Full Text
CHEMISTRY
Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR A. P. Terent’ev, R. A. Gracheva,
T. F. Dedenko
SYNTHESIS OF OPTICAL ISOMERS OF β-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID
Racemic β-aminobutyric acid is usually obtained by addition of ammonia to crotonic acid \((^1)\). Addition of benzylamine \((^2)\) to crotonic acid with subsequent hydrogenolysis of the N-substituted acid also leads to an optically inactive acid. At present, for the synthesis of β-amino acids, including β-aminobutyric acid, a method is widely used that consists in the interaction of aldehydes, malonic acid, and ammonia \((^3)\).
In optically active form, β-aminobutyric acid was first obtained by Fischer \((^4)\) by resolution of the racemate with camphorsulfonic acid. Racemic β-aminobutyric acid was obtained by him by hydrogenation of the phenylhydrazone of acetoacetic ester. Later \((^5)\), β-aminobutyric acid was resolved with the aid of optically active α-phenylethylamine. In 1952 Balenovich and co-workers \((^6)\) synthesized optically active \((+)\)-β-aminobutyric acid, applying the Arndt—Eistert reaction to \((-)\)-1-diazo-3-phthalimidobutan-2-one, obtained from \(L\)-alanine. The specific rotation of β-aminobutyric acid was \(+38.80^\circ\). Somewhat later the configuration of β-aminobutyric acid was established. \((+)\)-β-Aminobutyric and \(L\)-α-aminobutyric acids were converted to 2-phthalimidobutane, and, by analogy with α-amino acids, β-aminobutyric acid was assigned to the \(L\)-series \((^7)\).
\[ \begin{array}{ccc} \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CH_2COOH}\\ |\\ \mathrm{H_2N{-}C{-}H}\\ |\\ \mathrm{CH_3} \end{array} & \longrightarrow & \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CH_2CH_3}\\ |\\ \mathrm{C_6H_4(CO)_2N{-}C{-}H}\\ |\\ \mathrm{CH_3} \end{array} \longleftarrow \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{COOH}\\ |\\ \mathrm{H_2N{-}C{-}H}\\ |\\ \mathrm{CH_2CH_3} \end{array} \\[1em] (+)\ \text{3s-aminobutyric acid} && (-)\ \text{2s-aminobutyric acid} \end{array} \]
In the present work we propose a new method for the synthesis of both antipodes of β-aminobutyric acid, starting from crotonic acid and optically active α-phenylethylamine.
\[ \mathrm{CH_3CH{=}CHCOOH} + \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{C_6H_5\overset{*}{CH}CH_3}\\ |\\ \mathrm{NH_2} \end{array} \rightarrow \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CH_3\overset{*}{CH}CH_2COOH}\\ |\\ \mathrm{NH\overset{*}{CH}CH_3}\\ |\\ \mathrm{C_6H_5} \end{array} \rightarrow \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CH_3\overset{*}{CH}CH_2COOH}\\ |\\ \mathrm{NH_2} \end{array} \]
\[ \begin{array}{cccc} \text{(I)} & \text{(II)} & \text{(IIIa, IIIb, IIIc, IIId)} & \text{(IV)} \end{array} \]
When one of the antipodes of α-phenylethylamine is added to crotonic acid, two diastereomeric forms of N-substituted β-aminobutyric acid are formed. We separated the diastereomers IIIa and IIIb, using the greater solubility of one of them in acetone. When using α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20} -41^\circ\), we isolated the N-substituted β-aminobutyric acids IIIa with \([\alpha]_D^{20} +21.99^\circ\) (yield 27%) and IIIb with \([\alpha]_D^{20} -44.82^\circ\) (yield 38.5%).
By hydrogenolysis of the N-substituted acids, \((+)\)-β-aminobutyric acid with \([\alpha]_D^{20} +35.69^\circ\) (92% optical purity) and \((-)\)-β-aminobutyric acid with \([\alpha]_D^{20} -33.91^\circ\) (87.4% optical purity) were obtained. In the case of addition
to crotonic acid, $\alpha$-phenylethylamine with $[\alpha]_D^{20} +41^\circ$ gave N-substituted $\beta$-aminobutyric acids—IIIc with $[\alpha]_D^{20} -18.29^\circ$ (yield 28.8%) and IIIa with $[\alpha]_D^{20} +30.69^\circ$ (yield 42.3%). Hydrolysis of the N-substituted acids IIIc and IIIa led to $\beta$-aminobutyric acids with $[\alpha]_D^{20} -34.91^\circ$ (90% optical purity) and with $[\alpha]_D^{20} +31.25^\circ$ (81% optical purity). The total yield of the N-substituted $\beta$-aminobutyric acids IIIa and IIIb (IIIc and IIId) in both cases is $\sim 70\%$.
Table 1
Experimental data*
| Name of acid | Yield, % | M.p., °C | (Butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1) | $[\alpha]_D^{20}$, H₂O | $[\alpha]_D^{20}$, 2 N NaOH | $[\alpha]_D^{20}$, 2 N HCl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−) $\alpha$-Phenylethylamine | ||||||
| (+) 3$\sigma$-(N-Phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid | 27 | 187–8 | 0.69 | +21.99°; C = 1.4 | −32.1°; C = 0.9 | −6.66°; C = 1.2 |
| (−) 3$\beta$-(N-Phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid | 38.5 | 150–151 | 0.69 | −44.82°; C = 1.5 | −71.08°; C = 1.4 | −28.19°; C = 1.4 |
| (+) 3$\sigma$-Aminobutyric acid | quant. | 215–216 | 0.21 | +35.69°; C = 2; $t = 21^\circ$ | +12.65°; C = 0.9 | +16.26°; C = 1 |
| (−) 3$\beta$-Aminobutyric acid | quant. | 216 | 0.21 | −33.91°; C = 1 | — | — |
| (+) $\alpha$-Phenylethylamine | ||||||
| (−) 3$\beta$-(N-Phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid | 28.8 | 187–9 | 0.69 | −18.29°; C = 1.4 | +32.45°; C = 1.8 | +4.5°; C = 1.5 |
| (+) 3$\sigma$-(N-Phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid | 42.3 | 145–7 | 0.69 | +30.69°; C = 1.5 | +53.43°; C = 1.4 | +18.95°; C = 1.4 |
| (−) 3$\beta$-Aminobutyric acid | quant. | 215–6 | 0.21 | −34.91°; C = 2.2; $t = 21^\circ$ | −12.66°; C = 1.2 | −18.5°; C = 1.2 |
| (+) 3$\sigma$-Aminobutyric acid | quant. | 215–7 | 0.21 | +31.25°; C = 0.9 | +11.02°; C = 0.8 | +14.4°; C = 0.9 |
* Literature data: (+) $\beta$-aminobutyric acid—m.p. 200°; $[\alpha]_D^{20} +35.3^\circ$ (C = 9.6; H₂O); $[\alpha]_D^{20} +14.7^\circ$ (C = 9.8; 1 N NaOH) (4); $[\alpha]_D^{20} +29.7^\circ$ (C = 10; 1 N HCl); $[\alpha]_D^{18} +38.8^\circ$ (C = 0.5; H₂O) (6); (−) $\beta$-aminobutyric acid—m.p. 220°; $[\alpha]_D^{20} -35.2^\circ$ (C = 10; H₂O) (4).
By the method proposed by us, one of the diastereomers is isolated in the predominant amount ($\sim$ by 14%). In order to decide the question of asymmetric induction in this reaction, we carried out hydrolysis of the mixture of diastereomers IIIa and IIIb (without separation) from $\alpha$-phenylethylamine
Table 2
Molecular rotations of $\beta$-aminobutyric acids from (+) $\alpha$-phenylethylamine*
| Wavelength | (+) 3$\sigma$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, H₂O | (+) 3$\sigma$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, 2 N NaOH | (+) 3$\sigma$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, 2 N HCl | (−) 3$\beta$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, H₂O | (−) 3$\beta$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, 2 N NaOH | (−) 3$\beta$-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acid, 2 N HCl | (−) 3$\beta$-Aminobutyric acid, H₂O | (−) 3$\beta$-Aminobutyric acid, 2 N NaOH | (−) 3$\beta$-Aminobutyric acid, 2 N HCl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 589 | +60.07° | +110.54° | +39.23° | −28.98° | +57.28° | +9.18° | −35.14° | −12.63° | −19.15° |
| 578 | +69.16° | +125.44° | +42.02° | −36.63° | +72.04° | +12.01° | −40.17° | −14.25° | −21.83° |
| 546 | +70.38° | +141.79° | +49.06° | −47.15° | +85.49° | +12.71° | −46.04° | −17.13° | −24.77° |
| 436 | +114.88° | +249.6° | +80.04° | −52.39° | +135.99° | +27.32° | −71.89° | −20.35° | −28.58° |
| 405 | +137.03° | +304.91° | +99.36° | −57.63° | +164.33° | +34.36° | −85.34° | −25.20° | −35.20° |
| 382 | — | — | — | −83.64° | +216.11° | +38.71° | −93.93° | −32.75° | −37.09° |
| 365 | +469.68° | +840.83° | +252.23° | −95.5° | — | — | −109.3° | −34.49° | −45.02° |
| 356 | — | — | — | −105.42° | — | — | −115.26° | — | −46.33° |
| 334 | +600.09° | +1074.3° | +230.69° | — | — | — | −145.55° | — | −53.37° |
| 313 | +704.63° | +1357.9° | +392.26° | — | — | — | −169.3° | — | −57.17° |
| 302 | +783.87° | +1548.36° | +432.60° | — | — | — | −173.89° | — | −56.67° |
| 297 | +838.97° | +1643.2° | +453.33° | — | — | — | −175° | — | −58.60° |
* Values of the molecular rotations are given for only one antipode of $\beta$-aminobutyric acid.
with $[\alpha]_D^{20} -41^\circ$. After removal of the impurity of optically active $\alpha$-phenylethylamine, the rotation of the acidic solution of $\beta$-aminobutyric acid was measured. At the sodium D-line it proved to be $-4^\circ$. Thus, both experiments on the separation of diastereomers and experiments without separation indicate
for the fact that, on addition of optically active α-phenylethylamine to crotonic acid, asymmetric induction is observed.
For conclusions about the regularities of this reaction, further accumulation of experimental material is necessary.
For β-aminobutyric and N-substituted β-aminobutyric acids we have, for the first time, recorded optical rotatory dispersion curves. In Fig. 1 are shown the ORD curves of acids obtained using (−)-α-phenylethylamine; Table 2 gives the values of molecular rotations for β-aminobutyric acids isolated using (+)-α-phenylethylamine. To designate the configurations of optically active β-aminobutyric acids we used the ρ—σ system proposed by Terent’ev and co-workers (8).
Fig. 1. 1 — 3σ-aminobutyric acid in 2 N NaOH; 2 — (+)3σ-aminobutyric acid in 2 N HCl; 3 — (+)3σ-aminobutyric acid in H₂O; 4 — (+)3σ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in H₂O; 5 — (+)3σ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in 2 N HCl; 6 — (+)3σ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in 2 N NaOH; 7 — (−)3ρ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in H₂O; 8 — (−)3ρ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in 2 N NaOH; 9 — (−)3ρ-(N-phenylethyl)-aminobutyric acid in 2 N HCl.
Experimental Part
Racemic β-N-phenylethylaminobutyric acid (III). To a solution of 2.2 g (0.026 mole) of crotonic acid in 6 ml of freshly distilled dry pyridine, 3 g (0.026 mole) of racemic α-phenylethylamine is added dropwise with shaking. The mixture is heated in an oil bath at 120–130° for 2 h. After cooling, the pyridine is distilled off in vacuo. The oily residue is treated with dry acetone; a white crystalline precipitate of β-N-phenylethylaminobutyric acid separates. Yield 3.4 g (65.4%); mp 189–190° (from acetone); \(R_f\) 0.69 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1).
Found, %: C 69.15, 69.24; H 8.50, 8.59
Calculated, %: C 69.56; H 8.21
Racemic β-aminobutyric acid (IV). 0.5 g (0.002 mole) of III is dissolved in 10 ml of 30% ethyl alcohol. The mixture is hydrogenated over palladium black in a stream of hydrogen at 40° for 20 h. The catalyst is filtered off; the alcoholic solution of β-aminobutyric acid is evaporated to a volume of 1 ml. The acid is precipitated with acetone. Yield 0.2 g (100% based on III); mp 191–193° (2) (precipitated from 96% alcoholic solution with acetone); \(R_f\) 0.21 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1).
Found, %: C 46.17, 46.32; H 8.85, 8.82
Calculated, %: C 46.60; H 8.74
(+) 3σ- and (−) 3ρ-N-phenylethylaminobutyric acids from α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20} -41^\circ\). To a solution of 2.2 g (0.026 mole) of crotonic acid in 6 ml of dry, freshly distilled pyridine, 3 g (0.026 mole) of α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20} -41^\circ\) is added dropwise with shaking. The reaction mixture is heated for 2 h in an oil bath at a temperature of 120–130°. The pyridine is distilled off in vacuo and freshly distilled acetone (~20 ml) is added to the residue. A white crystalline…
crystalline precipitate (IIIa). Yield 1.4 g (27%); mp 187–188°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +21.99° (\(C = 1.4\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −32.1° (\(C = 0.9\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −6.66° (\(C = 1.2\); 2 N HCl); \(R_f\) 0.69 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1). Ether is added to the acetone mother liquor; a white, oily substance (IIIb) precipitates, crystallizing upon trituration with absolute ether. Yield of IIIb—2 g (38.5%); mp 150–151°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −44.82° (\(C = 1.5\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −71.08° (\(C = 1.4\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −28.19° (\(C = 1.4\); 2 N HCl).
(+)3σ- and (−)3ρ-Aminobutyric acids from α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −41°. A solution of 0.5 g (0.002 mole) of the N-substituted acid with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +21.99° (IIIa) in 10 ml of 30% ethyl alcohol is hydrogenated over palladium black in a stream of hydrogen for 24 h. After separation of the catalyst, the solution is evaporated to a volume of 1 ml. The acid is precipitated with acetone. Yield 0.22 g (100% based on IIIa); mp 215–218°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +35.69° (\(C = 2\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +12.65° (\(C = 0.9\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +16.26° (\(C = 1.2\); 2 N HCl); \(R_f\) 0.21 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1). Upon hydrogenation of 0.5 g (0.002 mole) of the N-substituted acid with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −44.82° (IIIb) under the same conditions, 0.22 g of β-aminobutyric acid is obtained, mp 215–216°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −33.94° (\(C = 1\); H\(_2\)O) (4); \(R_f\) 0.21 (in the same system).
(−)3ρ- and (+)3σ-N-Phenylethylaminobutyric acids from α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +41°. From 2.2 g (0.026 mole) of crotonic acid in 6 ml of freshly distilled dry pyridine and 3 g (0.026 mole) of α-phenylethylamine with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +41°, 1.5 g (28.8%) of IIIc is obtained (from acetone); mp 187–189°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −18.29° (\(C = 1.4\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +32.45° (\(C = 1.8\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +4.5° (\(C = 1.5\); 2 N HCl); \(R_f\) 0.69 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1).
After addition of ether to the acetone solution, an oily substance (IIId) precipitates, which is treated by the method described above. Yield 2.2 g (IIId; 42.3%); mp 145–147°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +30.69° (\(C = 1.5\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +53.43° (\(C = 1.4\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +18.96° (\(C = 1.4\); 2 N HCl); \(R_f\) 0.69 (in the same system).
(−)3ρ- and (+)3σ-Aminobutyric acids. Hydrogenation of 0.5 g (0.002 mole) of the N-substituted β-aminobutyric acid IIIc \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −18.29° in 10 ml of 30% ethyl alcohol over palladium black in a stream of hydrogen under the conditions described above leads to β-aminobutyric acid with mp 215–216° (4); \([\alpha]_D^{21}\) −34.91° (\(C = 2.2\); H\(_2\)O) (4); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −12.66° (\(C = 1.2\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) −18.5° (\(C = 1.2\); 2 N HCl) \(R_f\) 0.21 (butanol : water : acetic acid = 4 : 5 : 1).
Upon hydrogenation of 0.5 g (0.002 mole) of the N-substituted β-aminobutyric acid (IIId) with \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +30.69°, β-aminobutyric acid is obtained, mp 215–217°; \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +31.25° (\(C = 0.9\); H\(_2\)O); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +11.02° (\(C = 0.8\); 2 N NaOH); \([\alpha]_D^{20}\) +14.4° (\(C = 0.9\); 2 N HCl); \(R_f\) 0.21 (in the same system).
Moscow State University
named after M. V. Lomonosov
Received
19 I 1965
CITED LITERATURE
- T. Curtius, J. prakt. Chem., (2) 70, 204 (1964); R. Engel, Bull. Soc. chim. France, 50, 102 (1888).
- A. Zilkha, J. Rivlin, J. Org. Chem., 23, 95 (1958).
- B. M. Rodionov, N. G. Yartseva, Izv. AN SSSR, ser. khim., No. 1, 103 (1952).
- E. Fischer, H. Scheibler, Ann., 383, 348, 365 (1911).
- M. Hunt, V. du Vigneaud, J. Biol. Chem., 127, 730 (1939).
- K. Balenović, D. Cerar, Z. Fuks, J. Chem. Soc., 1952, 3316.
- K. Balenović, N. Bregant, D. Cerar, J. Chem. Soc., 1956, 3982.
- A. P. Terent’ev, A. N. Kost, et al., Nomenclature of Organic Compounds, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1955, p. 233.