Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
R. V. GOLOVNYA, G. A. MIRONOV, I. P. ZHURAVLEVA
Submitted 1965-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196501.35689 | Translated from Russian

Abstract

Full Text

Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR

  1. Volume 163, No. 2

CHEMISTRY

R. V. GOLOVNYA, G. A. MIRONOV, I. P. ZHURAVLEVA

A GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHIC STANDARDLESS METHOD FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF n-ALIPHATIC AMINES

(Presented by Academician A. N. Nesmeyanov on January 6, 1965)

In gas-chromatographic analyses, standard substances are usually used for identification; in the case of complex mixtures these sometimes have to be specially synthesized. In this connection, the development of analytical methods that do not require the use of standards becomes important.

We have proposed a gas-chromatographic standardless method for identifying primary, secondary, and tertiary n-aliphatic amines. The method is based on the ability of amines to form hydrogen bonds with polar liquid phases. The difference in the strength of this interaction made it possible to develop a method for identifying amines. To characterize the substances leaving the column, Kovats indices \((^{1,2})\) were chosen, in which a series of n-hydrocarbons is taken for comparison.

It is known that gas-chromatographic analysis of n-aliphatic amines presents a certain difficulty because of their adsorption on the support. To reduce adsorption of amines, the wetting preparation “Novator” \((^{3})\) was chosen as the support; Vaseline oil, tristearin, PEG-1000, and Tween-80 were used as liquid phases. Primary amines from methylamine to heptylamine, secondary amines from dimethylamine to diamylamine, and tertiary amines from trimethylamine to triamylamine inclusive were investigated.

The analysis was carried out on a “Panchromatograph” from the firm “Pye,” simultaneously on two columns with flame-ionization and β-ionization detectors. The retention indices of the amines studied were determined by the Kovats formula:

\[ I = 100 \frac{\lg V_{Ax} - \lg V_n}{\lg V_{n+1} - \lg V_n} + 100n, \]

where \(n + 1 > x > n\), \(I\) is the retention index of an amine with \(x\) carbon atoms, \(V_{Ax}\) is the corrected retained volume of the amine under study, \(V_n\) is the corrected retained volume of a hydrocarbon with \(n\) carbon atoms, and \(V_{n+1}\) is the corrected retained volume of an n-hydrocarbon with \((n+1)\) carbon atoms.

For calculating the retention index of amines with short retention times, the accuracy of determining the position of the air peak is of great importance. Since the detectors used in the work are insensitive to air, the position of the air peak was determined by an analytical method according to the modified Evans and Smith procedure \((^{4})\).

The corrected retained volumes of n-hydrocarbons were calculated using a calibration line computed by the method of least squares from data on the chromatographic analysis of n-hydrocarbons from pentane to dodecane inclusive.

The resulting equation \(\lg V_n = a + bn\) makes it possible to determine the corrected retained volumes of any n-hydrocarbon needed for calculating the index. In practice, if the gas-flow rate po-

Table 1

Retention indices of n-aliphatic amines

Substance TC VM TV PEG Substance TC VM TV PEG
Methylamine 465 460 560 777 Diethylamine 595 609 714 780
Ethylamine 470 565 668 764 Dipropylamine 777 780 873 934
Propylamine 583 687 759 866 Dibutylamine 977 973 1064 1126
Butylamine 682 785 863 965 Diamylamine 1174 1172 1264 1330
Amylamine 786 888 960 1071 Trimethylamine 467 445 530 558
Hexylamine 887 987 1060 1170 Triethylamine 691 684 745 778
Heptylamine 985 1087 1164 1271 Tripropylamine 927 924 952 965
Dimethylamine 467 450 604 684 Tributylamine 1184 1179 1201 1203
Triamylamine 1438 1439 1456 1480

Columns (150 cm, 4 mm): 10% tristearin (TC), 109 Tween-80 (TV), 10% PEG-1000 and 2% NaOH + 5% vaseline oil (VM) on “Novator”; temperature 100°, carrier-gas flow rate 10–200 ml/min depending on the boiling point of the amine; CHTT 800–1000 for tripropylamine.

constant in the analysis of the substances studied and of the n-hydrocarbons taken for comparison, then the reduced retention times are substituted into the formula. The calculated retention indices no longer depend on the carrier-gas flow rate.

Table 1 gives the retention indices we found for 17 n-aliphatic amines.

The accuracy of determining the indices is ±6 units for the first two members of each series, and ±2 units for the remaining amines. Complete separation of amines was observed when the indices differed by 20 units.

As is evident from the data in Table 1, for all amines the retention indices increase on passing from a nonpolar to a polar phase. The maximum increase is observed in the series of primary amines on PEG-1000, and the minimum increase in indices is found for tertiary amines. The difference between the retention indices on polar and nonpolar phases makes it possible to assess the degree of interaction of primary and secondary amines with the phase.

For each of the liquid phases studied, the index values found for primary amines can be described, within the accuracy of index determination, by the equation of a straight line:

\[ I_{\mathrm{TC}} = 100n + 285;\qquad I_{\mathrm{VM}} = 100n + 385; \]

\[ I_{\mathrm{TV}} = 100n + 460;\qquad I_{\mathrm{PEG}} = 100n + 570. \]

The equations obtained reflect the homologous dependence of the retention indices of primary n-aliphatic amines on the increase in the number of carbon atoms.

In the case of tertiary amines, the minimal difference in indices on passing from nonpolar to polar phases is associated with the weak interaction of the free electron pair of the amino group with the mobile hydrogen of the liquid phase. For them, a dependence of the retention indices on the number of carbon atoms in the amine is observed, which is expressed by the equation

\[ I_{\mathrm{VM}} = 86n + 146. \]

Of considerable interest is the relationship we found between the retention indices and the boiling temperature for primary n-aliphatic amines. For tertiary and secondary amines such a relationship is observed only on columns with vaseline oil. The equations obtained, given in Table 2, can be used to calculate indices from the boiling temperature of amines.

Table 2

Dependence of retention indices on the boiling temperature of amines

Equations Amine \(I_{\mathrm{VM}}\) \(I_{\mathrm{TS}}\) \(I_{\mathrm{TV}}\) \(I_{\mathrm{PEG}}\) Boiling temp. according to literature data, °C
\(I_{\mathrm{TS}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 94)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{VM}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 116)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{TV}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 135)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{PEG}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 164)\)
Propylamine 55 54 54 52 49—50
\(I_{\mathrm{TS}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 94)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{VM}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 116)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{TV}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 135)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{PEG}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 164)\)
Butylamine 80 80 78 75 78—79
\(I_{\mathrm{TS}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 94)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{VM}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 116)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{TV}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 135)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{PEG}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 164)\)
Amylamine 106 105 105 102 104
\(I_{\mathrm{TS}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 94)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{VM}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 116)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{TV}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 135)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{PEG}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 164)\)
Hexylamine 130 130 129 128 130
\(I_{\mathrm{TS}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 94)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{VM}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 116)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{TV}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 135)\)
\(I_{\mathrm{PEG}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 164)\)
Heptylamine 155 155 156 153 155
\(I_{\mathrm{VM}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 79)\) Triethylamine 92 89
\(I_{\mathrm{VM}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 79)\) Tripropylamine 152 156
\(I_{\mathrm{VM}} = 4.0\,(\text{b.p.} + 79)\) Tributylamine 215 216

\(I_{\mathrm{VM}}, I_{\mathrm{TS}}, I_{\mathrm{TV}}, I_{\mathrm{PEG}}\) are the retention indices of amines on columns with vaseline oil, tristearin, Tween-80, and PEG-1000.

The easy reproducibility of the retention indices, as well as the constancy of the differences of the indices, were used for identifying mixtures of amines even in the absence of complete separation on each of the phases studied. As can be seen from the data in Table 3, the difference of the indices is characteristic for each series of amines. Thus, for example, for primary amines the difference of the retention indices on PEG-1000 and tristearin is maximal and is equal to \(\simeq 285\), while on PEG-1000 and Tween-80 it is \(\simeq 110\).

Thus, in analyzing a mixture of \(n\)-aliphatic amines it is sufficient to compare the chromatograms and to match the retention indices on three

Table 3

Differences of retention indices of \(n\)-aliphatic amines

Amine \(\Delta I_1\) \(\Delta I_2\) Amine \(\Delta I_2\)
Methylamine 279 164 Diethylamine 65
Ethylamine 294 96 Dipropylamine 60
Propylamine 283 108 Dibutylamine 62
Butylamine 283 102 Diamylamine 65
Amylamine 285 114 Trimethylamine 30
Hexylamine 283 110 Triethylamine 30
Heptylamine 286 110 Tripropylamine 13
Dimethylamine 80 Tributylamine 0
Triamylamine 24

\[ \Delta I_1 = I_{\mathrm{PEG}} - I_{\mathrm{TS}} \]

\[ \Delta I_2 = I_{\mathrm{PEG}} - I_{\mathrm{TV}} \]

liquid phases: tristearin, Tween-80, and PEG-1000. From the difference of the indices, the primary, secondary, and tertiary amines are determined; these are then readily identified from the magnitude of the index.

We express our sincere gratitude to Academician A. N. Nesmeyanov for valuable advice and discussion of the results of the work.

Institute of Organoelement Compounds
Academy of Sciences of the USSR

Received
6 I 1965

CITED LITERATURE

  1. E. Kováts, Helv. chim. acta, 41, 1915 (1958).
  2. A. Wehrli, E. Kováts, Helv. chim. acta, 42, 2709 (1959).
  3. An. N. Nesmeyanov, E. V. Avdonina, Vestn. Moskovsk. univ., Khimiya, No. 5, 38 (1962).
  4. M. V. Evans, J. E. Smith, J. Chromatogr., 6, 293 (1961).

Submission history

Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR