, which was prepared by dissolving iodine without addition of KJ in \(0.1 M\) \(H_2SO_4\) in order to suppress hydrolysis. Under these conditions the concentration of hydrolyzed iodine is \(10^{-10}\) mol/l, the amount of which may be neglected. The equilibrium concentration of iodide was calculated from the initial potential by the Nernst equation and proved to be \(5.0 \cdot 10^{-7}\) mol/l. Thus, the formation of the \(J_3^-\) complex may be disregarded; since ammonia has a small trans influence, its replacement by iodide in our experiments may be neglected. Thus, in the iodine solution a potential is established on the platinum electrode, the magnitude of which, \(E_{\tau_0}\), expressed in millivolts at 25°, may be written by the Nernst equation as

\[ E_{\tau_0} = E_0 + 29.5 \lg \frac{[J_2]}{[J^-]^2}. \tag{1} \]

Taking into account that the iodide concentration is small and does not change during the experiment, expression (1) may be written in the following form:

\[ E_{\tau_0} = E'_0 + 29.5 \lg [J_2], \tag{2} \]

i.e., the platinum electrode operates as an iodine electrode of the first kind. After the potential on the platinum electrode had been established, a freshly prepared solution of tetraammineplatinochloride of various concentrations in \(0.1\) N \(H_2SO_4\) was added, and the change of potential with time was recorded with an EPPV-51M electronic potentiometer with an accuracy of \(\pm 0.5\) mV.

In all experiments, addition of \([\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4^{2+}]\) causes a rapid fall of potential owing to a decrease in the equilibrium concentration of iodine. The Nernst equation at time \(\tau\) is written as follows:

\[ E_\tau = E'_0 + 29.5 \lg [J_2 - x]. \tag{3} \]

Subtracting equation (3) from equation (2), from the change in potential \(\Delta E\) we find the remaining equilibrium concentration of iodine according to the equation

\[ \Delta E = 29.5 \lg \frac{[\mathrm{J}_2]}{[\mathrm{J}_2-x]} . \tag{4} \]

The change in potential with time, taking into account the dilution correction for several experiments, as a function of the concentration of the added complex, is shown in Fig. 1.

In all experiments there is a rapid drop in potential, over approximately 2 sec. This drop in potential as a function of the amount of \([\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4]^{2+}\) added is given in Table 1.

The rapid drop in potential may occur as the result of two processes: 1) rapid oxidation of the complex by iodine and 2) addition of iodine along the third coordinate with formation of the complex \([\mathrm{Pt}^{II}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4(\mathrm{J}_2)_2]^{2+}\) and with subsequent self-oxidation to \([\mathrm{Pt}^{IV}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4\mathrm{J}_2]^{2+}\). In both cases a drop in potential should be observed. But if the process proceeded by the first path, no changes in potential, apart from its drop, should have occurred. In fact, as can be seen from Fig. 1, after the instantaneous drop in potential the electrode behaves in a somewhat peculiar way. Three cases are observed:

Fig. 1. Change in potential with time as a function of the concentration of added tetrammineplatochloride.
\(I\) — \(0.72\cdot 10^{-5}\) mol/l,
\(II\) — \(1.43\cdot 10^{-5}\),
\(III\) — \(2.51\cdot 10^{-5}\),
\(IV\) — \(3.94\cdot 10^{-5}\),
\(V\) — \(5.37\cdot 10^{-5}\) mol/l

  1. In experiments where the ratio of the concentration of \(\mathrm{J}_2\) to \([\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4]^{2+}\) was greater than 1, the potential increased with time, i.e., the equilibrium concentration of iodine again increased. Such a change in potential can occur only if, to the square-planar complex,

Table 1

Change in the oxidation potential upon addition of \([\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4]^{2+}\) and calculation of the formation function \(\bar n\)

\(C_{[\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4]^{2+}}\cdot 10^5\), mol/l \(E_h\), mV \(\Delta E\), mV \([\mathrm{J}_2]\), mol/l \(C_{\mathrm{J}_2}\cdot 10^5\), mol/l \(\bar n\)
0 798.0 0
0.72 787.5 10.5 \(1.169\cdot 10^{-5}\) 1.483 2.06
1.07 780.0 18.0 \(0.65\cdot 10^{-5}\) 2.00 1.869
1.43 771.5 26.5 \(0.337\cdot 10^{-5}\) 2.315 1.619
1.79 763.0 35.0 \(0.172\cdot 10^{-5}\) 2.480 1.385
2.51 748.0 50.0 \(5.4\cdot 10^{-7}\) 2.598 1.035
2.86 741.0 57.0 \(3.3\cdot 10^{-7}\) 2.619 0.916
3.58 731.5 66.5 \(1.50\cdot 10^{-7}\) 2.637 0.736
3.94 727 71.0 \(1.0\cdot 10^{-7}\) 2.642 0.670
4.65 721.5 77.5 \(0.60\cdot 10^{-7}\) 2.646 0.569
5.37 718.5 79.5 \(0.5\cdot 10^{-7}\) 2.647 0.492

Note. \(\bar n\) is the Bjerrum formation function, calculated by the formula

\[ \bar n=\left[\frac{C_{\mathrm{J}_2}}{C_{[\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4]^{2+}}}\right], \]

\(C_{\mathrm{J}_2}\) is the concentration of iodine bound in the complex; \([\mathrm{J}_2]\) is the equilibrium concentration of iodine; \(C_{[\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4]^{2+}}\) is the total concentration of tetrammineplatochloride.

\([\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4]^{2+}\), two molecules of \(\mathrm{J}_2\) add at the third coordinate, and \([\mathrm{Pt}^{II}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4(\mathrm{J}_2)_2]^{2+}\) is formed. Then oxidation of \(\mathrm{Pt}^{II}\) to \(\mathrm{Pt}^{IV}\) takes place; the complex \([\mathrm{Pt}^{IV}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4\mathrm{J}_2]^{2+}\) and two iodine radicals are formed, which, recombining, give an iodine molecule, whence the increase in potential. Since the rate constant of recombination is very large, \(K = 1.7 \cdot 10^{12}\ \mathrm{mol}^{-2}\cdot\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) (⁶), the slow stage of the entire oxidation–reduction reaction will be the self-oxidation process of the complex \([\mathrm{Pt}^{II}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4(\mathrm{J}_2)_2]^{2+}\), i.e., the time-unstable complex will be in equilibrium with the initial reactants.

  1. In experiments where the ratio of the concentration of \(\mathrm{J}_2\) to \([\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4]^{2+}\) is less than 1, a further decrease of the potential with time occurs. This can be explained by the fact that one molecule of \(\mathrm{J}_2\) is added, then oxidation occurs and further binding of iodine proceeds, whence the decrease in potential.

  2. In experiments where the ratio of the concentration of \(\mathrm{J}_2\) to \([\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4]^{2+}\) is approximately equal to 1, no further change in potential is observed. This is explained by compensation of both processes, and no change in the concentration of \(\mathrm{J}_2\) occurs.

Calculating the equilibrium concentration of iodine by formula (4), one can, by Bjerrum’s method (⁷), determine the composition and stability constants of these complexes. The results of calculations by this method are presented in Table 1.

The average coordination number \(\bar n\) varies from 0.4 to 2.0, which indicates the formation of the complexes:

\[ \left[ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{J}_2 \\ | \\ \mathrm{Pt}^{II}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4 \end{array} \right]^{2+} \]

and

\[ \left[ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{J}_2 \\ | \\ \mathrm{Pt}^{II}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4 \\ | \\ \mathrm{J}_2 \end{array} \right]^{2+}, \]

the partial stability constants determined by this method being, respectively, \(1.7 \cdot 10^7\) and \(4.1 \cdot 10^5\) at \(\mu = 0.1\) and a temperature of \(25^\circ\).

Thus, the mechanism of oxidation of tetrammineplatochloride by iodine is expressed by the following scheme:

\[ [\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4]^{2+} + 2\mathrm{J}_2 \rightleftarrows \left[ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{J}_2 \\ | \\ \mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4 \\ | \\ \mathrm{J}_2 \end{array} \right]^{2+} \rightleftarrows \left[ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{J} \\ | \\ \mathrm{Pt}^{IV}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4 \\ | \\ \mathrm{J} \end{array} \right]^{2+} + 2\mathrm{J}\cdot \rightleftarrows [\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{NH}_3)_4\mathrm{J}_2]^{2+} + \mathrm{J}_2. \]

It appears very probable that this mechanism occurs in the oxidation of complexes with a planar configuration by various halogens.

Institute of Inorganic Chemistry
Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR

Received
1 VI 1964

CITED LITERATURE

¹ A. A. Grinberg, Introduction to the Chemistry of Complex Compounds, Moscow–Leningrad, 1951, p. 340.
² A. A. Grinberg, B. V. Ptitsyn, Izv. Inst. po izucheniyu platiny i drugikh blagorodnykh metallov, No. 11, 77 (1933).
³ A. A. Grinberg, E. N. Inkova, ZhNKh, 3, No. 6, 1315 (1958).
⁴ S. S. Batsanov, Electronegativities of Elements and Chemical Bonding, Novosibirsk, 1962, p. 161.
⁵ A. A. Grinberg, B. Z. Orlova, ZhNKh, 21, No. 11, 1083 (1948).
⁶ U. Uolling, Free Radicals in Solution, IL, 1960, p. 299.
⁷ J. Bjerrum, Formation of Metal Ammine Complexes in Aqueous Solution, IL, 1961, p. 38.

Submission history

R. I. NOVOSELOV, S. V. ZEMSKOV, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR B. V. PTITSYN