Full Text
UDC 517.941
MATHEMATICS
G. S. ZAĬTSEVA
ON A MULTIPOINT BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEM
(Presented by Academician A. Yu. Ishlinskii, 13 XII 1966)
Consider the equation
\[ x^{(n)}+p_1(t)x^{(n-1)}+\cdots+p_n(t)x=0 \qquad (a\le t\le b), \tag{1} \]
where \(p_1(t),\ldots,p_n(t)\) are real continuous functions on the interval \([a,b]\),
\[ |p_i(t)|\le L_i,\qquad i=1,2,\ldots,n \qquad (a\le t\le b), \]
and the multipoint boundary-value problem
\[ x(a_i)=A_{i,1},\quad x'(a_i)=A_{i,2},\ldots,x^{(r_i-1)}(a_i)=A_{i,r_i}, \]
\[ i=1,2,\ldots,m\quad (2\le m\le n,\ r_1+r_2+\cdots+r_m=n), \tag{2} \]
\[ a\le a_1<a_2<\cdots<a_m\le b. \]
A number of works \((^{1-5})\) are devoted to estimating the length of the interval \([a,b]\) on which problem (1)—(2) has a unique solution. The following are known: the Vallée-Poussin estimate \((^1)\)
\[ \sum_{l=1}^{n} L_k\frac{(b-a)^k}{k!}\le 1; \tag{3} \]
the estimate of A. Yu. Levin \((^2)\)
\[ \sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{L_k(b-a)^k}{2^k k\left[\frac{k-1}{2}\right]!\left[\frac{k}{2}\right]!}\le 1, \tag{4} \]
and, finally, Nehari’s integral estimate \((^3)\)
\[ \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\left(\frac{b-a}{2}\right)^k\int_a^b |p_{k+1}(t)|\,dt\le 2. \tag{5} \]
Let us note that, for a fixed value of \((b-a)\), conditions (3)—(5) express the requirement of smallness of the coefficients \(L_i\), or respectively
\[ \int_a^b |p_i(t)|\,dt,\qquad i=1,2,\ldots,n. \]
In the present paper each of the estimates (3)—(5) is sharpened. Conditions are obtained under which the coefficient \(p_1(t)\) may assume arbitrarily large values on the interval \([a,b]\) owing to the smallness of the remaining coefficients, something not allowed by inequalities (3)—(5).
Theorem 1. Problem (1)—(2), for arbitrary \(A_{i,k}\), has a unique solution on the interval \([a,b]\) if
\[ \sum_{k=2}^{n} L_k\frac{(b-a)^k}{k!}\exp\{L_1(b-a)\}\le 1. \tag{6} \]
Estimate (6) sharpens estimate (3). Indeed, let us rewrite (3) and (6), respectively, in the form
\[ \sum_{k=2}^{n} L_k\frac{(b-a)^k}{k!}\le 1-L_1(b-a), \tag{7} \]
\[ \sum_{k=2}^{n} L_k \frac{(b-a)^k}{k!} \leqslant \exp\{-L_1(b-a)\}. \tag{8} \]
The right-hand side of inequality (8), for any value of \((b-a)\), is greater than the right-hand side of inequality (7). Therefore inequality (6) determines a larger interval of solvability of problem (1)—(2) than inequality (3).
A consequence of Theorem 1 is the assertion that, for the equation
\[ x^{(n)}+p_1(t)x^{(n-1)}=0 \]
problem (1)—(2) is solvable on any interval \([a,b]\), where the function \(p_1(t)\) is continuous.
Theorem 2. Problem (1)—(2), for arbitrary \(A_{i,k}\), has a unique solution on the interval \([a,b]\), if
\[ \sum_{k=2}^{n} \frac{L_k(b-a)^k} {2^k k\left[\frac{k-1}{2}\right]!\left[\frac{k}{2}\right]!} \exp\left\{\frac{L_1}{2}(b-a)\right\} \leqslant 1. \tag{9} \]
Inequality (9) determines a larger interval of solvability of problem (1)—(2) than inequality (4).
Theorem 3. Problem (1)—(2), for arbitrary \(A_{ik}\), has a unique solution on the interval \([a,b]\), if
\[ \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \frac{(b-a)^k\int_a^b |p_{k+1}(t)|\,dt} {2^k k\left[\frac{k-1}{2}\right]!\left[\frac{k}{2}\right]!} \exp\left\{\frac{1}{2}\int_a^b |p_1(t)|\,dt\right\} \leqslant 2. \tag{10} \]
Inequality (10) is a strengthening of inequality (5).
Corollary. If a nontrivial solution of the equation
\[ x''+p_1(t)x'+p_2(t)x=0 \tag{11} \]
has two zeros on the interval \([a,b]\), then
\[ (b-a)\int_a^b |p_2(t)|\,dt \exp\left\{\frac{1}{2}\int_a^b |p_1(t)|\,dt\right\}>4. \tag{12} \]
If in equation (11) \(p_1(t)=0\), then inequality (12) passes into Lyapunov’s inequality
\[ (b-a)\int_a^b |p_2(t)|\,dt>4. \]
Therefore Theorem 3 may be regarded as a generalization of Lyapunov’s inequality for an equation of order \(n\).
In conclusion we give the proof of Theorem 3. Suppose the contrary: let inequality (10) hold and, at the same time, let some nontrivial solution \(x(t)\) of equation (1) have on the interval \([a,b]\) at least \(n\) zeros. Then on the interval \([a,b]\) there will be found a system of points
\[ a\leqslant a_1\leqslant a_2\leqslant \cdots \leqslant a_{n-1}\leqslant c\leqslant b_{n-1}\leqslant \cdots \leqslant b_1\leqslant b, \]
at which
\[ x(a_1)=x'(a_2)=\cdots=x^{(n-2)}(a_{n-1})=x^{(n-1)}(c)=\cdots=x(b_1)=0. \]
Let
\[ \sup_{a\leq t\leq c}|x^{(n-1)}(t)|=|x^{(n-1)}(\alpha)|=\mu \qquad (a\leqslant \alpha\leqslant c). \]
Then on the interval \([a,c]\) the estimate (2) holds:
\[ \left|x^{(n-k-1)}(t)\right| \leqslant \mu\, \frac{(c-a)^k} {k\left[\frac{k-1}{2}\right]!\left[\frac{k}{2}\right]!}, \qquad k=1,2,\ldots,n-1. \tag{13} \]
We rewrite equation (1) in the form
\[ \left\{x^{(n-1)}(t)\exp\left[\int^t p_1(\xi)\,d\xi\right]\right\}' = -\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}p_{k+1}(t)x^{(n-k-1)}(t) \exp\left[\int^t p_1(\xi)\,d\xi\right]. \]
Integrating this equation from \(a\) to \(c\) and applying estimate (13), we obtain the inequality
\[ 1< \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \frac{(c-a)^k\displaystyle\int_a^c |p_{k+1}(t)|\,dt} {k\left[\frac{k-1}{2}\right]!\left[\frac{k}{2}\right]!} \exp\int_a^c |p_1(\xi)|\,d\xi . \tag{14} \]
Similarly, for the interval \([c,b]\) we have
\[ 1< \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \frac{(b-c)^k\displaystyle\int_c^b |p_{k+1}(t)|\,dt} {k\left[\frac{k-1}{2}\right]!\left[\frac{k}{2}\right]!} \exp\int_c^b |p_1(\xi)|\,d\xi . \tag{15} \]
Denote the \(k\)-th term of the sums appearing on the right-hand sides of inequalities (14) and (15), respectively, by \(A_k^{1+k}\), \(B_k^{1+k}\), and introduce the quantity
\[ \chi=\frac12\int_a^b |p_1(t)|\,dt-\int_a^c |p_1(t)|\,dt . \]
Then
\[ \frac{\displaystyle\int_a^b |p_{k+1}(t)|\,dt} {k\left[\frac{k-1}{2}\right]!\left[\frac{k}{2}\right]!} \exp\left\{\frac12\int_a^b |p_1(t)|\,dt\right\} = \frac{\left[A_k\exp\frac{\chi}{1+k}\right]^{1+k}}{(c-a)^k} + \]
\[ + \frac{\left[B_k\exp\left(-\frac{\chi}{1+k}\right)\right]^{1+k}}{(b-c)^k} \ge \frac{\left[A_k\exp\frac{\chi}{1+k} + B_k\exp\left(-\frac{\chi}{1+k}\right)\right]^{1+k}}{(b-a)^k} \]
or
\[ \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \frac{(b-a)^k\displaystyle\int_a^b |p_{k+1}(t)|\,dt} {2^k k\left[\frac{k-1}{2}\right]!\left[\frac{k}{2}\right]!} \exp\left\{\frac12\int_a^b |p_1(t)|\,dt\right\} \ge \]
\[ \ge \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} 2^{-k} \left[ A_k\exp\frac{\chi}{1+k} + B_k\exp\left(-\frac{\chi}{1+k}\right) \right]^{1+k} >2 \tag{16} \]
under conditions (14) and (15), i.e., under the condition that
\[ \sum_{k=1}^{n-1}A_k^{1+k}>1, \qquad \sum_{k=1}^{n-1}B_k^{1+k}>1 . \]
Inequality (16) contradicts inequality (10). The theorem is proved.
Bauman Higher Technical School
Received
10 XII 1966
REFERENCES
- Ch. J. de la Vallée-Poussin, J. math. pures et appl., 9, No. 8, 125 (1929).
- A. Yu. Levin, Matem. sborn., 64, No. 3, 396 (1964).
- Z. Nehari, Studies in Mathematical Analysis and Related Topics, 1962, p. 256.
- A. Yu. Levin, DAN, 153, No. 6, 1257 (1963).
- G. A. Bessmertnykh, A. Yu. Levin, DAN, 144, No. 3, 471 (1962).