Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
MATHEMATICS
Submitted 1967-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-196701.75366 | Translated from Russian

Full Text

Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
1967. Volume 175, No. 1

UDC 517.54

MATHEMATICS

A. V. SYCHEV

ON SPATIAL QUASICONFORMAL MAPPINGS SATISFYING A HÖLDER CONDITION AT BOUNDARY POINTS

(Presented by Academician M. A. Lavrent'ev on 10 IX 1966)

In papers \((^3,^4,^6,^7)\) it was proved that every \(Q\)-quasiconformal mapping \((^2)\) of a domain \(D\) of three-dimensional Euclidean space \(R^3\) satisfies a Hölder condition on any closed subdomain \(\overline{D'}\), \(\overline{D'} \subset D\). In the present note the fulfillment of this condition is established for \(Q\)-quasiconformal mappings of certain classes of domains also at boundary points.

For a given set \(E \subset R^3\), \(\partial E\) denotes its boundary, \(\overline{E}\) its closure, \(m(E)\) the three-dimensional Lebesgue measure, and for given sets \(E_1, E_2 \subset R^3\), \(r(E_1,E_2)\) the distance between them. Further, for a finite point \(P\) and \(t>0\), \(B^3(P,t)\) denotes the ball \(|x-P|<t\), and \(S^2(P,t)\) its boundary sphere; if \(P=0\), the following abbreviations are also used:

\[ B^3(t)=B^3(0,t),\quad B^3=B^3(1),\quad S^2(t)=S^2(0,t),\quad S^2=S^2. \]

A bounded domain \(D\) is called a ring domain if it is homeomorphic to the domain enclosed between concentric spheres.

Let \(D\) be a ring domain; let \(B_0\) and \(B_1\) be its inner and outer boundary components; and let \(F_0 \subset B_0\) and \(F_1 \subset B_1\) be certain distinguished simply connected boundary continua.

We shall say that a curve \(\gamma \subset \overline{D}\) connects \(F_0\) and \(F_1\) in \(D\) if \(\gamma \cap F_0 \ne \varnothing\), \(\gamma \cap F_1 \ne \varnothing\), where \(\varnothing\) is the empty set. We shall also say that a surface \(\sigma \subset \overline{D}\) separates \(F_0\) and \(F_1\) in \(D\) if every curve connecting \(F_0\) and \(F_1\) in \(D\) intersects it in at least one point.

Lemma. Let \(\Sigma\) be a certain family of surfaces contained in the ball \(B^3\); let \(\Sigma^*\) be the image of \(\Sigma\) under the transformation \(y=x/|x|^2\), and let \(\Sigma_1\) be the family of surfaces \(\sigma_1=\sigma \cup \sigma^*\), \(\sigma\in\Sigma\), \(\sigma^*=y(\sigma)\in\Sigma^*\).
Then

\[ M(\Sigma)=\sqrt{2}\,M(\Sigma_1). \tag{1} \]

We shall say that a domain \(D\) is \(a\)-locally simply connected at the boundary point \(P\) if one can indicate an \(a>0\) such that \(\partial D \cap B^3(P,t)\) is simply connected for all \(t\le a\). If \(D\) is \(a\)-locally simply connected at every boundary point, then we shall say that it is \(a\)-locally simply connected on the boundary.

Theorem 1. Let \(y=f(x)\), \(f(0)=0\), be a \(Q\)-quasiconformal mapping of a bounded domain \(D\), \(a\)-locally simply connected at the point \(P\in\partial D\) \((a<R_0/2)\), onto the ball \(B^3\). Then for every point \(Q\in \overline{D}\cap B^3(P,a)\)

\[ |f(P)-f(Q)|<C|P-Q|^{1/K(Q)}, \tag{2} \]

where \(C=C(R_0,Q)\), \(K(Q)=Q\sqrt{2}\), \(R_0=r(0,\partial D)\).

Proof. In view of the \(a\)-local simple connectedness of the domain \(D\) at the point \(P\), for every point \(Q\in\overline{D}\cap B^3(P,a)\) there exists a curve \(\gamma_{P,Q}\), connecting \(P\) and \(Q\), such that: a) \(\gamma_{P,Q}-Q\subset \partial D\cap B^3(P,|P-Q|)\), if \(Q\in\partial D\); b) \(\gamma_{P,Q}-P-Q\subset D\cap B^3(P,|P-Q|)\), if \(Q\in D\).

Let \(Q_0\) be a point for which \(|Q_0|<R_0/2\). Denote
\(r=|Q_0|\), \(r^*=|f(Q_0)|\), \(\tilde r=|P-Q|\), \(\tilde r^*=|f(P)-f(Q)|\);
\(F_0=[0,Q_0]\), \(F_0^*=f(F_0)\), \(F_1=\gamma_{P,Q}\), \(F_1^*=f(F_1)\). Then
\(D-(F_0\cup F_1)\) and \(B^3-(F_0^*\cup F_1^*)\) are ring domains with boundary components
\(B_0=F_0\), \(B_1=\partial D\cup F_1\) and \(B_0^*=F_0^*\), \(B_1^*=S^2\cup F_1^*\), respectively. Let \(\Sigma\) and \(\Sigma^*\) be the families of surfaces separating \(F_0,F_1\) in \(D-(F_0\cup F_1)\) and \(F_0^*,F_1^*\) in \(B^3-(F_0^*\cup F_1^*)\).

By the \(Q\)-quasiconformality of \(f(x)\),

\[ M(\Sigma)\leq QM(\Sigma^*). \tag{3} \]

Using the known properties of moduli \((^1)\), Theorem 4 \((^5)\), and \((^1)\), we obtain the estimates

\[ M^*(\Sigma)<\frac{2}{2\sqrt{\pi}}\ln\frac{R_0^2}{2r\tilde r},\qquad M(\Sigma^*)<\frac{V^2}{2\sqrt{\pi}}\ln\frac{2\lambda^2}{r^* \tilde r^*},\qquad 4\leq\lambda\leq 1,2,4,\ldots, \]

whose substitution in (3) gives (2).

Corollary 1. The family \(\{f(x)\}\) of normalized \(Q\)-quasiconformal mappings of a bounded domain \(D\) with an \(a\)-locally simply connected boundary onto the ball \(B^3\) is equicontinuous in \(\overline D\).

Let \(y=\varphi(x)\) be a homeomorphism of the domain \(D\subset R^3\); we shall call \(\varphi(x)\) a \(C\)-isometry, \(1\leq C<\infty\) (a Lipschitz mapping with constant \(C\)), if

\[ C^{-1}|P_1-P_2|\leq |f(P_1)-f(P_2)|\leq C|P_1-P_2| \]

for all \(P_1,P_2\in D\).

We shall say that a domain \(D\ni 0\), homeomorphic to a ball, satisfies at the point \(P\in\partial D\) the condition \((a,C)\), if one can indicate a sufficiently small \(a>0\) such that: 1) there exists a \(C\)-isometry \(\varphi_P\) mapping \(D\cap B^3(P,a)\) onto a half-ball \(H\), under which \(\partial D\cap B^3(P,a)\) goes into the flat part \(\partial H\), and the point \(P\) goes to the center of \(H\); 2) the area of any surface separating \(S^2(a)\) and \(D\cap S^2(P,a)\) in \(D-\bigl(\overline{B^3(a)}\cup\overline{B^3(P,a)}\bigr)\) is not less than the area of \(D\cap S^2(P,a)\).

Theorem 2. Let \(y=f(x)\), \(f(0)=0\), be a \(Q\)-quasiconformal mapping of a bounded domain \(D\), homeomorphic to a ball, onto a bounded domain \(D^*\), and suppose that the domains \(D\) and \(D^*\), at the boundary points \(P\) and \(P^*=f(P)\), satisfy the condition \((a,C)\). Then for every point \(Q\in\overline D\), sufficiently close to \(P\),

\[ C_1|P-Q|^{K(C,Q)}<|f(P)-f(Q)|<C_2|P-Q|^{1/K(C,Q)}, \]

where
\(C_1=C_1(a,C,R_0,R_0^*,V,Q)\), \(C_2=C_2(a,C,R_0,R_0^*,V^*,Q)\),
\(K(C,Q)=C^2Q\sqrt{2}\), \(R_0=r(0,\partial D)\), \(R_0^*=r(0,\partial D^*)\),
\(V=m(D)\), \(V^*=m(D^*)\).

The proof of Theorem 2 is analogous to the proof of Theorem 1.

Corollary 2. The family \(\{f(x)\}\) of normalized \(Q\)-quasiconformal mappings of a bounded domain \(D\), homeomorphic to a ball and satisfying the condition \((a,C)\) on the boundary, onto a domain \(D^*\) of the same kind is equicontinuous in \(\overline D\).

Institute of Mathematics
Siberian Branch
Academy of Sciences of the USSR

Received
1 IX 1966

REFERENCES

  1. B. V. Shabat, DAN, 130, 1210 (1960).
  2. B. V. Shabat, DAN, 132, 1045 (1960).
  3. M. A. Kreines, Matem. sborn., 9 (51), 713 (1941).
  4. Yu. G. Reshetnyak, DAN, 130, 507 (1960).
  5. F. W. Gehring, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 101, No. 3, 499 (1961).
  6. F. W. Gehring, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 103, No. 3, 353 (1962).
  7. E. D. Callender, Pacific J. Math., 10, No. 2, 449 (1960).

Submission history

Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR