Chemistry
Academician B. A. ARBUZOV, O. A. ERASTOV, A. B. REMIZOV
Submitted 1965-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196501.20900 | Translated from Russian

Abstract

Full Text

Chemistry

Academician B. A. ARBUZOV, O. A. ERASTOV, A. B. REMIZOV

SPECTROSCOPIC STUDY OF THE TAUTOMERISM OF THE METHYL AND ETHYL ESTERS OF 4-KETOTETRAHYDROTHIOPYRAN-3-CARBOXYLIC ACID

The esters of 4-ketotetrahydrothiopyran-3-carboxylic acid I should, analogously to the esters of cyclohexanone-1-carboxylic-2 acid, possess keto–enol tautomerism.

[
\begin{array}{c}
\text{[structural formula: keto form]} \rightleftharpoons \text{[structural formula: enol form]} \
\mathrm{I}
\end{array}
]

We found no data in the literature on the study of the indicated tautomerism, which prompted us to carry out the present investigation.

All attempts to select suitable conditions for determining the enolic form of esters I by chemical means, because of the presence of the sulfur atom, did not give satisfactory results. At the same time it seemed of interest to elucidate the influence of the sulfur atom on the tautomerism of these esters by comparing their spectra with the spectra of esters of cyclohexanone-1-carboxylic-2 acid.

As examples we took the ethyl and methyl esters of 4-ketotetrahydrothiopyran-3-carboxylic acid (I and II) and, for comparison, the ethyl and methyl esters of cyclohexanone-1-carboxylic-2 acid (III and IV). Ethyl ester I was obtained according to (¹) and had the following constants: b.p. 129–130°/8, (n_D^{25}) 1.5282. On cooling it partially crystallizes. The crystals pressed on a porous plate had m.p. 58°. Methyl ester II, described as a liquid (²), crystallizes completely upon seeding. After recrystallization the crystals had m.p. 68°. Constants of the ester: b.p. 97–100°/2, (n_D^{25}) 1.5250. Ethyl ester III was obtained according to (³) and had the following constants: b.p. 115–117°/18, (n_D^{25}) 1.4772.

Methyl ester IV was obtained analogously to ethyl ester III. Its constants: b.p. 103–105°/17, (n_D^{25}) 1.4832.

The spectrum of liquid ethyl ester I is presented in Fig. 1a. As is seen, in it, along with the keto form ((C{=}O_{\text{ester}}) 1740 cm(^{-1}), (C{=}O_{\text{keto}}) 1712 cm(^{-1})), a considerable amount of the enolic form is present ((C{=}O_{\text{chelated}}) 1657 cm(^{-1}), (C{=}C) 1614 cm(^{-1})). The spectrum of liquid methyl ester II is analogous to the spectrum of liquid ethyl ester I.

The spectrum of solid methyl ester II (m.p. 68°, KBr pellet 1:1000) is given in Fig. 1b. As is seen, it represents the pure keto form ((C{=}O_{\text{ester}}) 1731 cm(^{-1}), (C{=}O_{\text{keto}}) 1700 cm(^{-1})). The same spectrum was also obtained in Vaseline oil (Fig. 1c). The spectrum of solid ethyl ester I (m.p. 58°) is analogous to the spectrum of solid methyl ester II.

In Fig. 1g, d are given the spectra of esters III and IV. From comparison of the spectra it is seen that, in the equilibrium of esters III and IV, the enolic form predominates (74.2 and 72.4%, respectively)*. Replacement of the CH(_2) group in the ring by sulfur leads to a decrease in the enol content.

* The titration was carried out by a modified method (⁴).

For studying the influence of solvents on the keto–enol equilibrium, solutions of the keto form of methyl ester II were prepared in isobutyl alcohol, CCl₄, and hexane (0.1 N). In the case of ethyl ester I, the solutions were prepared from the liquid phase (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 presents the spectra of the esters in isobutyl alcohol after equilibrium had been established. As is seen from the spectra, esters I (Fig. 3a), III (Fig. 3b), and IV (Fig. 3c) contain a considerable and approximately equal amount of the enol form. Methyl ester III contains less enol (Fig. 3b).

In carbon tetrachloride, for esters III (Fig. 3d) and IV (Fig. 3e), after 12 days a considerable decrease in the content of the keto form is observed in comparison with its content in the esters before dissolution (Figs. 1c and d, respectively).

In the case of esters I and II, the conversion of the keto form into the enol form in nonpolar solvents proceeds more slowly, as is seen from the example of solutions of the keto form of methyl ester II (Fig. 2).

After standing for 15 days, the solution in CCl₄ contains only the keto form (Fig. 2c), and only after standing for 47 days at room temperature does a considerable amount of the enol form appear (Fig. 2d). Passing hydrogen chloride into the solution sharply increases the content of the enol form (Fig. 2e). The same occurs in the hexane solution (Figs. 2g, h).

An analogous picture is also observed for ethyl ester I in CCl₄.

Figure 2a gives the spectrum of ethyl ester I in CCl₄ after 10 days of standing. As can be seen, the spectrum differs substantially from the spectrum of the substance from which the solution was prepared (Fig. 1a). When hydrogen chloride is passed into the solution, a considerable increase in the content of the enol form occurs (Fig. 2b). On further standing, the character of the solution spectrum does not change.

The iodomethylate of methyl ester II was obtained (m.p. 122°, calculated in %: C 30.39; H 4.44; found %: C 30.53; H 4.40). As can be seen from the spectrum (Fig. 2f), it is an enol.

Fig. 1

In Table 1 a comparison is made of the characteristic frequencies of the esters in the solid and liquid states and in solvents. As is seen from the comparison, replacement of the CH₂ group in the ring by sulfur does not cause changes in the characteristic frequencies of the enol form. From Table 1 it is seen that

the frequencies of the carbonyl groups in the solid esters I and II are considerably lower than in their solutions in nonpolar solvents. It is not excluded that such a lowering of the frequency of the carbonyl groups may occur as a result of intermolecular interaction of the sulfur atom with the carbonyl oxygen ((\mathrm{S}^{\delta+}\cdots \mathrm{O}^{\delta-}=\mathrm{C})), similarly to the way this is recognized by Leonard and co-workers (7) for the transannular interaction of sulfur and carbonyl oxygen in some cyclic thioketones.

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

The UV spectra of the esters were recorded (see Table 2).

To determine at least the approximate enol content in solutions of esters I and II, we made use of the fact that, in isobutanol solutions of esters I and III, approximately the same amount of enol is present according to the IR spectra. Using the literature data of bromometric

Table 1

Characteristic frequencies of the esters

I II III IV I II III IV
A. (\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{ef.}}) 1742 1738 1746 1751 V. (\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{ef.}}) 1747 1752 1744 1750
(\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{ket.}}) 1714 1710 1717 1720 (\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{ket.}}) 1719 1723 1720 1724
(\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{chel.}}) 1657 1662 1653 1656 (\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{chel.}}) 1664 1659 1656 1658
(\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{C}) 1614 1614 1620 1618 (\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{C}) 1614 1613 1618 1617
B. (\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{ef.}}) 1735 1735 1738 1737 G. (\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{ef.}}) 1728 1731
(\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{ket.}}) 1714 1712 1719 1717 (\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{ket.}}) 1700 1700
(\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{O}_{\text{chel.}}) 1657 1652 1650 1658
(\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{C}) 1614 1614 1620 1617

Note. A—liquid, B—in isobutanol, V—in hexane and (\mathrm{CCl}_4), G—solid. Assignment of the frequencies according to (8, 9).

titration of ester III in methanol and ethanol, from the UV spectra we calculated the enol content in the isobutanol solution of ester III and adopted the figure obtained as the enol content in an isobutanol solu-

of ester I. We then calculated the absorption of 100% enol of esters I, II and III, IV in isobutanol solution and, with its aid, determined the enol content in the remaining solutions. It is considered that this method gives a good

Table 2

UV absorption and enol content in the esters

Solvent I $\lambda_{\max}$ I $\varepsilon$ I % II $\lambda_{\max}$ II $\varepsilon$ II % III $\lambda_{\max}$ III $\varepsilon$ III % IV $\lambda_{\max}$ IV $\varepsilon$ IV %
Methanol 254 3590 41 254 2890 34 257 4700 45(8) 257 4200 41
Ethanol 254 4700 55 254 3590 42 257 5880 57(9) 257 5890 57
Butanol 254 5590 65 254 4550 53 257 6750 65 257 7000 67

approximation when the absorption maximum is constant(10), which is fulfilled in our case.

Kazan State University
named after V. I. Ulyanov (Lenin)

Received
5 X 1964

REFERENCES

  1. G. Bennet, L. Scorah, J. Chem. Soc., 1927, 194.
  2. E. Fehnel, M. Carmach, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 70, 1813 (1948).
  3. H. Snyder, L. Brooks, S. Shapiro, Syntheses of Organic Preparations, collection 2, Moscow, 1949, p. 410.
  4. W. Dieckmann, Ber., 55, 2470 (1922).
  5. N. J. Leonard, H. S. Gutowsky et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 74, no. 16, 4070 (1952).
  6. S. J. Rhoads, J. C. Gilbert et al., Tetrahedron, 19, no. 11, 1625 (1963).
  7. N. J. Leonard, T. W. Milligan, T. L. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82, 4075 (1960).
  8. M. I. Kabachnik, S. T. Ioffe, K. V. Vatsuro, Tetrahedron, 1, 317 (1957).
  9. G. Schwarzenbach, M. Zimmermann, V. Prelog, Helv. chim. acta, 34, 1954 (1951).
  10. O. Ya. Neiland, G. Ya. Vanag, Usp. khim., vol. 4, 447 (1959).

Submission history

Chemistry