In my note (S. R. Kogalovskii, “On the relationship between finitely projective and finitely reduction classes of models”), published in *Doklady Akademii Nauk*, vol. 155, no. 6, 1964, Theorem 3 is incorrect and should be replaced by the following theorem, which is easily proved with the aid of the Craig–Vaught theorem on recursively axiomatizable classes of infinite models:
Full Text
Corrigendum
In my note (S. R. Kogalovskii, “On the relationship between finitely projective and finitely reduction classes of models”), published in Doklady Akademii Nauk, vol. 155, no. 6, 1964, Theorem 3 is incorrect and should be replaced by the following theorem, which is easily proved with the aid of the Craig–Vaught theorem on recursively axiomatizable classes of infinite models:
Theorem 3. For every recursively enumerable set \(J\) there exists a recursively axiomatizable, and hence finitely reduction, class of models whose finite spectrum is a complement of \(J\).
It is easy to see that Theorem 4, which is the principal result of the note, follows directly from the last theorem and Theorem 2.
S. Kogalovskii
Submission history
[v1] 1965-01-01