Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR A. P. Terent’ev, R. A. Gracheva,
T. F. Dedenko
Submitted 1965-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196501.37064 | Translated from Russian

Full Text

CHEMISTRY

Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR A. P. Terent’ev, R. A. Gracheva,
T. F. Dedenko

SYNTHESIS OF OPTICAL ISOMERS OF β-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID

Racemic β-aminobutyric acid is usually obtained by addition of ammonia to crotonic acid \((^1)\). Addition of benzylamine \((^2)\) to crotonic acid with subsequent hydrogenolysis of the N-substituted acid also leads to an optically inactive acid. At present, for the synthesis of β-amino acids, including β-aminobutyric acid, a method is widely used that consists in the interaction of aldehydes, malonic acid, and ammonia \((^3)\).

In optically active form, β-aminobutyric acid was first obtained by Fischer \((^4)\) by resolution of the racemate with camphorsulfonic acid. Racemic β-aminobutyric acid was obtained by him by hydrogenation of the phenylhydrazone of acetoacetic ester. Later \((^5)\), β-aminobutyric acid was resolved with the aid of optically active α-phenylethylamine. In 1952 Balenovich and co-workers \((^6)\) synthesized optically active \((+)\)-β-aminobutyric acid, applying the Arndt—Eistert reaction to \((-)\)-1-diazo-3-phthalimidobutan-2-one, obtained from \(L\)-alanine. The specific rotation of β-aminobutyric acid was \(+38.80^\circ\). Somewhat later the configuration of β-aminobutyric acid was established. \((+)\)-β-Aminobutyric and \(L\)-α-aminobutyric acids were converted to 2-phthalimidobutane, and, by analogy with α-amino acids, β-aminobutyric acid was assigned to the \(L\)-series \((^7)\).

\[ \begin{array}{ccc} \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CH_2COOH}\\ |\\ \mathrm{H_2N{-}C{-}H}\\ |\\ \mathrm{CH_3} \end{array} & \longrightarrow & \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CH_2CH_3}\\ |\\ \mathrm{C_6H_4(CO)_2N{-}C{-}H}\\ |\\ \mathrm{CH_3} \end{array} \longleftarrow \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{COOH}\\ |\\ \mathrm{H_2N{-}C{-}H}\\ |\\ \mathrm{CH_2CH_3} \end{array} \\[1em] (+)\ \text{3s-aminobutyric acid} && (-)\ \text{2s-aminobutyric acid} \end{array} \]

In the present work we propose a new method for the synthesis of both antipodes of β-aminobutyric acid, starting from crotonic acid and optically active α-phenylethylamine.

\[ \mathrm{CH_3CH{=}CHCOOH} + \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{C_6H_5\overset{*}{CH}CH_3}\\ |\\ \mathrm{NH_2} \end{array} \rightarrow \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CH_3\overset{*}{CH}CH_2COOH}\\ |\\ \mathrm{NH\overset{*}{CH}CH_3}\\ |\\ \mathrm{C_6H_5} \end{array} \rightarrow \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CH_3\overset{*}{CH}CH_2COOH}\\ |\\ \mathrm{NH_2} \end{array} \]

\[ \begin{array}{cccc} \text{(I)} & \text{(II)} & \text{(IIIa, IIIb, IIIc, IIId)} & \text{(IV)} \end{array} \]

When one of the antipodes of α-phenylethylamine is added to crotonic acid, two diastereomeric forms of N-substituted β-aminobutyric acid are formed. We separated the diastereomers IIIa and IIIb, using the greater solubility of one of them in acetone. When using α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20} -41^\circ\), we isolated the N-substituted β-aminobutyric acids IIIa with \([\alpha]_D^{20} +21.99^\circ\) (yield 27%) and IIIb with \([\alpha]_D^{20} -44.82^\circ\) (yield 38.5%).

By hydrogenolysis of the N-substituted acids, \((+)\)-β-aminobutyric acid with \([\alpha]_D^{20} +35.69^\circ\) (92% optical purity) and \((-)\)-β-aminobutyric acid with \([\alpha]_D^{20} -33.91^\circ\) (87.4% optical purity) were obtained. In the case of addition

to crotonic acid, $\alpha$-phenylethylamine with $[\alpha]_D^{20} +41^\circ$ gave N-substituted $\beta$-aminobutyric acids—IIIc with $[\alpha]_D^{20} -18.29^\circ$ (yield 28.8%) and IIIa with $[\alpha]_D^{20} +30.69^\circ$ (yield 42.3%). Hydrolysis of the N-substituted acids IIIc and IIIa led to $\beta$-aminobutyric acids with $[\alpha]_D^{20} -34.91^\circ$ (90% optical purity) and with $[\alpha]_D^{20} +31.25^\circ$ (81% optical purity). The total yield of the N-substituted $\beta$-aminobutyric acids IIIa and IIIb (IIIc and IIId) in both cases is $\sim 70\%$.

Table 1

Experimental data*

Name of acid Yield, % M.p., °C (Butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1) $[\alpha]_D^{20}$, H₂O $[\alpha]_D^{20}$, 2 N NaOH $[\alpha]_D^{20}$, 2 N HCl
(−) $\alpha$-Phenylethylamine
(+) 3$\sigma$-(N-Phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid 27 187–8 0.69 +21.99°; C = 1.4 −32.1°; C = 0.9 −6.66°; C = 1.2
(−) 3$\beta$-(N-Phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid 38.5 150–151 0.69 −44.82°; C = 1.5 −71.08°; C = 1.4 −28.19°; C = 1.4
(+) 3$\sigma$-Aminobutyric acid quant. 215–216 0.21 +35.69°; C = 2; $t = 21^\circ$ +12.65°; C = 0.9 +16.26°; C = 1
(−) 3$\beta$-Aminobutyric acid quant. 216 0.21 −33.91°; C = 1
(+) $\alpha$-Phenylethylamine
(−) 3$\beta$-(N-Phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid 28.8 187–9 0.69 −18.29°; C = 1.4 +32.45°; C = 1.8 +4.5°; C = 1.5
(+) 3$\sigma$-(N-Phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid 42.3 145–7 0.69 +30.69°; C = 1.5 +53.43°; C = 1.4 +18.95°; C = 1.4
(−) 3$\beta$-Aminobutyric acid quant. 215–6 0.21 −34.91°; C = 2.2; $t = 21^\circ$ −12.66°; C = 1.2 −18.5°; C = 1.2
(+) 3$\sigma$-Aminobutyric acid quant. 215–7 0.21 +31.25°; C = 0.9 +11.02°; C = 0.8 +14.4°; C = 0.9

* Literature data: (+) $\beta$-aminobutyric acid—m.p. 200°; $[\alpha]_D^{20} +35.3^\circ$ (C = 9.6; H₂O); $[\alpha]_D^{20} +14.7^\circ$ (C = 9.8; 1 N NaOH) (4); $[\alpha]_D^{20} +29.7^\circ$ (C = 10; 1 N HCl); $[\alpha]_D^{18} +38.8^\circ$ (C = 0.5; H₂O) (6); (−) $\beta$-aminobutyric acid—m.p. 220°; $[\alpha]_D^{20} -35.2^\circ$ (C = 10; H₂O) (4).

By the method proposed by us, one of the diastereomers is isolated in the predominant amount ($\sim$ by 14%). In order to decide the question of asymmetric induction in this reaction, we carried out hydrolysis of the mixture of diastereomers IIIa and IIIb (without separation) from $\alpha$-phenylethylamine

Table 2

Molecular rotations of $\beta$-aminobutyric acids from (+) $\alpha$-phenylethylamine*

Wavelength (+) 3$\sigma$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, H₂O (+) 3$\sigma$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, 2 N NaOH (+) 3$\sigma$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, 2 N HCl (−) 3$\beta$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, H₂O (−) 3$\beta$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, 2 N NaOH (−) 3$\beta$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, 2 N HCl (−) 3$\beta$-Aminobutyric acid, H₂O (−) 3$\beta$-Aminobutyric acid, 2 N NaOH (−) 3$\beta$-Aminobutyric acid, 2 N HCl
589 +60.07° +110.54° +39.23° −28.98° +57.28° +9.18° −35.14° −12.63° −19.15°
578 +69.16° +125.44° +42.02° −36.63° +72.04° +12.01° −40.17° −14.25° −21.83°
546 +70.38° +141.79° +49.06° −47.15° +85.49° +12.71° −46.04° −17.13° −24.77°
436 +114.88° +249.6° +80.04° −52.39° +135.99° +27.32° −71.89° −20.35° −28.58°
405 +137.03° +304.91° +99.36° −57.63° +164.33° +34.36° −85.34° −25.20° −35.20°
382 −83.64° +216.11° +38.71° −93.93° −32.75° −37.09°
365 +469.68° +840.83° +252.23° −95.5° −109.3° −34.49° −45.02°
356 −105.42° −115.26° −46.33°
334 +600.09° +1074.3° +230.69° −145.55° −53.37°
313 +704.63° +1357.9° +392.26° −169.3° −57.17°
302 +783.87° +1548.36° +432.60° −173.89° −56.67°
297 +838.97° +1643.2° +453.33° −175° −58.60°

* Values of the molecular rotations are given for only one antipode of $\beta$-aminobutyric acid.

with $[\alpha]_D^{20} -41^\circ$. After removal of the impurity of optically active $\alpha$-phenylethylamine, the rotation of the acidic solution of $\beta$-aminobutyric acid was measured. At the sodium D-line it proved to be $-4^\circ$. Thus, both experiments on the separation of diastereomers and experiments without separation indicate

for the fact that, on addition of optically active α-phenylethylamine to crotonic acid, asymmetric induction is observed.

For conclusions about the regularities of this reaction, further accumulation of experimental material is necessary.

For β-aminobutyric and N-substituted β-aminobutyric acids we have, for the first time, recorded optical rotatory dispersion curves. In Fig. 1 are shown the ORD curves of acids obtained using (−)-α-phenylethylamine; Table 2 gives the values of molecular rotations for β-aminobutyric acids isolated using (+)-α-phenylethylamine. To designate the configurations of optically active β-aminobutyric acids we used the ρ—σ system proposed by Terent’ev and co-workers (8).

Figure 1

Fig. 1. 1 — 3σ-aminobutyric acid in 2 N NaOH; 2 — (+)3σ-aminobutyric acid in 2 N HCl; 3 — (+)3σ-aminobutyric acid in H₂O; 4 — (+)3σ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in H₂O; 5 — (+)3σ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in 2 N HCl; 6 — (+)3σ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in 2 N NaOH; 7 — (−)3ρ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in H₂O; 8 — (−)3ρ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in 2 N NaOH; 9 — (−)3ρ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in 2 N HCl.

Experimental Part

Racemic β-N-phenylethylaminobutyric acid (III). To a solution of 2.2 g (0.026 mole) of crotonic acid in 6 ml of freshly distilled dry pyridine, 3 g (0.026 mole) of racemic α-phenylethylamine is added dropwise with shaking. The mixture is heated in an oil bath at 120–130° for 2 h. After cooling, the pyridine is distilled off in vacuo. The oily residue is treated with dry acetone; a white crystalline precipitate of β-N-phenylethylaminobutyric acid separates. Yield 3.4 g (65.4%); mp 189–190° (from acetone); \(R_f\) 0.69 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1).

Found, %: C 69.15, 69.24; H 8.50, 8.59
Calculated, %: C 69.56; H 8.21

Racemic β-aminobutyric acid (IV). 0.5 g (0.002 mole) of III is dissolved in 10 ml of 30% ethyl alcohol. The mixture is hydrogenated over palladium black in a stream of hydrogen at 40° for 20 h. The catalyst is filtered off; the alcoholic solution of β-aminobutyric acid is evaporated to a volume of 1 ml. The acid is precipitated with acetone. Yield 0.2 g (100% based on III); mp 191–193° (2) (precipitated from 96% alcoholic solution with acetone); \(R_f\) 0.21 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1).

Found, %: C 46.17, 46.32; H 8.85, 8.82
Calculated, %: C 46.60; H 8.74

(+) 3σ- and (−) 3ρ-N-phenylethylaminobutyric acids from α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20} -41^\circ\). To a solution of 2.2 g (0.026 mole) of crotonic acid in 6 ml of dry, freshly distilled pyridine, 3 g (0.026 mole) of α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20} -41^\circ\) is added dropwise with shaking. The reaction mixture is heated for 2 h in an oil bath at a temperature of 120–130°. The pyridine is distilled off in vacuo and freshly distilled acetone (~20 ml) is added to the residue. A white crystalline…

crystalline precipitate (IIIa). Yield 1.4 g (27%); mp 187–188°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +21.99° (\(C = 1.4\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −32.1° (\(C = 0.9\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −6.66° (\(C = 1.2\); 2 N HCl); \(R_f\) 0.69 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1). Ether is added to the acetone mother liquor; a white, oily substance (IIIb) precipitates, crystallizing upon trituration with absolute ether. Yield of IIIb—2 g (38.5%); mp 150–151°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −44.82° (\(C = 1.5\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −71.08° (\(C = 1.4\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −28.19° (\(C = 1.4\); 2 N HCl).

(+)3σ- and (−)3ρ-Aminobutyric acids from α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −41°. A solution of 0.5 g (0.002 mole) of the N-substituted acid with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +21.99° (IIIa) in 10 ml of 30% ethyl alcohol is hydrogenated over palladium black in a stream of hydrogen for 24 h. After separation of the catalyst, the solution is evaporated to a volume of 1 ml. The acid is precipitated with acetone. Yield 0.22 g (100% based on IIIa); mp 215–218°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +35.69° (\(C = 2\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +12.65° (\(C = 0.9\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +16.26° (\(C = 1.2\); 2 N HCl); \(R_f\) 0.21 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1). Upon hydrogenation of 0.5 g (0.002 mole) of the N-substituted acid with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −44.82° (IIIb) under the same conditions, 0.22 g of β-aminobutyric acid is obtained, mp 215–216°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −33.94° (\(C = 1\); H\(_2\)O) (4); \(R_f\) 0.21 (in the same system).

(−)3ρ- and (+)3σ-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acids from α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +41°. From 2.2 g (0.026 mole) of crotonic acid in 6 ml of freshly distilled dry pyridine and 3 g (0.026 mole) of α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +41°, 1.5 g (28.8%) of IIIc is obtained (from acetone); mp 187–189°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −18.29° (\(C = 1.4\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +32.45° (\(C = 1.8\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +4.5° (\(C = 1.5\); 2 N HCl); \(R_f\) 0.69 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1).

After addition of ether to the acetone solution, an oily substance (IIId) precipitates, which is treated by the method described above. Yield 2.2 g (IIId; 42.3%); mp 145–147°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +30.69° (\(C = 1.5\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +53.43° (\(C = 1.4\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +18.96° (\(C = 1.4\); 2 N HCl); \(R_f\) 0.69 (in the same system).

(−)3ρ- and (+)3σ-Aminobutyric acids. Hydrogenation of 0.5 g (0.002 mole) of the N-substituted β-aminobutyric acid IIIc \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −18.29° in 10 ml of 30% ethyl alcohol over palladium black in a stream of hydrogen under the conditions described above leads to β-aminobutyric acid with mp 215–216° (4); \([\alpha]_D^{21}\) −34.91° (\(C = 2.2\); H\(_2\)O) (4); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −12.66° (\(C = 1.2\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −18.5° (\(C = 1.2\); 2 N HCl) \(R_f\) 0.21 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1).

Upon hydrogenation of 0.5 g (0.002 mole) of the N-substituted β-aminobutyric acid (IIId) with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +30.69°, β-aminobutyric acid is obtained, mp 215–217°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +31.25° (\(C = 0.9\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +11.02° (\(C = 0.8\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +14.4° (\(C = 0.9\); 2 N HCl); \(R_f\) 0.21 (in the same system).

Moscow State University
named after M. V. Lomonosov

Received
19 I 1965

CITED LITERATURE

  1. T. Curtius, J. prakt. Chem., (2) 70, 204 (1964); R. Engel, Bull. Soc. chim. France, 50, 102 (1888).
  2. A. Zilkha, J. Rivlin, J. Org. Chem., 23, 95 (1958).
  3. B. M. Rodionov, N. G. Yartseva, Izv. AN SSSR, ser. khim., No. 1, 103 (1952).
  4. E. Fischer, H. Scheibler, Ann., 383, 348, 365 (1911).
  5. M. Hunt, V. du Vigneaud, J. Biol. Chem., 127, 730 (1939).
  6. K. Balenović, D. Cerar, Z. Fuks, J. Chem. Soc., 1952, 3316.
  7. K. Balenović, N. Bregant, D. Cerar, J. Chem. Soc., 1956, 3982.
  8. A. P. Terent’ev, A. N. Kost, et al., Nomenclature of Organic Compounds, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1955, p. 233.

Submission history

Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR A. P. Terent’ev, R. A. Gracheva,