UDC 535.333
PHYSICS
Submitted 1966-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196601.45404 | Translated from Russian

Full Text

UDC 535.333

PHYSICS

Academician of the Academy of Sciences of the BSSR A. N. SEVCHENKO, K. N. SOLOV'EV,
A. T. GRADYUSHKO, S. F. SHKIRMAN

QUASILINEAR ELECTRONIC SPECTRA OF METAL DERIVATIVES OF TETRABENZOPORPHIN AND PHTHALOCYANINE

Metalloporphyrins, i.e., complex compounds of porphyrin derivatives with metals, deserve careful study as analogues of compounds of major importance for biology—chlorophyll, heme, cytochromes, and others. A spectroscopic study of chlorophyll-like molecules should provide valuable information on the electronic structure of the chlorophyll molecule, which is essential for understanding the process of photosynthesis.

The introduction of a metal atom into the center of the porphyrin ring and related structures is accompanied by sharp changes in the electronic absorption spectra and by less significant changes in the fluorescence spectra, which at room temperature remain two-banded and approximately mirror-symmetric to the two longest-wavelength absorption bands (see the review (^1)). These phenomena are due, in general terms, to an increase in molecular symmetry from \(D_{2h}\) to \(D_{4h}\) upon introduction of the metal and to the influence of the nature of the metal on the intensity of the \(0\)—\(0\) band.

Until recently, the fine structure of the electron-vibrational spectra of porphyrins had not been studied. The use of E. V. Shpol'skii’s method of quasilinear spectra made it possible to solve this problem for a number of metal-free porphyrin derivatives (^2–^6). However, for the only metalloporphyrin investigated—Mg-phthalocyanine—the quasilinear spectrum obtained was considerably less sharp than that of metal-free phthalocyanine (^2). This circumstance, together with the complex character of the main “multiplet,” hindered interpretation of the spectrum.

For the magnesium and zinc complexes of tetrabenzoporphin (TBP) and tetrabenzo-tetraazaporphin (phthalocyanine, Pc), we have succeeded in finding conditions under which the quasilinear spectra are sufficiently sharp and the main multiplet sufficiently simple to permit a vibrational analysis of the fluorescence and absorption spectra. The work of selecting conditions for obtaining quasilinear spectra of metalloporphyrins is extremely laborious and, unfortunately, largely empirical. As in the case of the previously studied metal-free compounds (^4–^6), we used the method of dissolving additives to introduce the substance into a hydrocarbon matrix (\(n\)-octane). It turned out that the best additional solvent for the magnesium complexes studied is absolute ethanol, and for the zinc complexes, a pyridine–acetone mixture. A small addition of solution was introduced into octane immediately before freezing (the experimental temperature was \(77^\circ\) K). The spectra were recorded on an ISP-51 spectrograph with a UF-84 camera (\(F = 800\) mm) using Infra-720 photographic plates (for TBP) and Infra-760 (for Pc). The compounds studied were prepared and purified by T. F. Kachura: Mg-TBP according to (^7, ^8) with subsequent chromatography on \(\mathrm{Al_2O_3}\) using an acetone–trichloroethylene mixture as developer; Mg-Pc according to (^9); and the zinc complexes from spectrally pure TBP (^5) and commercial phthalocyanine by reaction with zinc acetate in boiling pyridine.

As already mentioned, the fluorescence spectra of metalloporphyrins at room temperature consist, as a rule, of two bands with frequency-

with an interval of about 1500 cm\(^{-1}\). Between them there is sometimes observed a less intense band, which is especially pronounced in metallophthalocyanines. The spectra of the compounds studied (Fig. 1) differ by an increased intensity of the 0—0 band, due to the removal of the quasi-forbiddenness of the long-wavelength electronic transition as a result of benzo- and aza-substitution. The absorption spectra are approximately mirror-symmetric to the fluorescence spectra, in accordance with Levshin’s law of mirror symmetry of absorption and emission spectra, but the frequency interval between the absorption bands in the TBP complexes is smaller than in the fluorescence spectra, while in the PC complexes it is somewhat larger.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Absorption and fluorescence spectra of Mg-phthalocyanine (solid curves) and Zn-tetrabenzoporphin (dashed curves) at room temperature

In frozen octane solutions, the spectra described split into a series of quasilines; moreover, the first band corresponds to an intense principal multiplet and a group of weak vibrational satellites with small frequencies (which justifies the name 0—0 band), while the second and intermediate bands correspond to groups of lines, indicating the complex character of these bands (see Fig. 2). Under the conditions we selected, only two components of the principal multiplet possess appreciable intensity, one of them being much more intense than the other, so that the quasilinear spectrum appears as consisting of singlets (except for Mg-TBP). The absorption spectra begin with a principal “multiplet,” resonantly coinciding with the principal “multiplet” of fluorescence, and likewise consist practically of singlets, with the exception of Zn-TBP, where the absorption spectrum has a “doublet” structure. The reason for the latter is unclear; it may be connected with the presence of two forms differently solvated by the solvent additives—pyridine and acetone.

On the basis of the data obtained, a vibrational analysis was carried out and the frequencies of the normal vibrations active in the electronic spectra of the compounds studied were determined. The results of the analysis of the fluorescence spectra, i.e., the frequencies of the ground state, are summarized in Table 1, where data are also presented for metal-free TBP \((^5)\) and PC \((^3)\).

Comparison of the spectra of the metal derivatives with the spectra of the free bases makes it possible to draw a number of conclusions. First, the general character of the vibrational structure changes little upon introduction of the metal: the frequencies change only slightly, by no more than 50 cm\(^{-1}\); the same normal vibrations are the most active in the spectrum. However, for some vibrations the activity changes appreciably upon introduction of the metal. Secondly, it is possible to correlate the majority of frequencies in both types of compounds—TBP and PC—with the exception of the most active frequencies in the interval 1500–1600 cm\(^{-1}\). Thirdly, the changes of the corresponding vibrations in the series free base—magnesium—zinc are analogous for TBP and PC, which confirms the kinship of the indicated vibrations and points to a similar influence of the metal atom on the dynamics of the molecule in both cases. Fourthly, most vibrations can be assigned to two types: the first type is characterized by an increase in frequency upon introduction of magnesium, the second by a decrease in frequency upon introduction of magnesium; in both cases, on going from magnesium to zinc the frequencies increase. The first type includes, mainly, low frequencies, and the second includes frequencies above 1000 cm\(^{-1}\). It may be supposed

Quasi-line fluorescence spectra

Fig. 2. Quasi-line fluorescence spectra at 77° K in n-octane:
a — Mg-phthalocyanine, b — Zn-phthalocyanine, c — Mg-tetrabenzoporphin, d — Zn-tetrabenzoporphin.

Table 1*

TBP \((^5)\), \(\nu,\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) TBP, int. Mg-TBP, \(\nu,\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) Mg-TBP, int. Zn-TBP, \(\nu,\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) Zn-TBP, int. Mg-PC, \(\nu,\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) Mg-PC, int. Zn-PC, \(\nu,\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) Zn-PC, int. PC \((^8)\), \(\nu,\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) PC, int.
118 med. 130 very weak 137 very weak 138 very weak 148 very weak 139 med.
127 med. 160 extr. weak 153 very weak 182 weak 173 extr. weak 184 weak
218 int. 238 very weak 244 very weak 244 very weak 270 very weak 235 weak
351 extr. weak 366 extr. weak 354 extr. weak 344 extr. weak
480 extr. weak 485 weak 486 weak 485 med. 484 med. 488 weak
510 extr. weak 519 extr. weak 512 extr. weak 561 extr. weak 546 weak
566 extr. weak 586 extr. weak 588 weak 590 med. 572 med.
629 extr. weak 643 very weak 611 extr. weak 611 extr. weak
698 int. 701 med. 703 med. 683 int. 682 int. 684 int.
723 med. 738 med. 740 med. 748 int. 749 int. 726 int.
801 med. 829 med. 827 weak 830 med. 834 weak 801 int.
950 weak 949 weak 1009 weak
1018 extr. weak 1011 extr. weak 1025 extr. weak 1011 extr. weak 1018 extr. weak 1028 very weak
1045 extr. weak 1068 extr. weak 1066 extr. weak 1113 very weak 1107 very weak 1085 weak
1125 extr. weak 1124 extr. weak 1123 very weak 1144 med. 1144 med. 1143 int.
1156 extr. weak 1154 extr. weak 1159 weak
1223 med. 1205 extr. weak 1188 weak 1181 very weak 1188 med.
1250 med. 1245 med. 1253 med. 1222 weak 1225 weak 1233 very weak
1308 very weak 1308 very weak 1318 weak
1331 med. 1331 med. 1335 int. 1347 med. 1346 int. 1348 int.
1418 extr. weak 1424 extr. weak 1433 extr. weak 1404 weak
1451 extr. weak 1444 very weak 1456 weak 1444 extr. weak 1455 extr. weak 1455 med.
1513 int. 1514 int. 1517 med.
1526 extr. weak 1530 extr. weak 1531 very weak 1562 very weak
1596 int. 1556 int. 1570 med. 1582 int. 1540 med. 1555 int.
1624 int. 1612 int. 1624 int.
\(1651=1513+138\) weak

* Conventional designations: TBP—tetrabenzoporphin, PC—phthalocyanine; int.—intense, med.—medium intensity, weak—weak, very weak—very weak, extr. weak—extremely weak (estimate of the intensities of the corresponding quasilines).

It may be assumed that the first type is due to stabilization of the macrocycle upon introduction of a metal as a result of the conjugation effect, which increases in connection with the rise in symmetry from \(D_{2h}\) to \(D_{4h}\), while the second type is due to the superposition on this effect of a stronger effect associated with the disappearance of the repulsion of the two central hydrogen atoms upon introduction of the me-

Table 2

Mg-TBP, \(\nu,\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) Mg-TBP, int. Zn-TBP, \(\nu,\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) Zn-TBP, int. Mg-PC, \(\nu,\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) Mg-PC, int. Zn-PC, \(\nu,\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) Zn-PC, int.
133 very weak 138 extr. weak 123 very weak
160 extr. weak 177 med. 170
220 very weak 240 very weak 243 very weak 268 very weak
362 extr. weak
483 very weak 479 weak 481 med. 483 weak
540 extr. weak
584 extr. weak 584 weak 580 med.
643 very weak 607 weak
697 med. 694 int. 679 int. 676 int.
740 very weak 723 weak 747 int. 740 med.
817 med. 820 med. 805 med. 840 med.
939 med. 942 weak
1006 very weak 1011 extr. weak
1020 extr. weak 1025 weak 1088 extr. weak
1094 very weak 1078 med. 1132 med. 1130 med.
1116 very weak 1090 med.
1174 very weak 1180 weak
1222 very weak 1251 int. 1225 med. 1246 weak
1295 extr. weak 1290 weak
1327 int. 1335 int. 1346 int. 1336 med.
1407 weak
1437 very weak 1422 weak 1443 very weak
1497 very weak 1495 very weak
1514 med. 1505 int.
1550 weak 1565 med.
1605 weak 1595 weak
\(1628=1497+138\) int. \(1610=1495+123\) med.
\(1672=1497+177\) med. \(1667=1495+170\) int.
\(1710=1495+225\) med.
\(1763=1495+268\) weak

...of the metal. The increase in frequencies on going from magnesium to zinc indicates the stabilizing influence of the stronger complex-forming agent.

In the first excited state, as the analysis of the absorption spectra shows, the frequencies of the normal vibrations have values close to the frequencies of the ground state (see Table 2), with some frequencies being retained to an accuracy of \(2\text{–}3\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\), i.e., within the experimental error, while others change (as a rule, decrease) more noticeably upon electronic excitation. The intensities of the transitions change more sharply.

Our data make it possible to determine the nature of the deviations from mirror symmetry in the spectra of the compounds studied. Although at room temperature the symmetry of the frequencies is violated while the symmetry of the band intensities is satisfactory \((^1)\), the low-temperature quasilinear spectra show that deviations from mirror symmetry are caused not by changes in the vibrational frequencies upon electronic excitation, but by differences in the probabilities of the corresponding vibronic transitions. In the absorption of TBP metal derivatives, transitions with vibrations in the range \(1000\text{–}1400\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) are relatively more intense, whereas in the fluorescence spectrum the most active vibrations are those near \(1600\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\), which leads to a decrease in the frequency interval between the bands of the absorption spectrum at room temperature. In the absorption spectra of PC metal derivatives, the combination frequencies corresponding to excitation together with the most active vibration near \(1500\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) of small vibrational quanta \((100\text{–}300\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1})\) are more intense than in the fluorescence spectra; as a result, the frequency interval between the absorption bands at room temperature is larger than between the fluorescence bands.

Since the lower excited state of metalloporphyrin molecules is doubly degenerate \((^1)\), in the low-temperature spectra one might have expected the manifestation of the Jahn–Teller effect, i.e., splitting of the degenerate level as a consequence of the interaction of electronic and vibrational motions. We believe, however, that the doublet structure observed in the quasilinear spectra of the compounds studied is not due to the Jahn–Teller effect, since an analogous doublet structure is observed for the less symmetric free bases, where there is no degeneracy. Therefore, the increased width of the quasilines, as compared with metal-free porphyrins, should be associated with this effect; i.e., in the present case the Jahn–Teller splitting does not exceed several reciprocal centimeters.

In conclusion, the authors express their gratitude to T. F. Kachura for preparing the compounds studied.

Institute of Physics
Academy of Sciences of the BSSR

Received
24 II 1966

CITED LITERATURE

  1. G. P. Gurinovich, A. N. Sevchenko, K. N. Solov’ev, UFN, 79, 173 (1963).
  2. F. F. Litvin, R. I. Personov, DAN, 136, 798 (1961).
  3. R. I. Personov, Optics and Spectroscopy, 15, 61 (1963).
  4. A. N. Sevchenko, K. N. Solov’ev et al., DAN, 153, 1391 (1963).
  5. A. N. Sevchenko, K. N. Solov’ev et al., DAN, 161, 1313 (1965).
  6. S. F. Shkirman, K. N. Solov’ev, Izv. AN SSSR, ser. fiz., 29, 1378 (1965).
  7. P. A. Barrett, R. P. Linstead et al., J. Chem. Soc., 1940, 1079.
  8. K. N. Solov’ev, S. F. Shkirman, T. F. Kachura, Izv. AN SSSR, ser. fiz., 27, 767 (1963).
  9. G. T. Byrne, R. P. Linstead, A. R. Lowe, J. Chem. Soc., 1934, 1017.

Submission history

UDC 535.333