UDC 549.621.9+546.245
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
Submitted 1970-01-01 | RussiaRxiv: ru-197001.94352 | Translated from Russian

Abstract

Full Text

UDC 549.621.9+546.245

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY

B. V. MILL

NEW SERIES OF Te6+-CONTAINING GARNETS

(Presented by Academician N. V. Belov, July 17, 1969)

For hexavalent tellurium, as also for Sb5+, a strong preference for 6-coordination is characteristic in oxide compounds (1). Te-containing compounds are known with the spinel structure (2, 3), perovskite structure (4), etc. Recently, garnets of the type {A₃²⁺}[Te₂⁶⁺](B₃²⁺)O₁₂ were synthesized, where A = Ca, Cd and B = Zn, Co (5). It was shown by X-ray diffraction that the Te6+ ions (r = 0.56 Å*) in these compounds also have 6-coordination, displacing the considerably larger Zn2+ (0.74 Å) and Co2+ (0.72 Å) ions into tetrahedra. We studied the replacement in Te-garnets of divalent ions by mono- and trivalent ions.

The starting components of the charge were CaCO₃, Na₂CO₃, oxides of rare-earth elements Y₂O₃, Fe₂O₃, Al₂O₃, Sb₂O₃, (extra pure), Bi₂O₃, Ga₂O₃ (analytical grade), and TeO₂ (pure). The pressed mixtures were slowly heated (3–5 h) in air and held at the specified temperature for 5–10 h. During the process

Table 1

Conditions of preparation and characteristics of garnets {A₃}[Te₂⁶⁺](B₃)O₁₂

Composition Stability range, °C Lattice constant, a₀, Å X-ray density, g/cm³ Powder color
Na₃Te₂Fe₃O₁₂ 725–775* 12.386 ± 3 4.778 Brick-red
Na₃Te₂Ga₃O₁₂ 750–800 12.358 ± 3 5.104 White
Na₃Te₂Al₃O₁₂ 700–800* 12.188 ± 4 4.247 Same
Pr₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 750–1150 12.606 ± 2 5.906 Light green
Nd₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 700–1100 12.556 ± 2 6.046 Lilac
Sm₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 700–1100 12.465 ± 2 6.302 Light cream
Eu₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 700–1100 12.427 ± 2 6.393 White
Gd₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 750–1100 12.391 ± 2 6.560 Same
Tb₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 750–1050 12.346 ± 2 6.667 » »
Dy₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 700–1050 12.307 ± 2 6.807 » »
Ho₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 700–1050 12.271 ± 2 6.930 Yellow
Er₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 750–1000 12.236 ± 2 7.030 Pink
Tu₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 750–975 12.204 ± 2 7.122 White
Yb₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 700–975 12.173 ± 2 7.267 Same
Lu₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 750 12.150 ± 2 7.352 » »
Y₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 750–1050 12.267 ± 2 5.286 » »
Bi₃Te₂Li₃O₁₂ 700 12.600 ± 3 7.269 » »
CaGd₂Sb₂Zn₃O₁₂ 1150–1250 12.623 ± 2 6.511 » »
Ca₃Te₂Zn₃O₁₂ 750–1150 12.579 ± 2 5.094 » »
12.58 (5)

* The garnet is not single-phase.

upon heating, Te4+ and Sb3+ were oxidized to Te6+ and Sb5+. The sintered samples were studied for phase composition (URS-50IM diffractometer, CoKα radiation), and the lattice constant was determined. Table 1 gives the temperature ranges for the synthesis of single-phase ceramic garnets. At tempera-

* Ions occupying the c-, a-, and d-positions in the structure, with coordination numbers 8, 6, and 4, respectively, are enclosed in braces, square brackets, and parentheses.
** Ionic radii according to Ahrens for coordination number 6.

at 25–50° above the upper boundary of the synthesis region, the garnets are unstable and decompose. It is possible that the true decomposition limits of a number of garnets lie somewhat lower, and that decomposition of the garnets would be observed upon increasing the duration of the experiments.

Upon substitution according to the scheme (A^{2+} + B^{2+} \to Na^+ + B^{3+}), garnets of the type ({Na_3}Te_2O_{12}) with (B = Fe, Ga, Al) were obtained. Since 4-coordination for (Fe^{3+}), (Ga^{3+}), and (Al^{3+}) in the garnet structure presents no difficulties, there is no reason to suppose that the distribution differs from that given. Low decomposition temperatures (800–825°) and comparatively narrow temperature regions of synthesis are characteristic of Na garnets. (Na_3Te_2Fe_3O_{12}) and (Na_3Te_2Al_3O_{12}) could not be obtained completely single-phase.

(Li^+) is the only monovalent ion that can occupy (d)-positions in the garnet structure (cryolithionite ({Na_3}[Al_2]\cdot(Li_3)F_{12}) and its analogues ((^6))). In our case, paired with (Li^+(d)), rare-earth ions from (Pr^{3+}) to (Lu^{3+}), as well as (Y^{3+}) and (Bi^{3+}), enter the (c)-positions, forming garnets of the type ({Ln_3^{3+}}\cdotTe_2O_{12}). In these garnets (Te^{6+}) also must occupy the (a)-positions. The 6-coordination of (Te^{6+}) ions is confirmed by the fact that, from a mixture corresponding to the composition (Na_2CaLi_2Te_3O_{12}), a garnet (with (1/3) of the tellurium in tetrahedra) is not formed. Thus, we have the first example of 4-coordination of (Li^+) in the structure of oxide garnets. In known Li-containing oxygen garnets (Li^+) occupies (a)-positions ((^7)).

Fig. 1. Lattice constants (a_0) as a function of the atomic number of (Ln^{3+}), (N), for garnets: 1 — (Ln_3Ga_5O_{12}) ((^7)), 2 — (Ln_3Te_2Li_3O_{12})

Fig. 1. Lattice constants (a_0) as a function of the atomic number of (Ln^{3+}), (N), for garnets:
1 — (Ln_3Ga_5O_{12}) ((^7)), 2 — (Ln_3Te_2Li_3O_{12})

(Bi_3Te_2Li_3O_{12}) is the first garnet in which all (c)-positions are occupied by (Bi^{3+}) ions. In the system (Y_{3-x}Bi_xFe_5O_{12}), (x_{\max}=1.5), and extrapolation gives for the hypothetical (Bi_3Fe_5O_{12}) a lattice constant (a_0 = 12.621) Å ((^8)), located approximately midway between the values of the parameters of the hypothetical garnets (Pr_3Fe_5O_{12}) (12.646 Å) and (Nd_3Fe_5O_{12}) (12.600 Å) ((^9)). In Te—Li garnets, (Bi^{3+}) is much closer in size to (Pr^{3+}) than to (Nd^{3+}), although the difference between the parameters of the Pr and Nd garnets (0.050 Å) is practically the same as for ferrite garnets (0.046 Å).

Most Te—Li garnets can be obtained single-phase over a wide temperature interval. In the series of rare-earth garnets (including yttrium), the decomposition temperatures decrease with decreasing size of the (c)-ions. Of the rare-earth garnets, only the lutetium garnet cannot be obtained single-phase in experiments of short duration; however, when the synthesis time is increased to 20 h (750°), the (Lu_3Te_2Li_3O_{12}) ceramic is practically single-phase. (Bi_3Te_2Li_3O_{12}), in accordance with the low melting temperature of (Bi_2O_3) (825°), is more low-temperature and decomposes already at 750°.

It is interesting to compare the isomorphous capacity of Te—Li and Ga garnets ((Ln_3Ga_5O_{12})), which have similar lattice constants (Fig. 1). In ((^{10})) we emphasized the great influence of the strength of metal—oxygen bonds in the tetrahedral sites of the lattice on the isomorphous capacity and ease of formation of garnets. The strength of the (Li^+—O^{2-}) bonds is considerably less than that of (Ga^{3+}—O^{2-}), i.e., the structure of Te—Li garnets is more flexible. Therefore, although the tetrahedral voids in Te—Li garnets are occupied by larger ions ((r_{Li^+}=0.68) Å) than the octahedral ones, which is unfavorable from the spatial point of view, the isomorphous capacity with respect to rare-earth elements of both types of garnets is the same.

In the series of Te—Li garnets the parameter increases with increasing size of Ln$^{3+}$ faster than in other known types of rare-earth garnets (Ln$3$Fe$_5$O$$, Ln$3$Ga$_5$O$$, Ln$3$Al$_5$O$$ ($^7$), Ln$3$Co$$Ge${2.5}$O$$).}$ ($^{11}$)) (see Fig. 1). Since the Li$^+$—O$^{2-}$ bonds are weak and the structure is flexible, the rare-earth ions occupy the $c$-positions “comfortably”: the larger Ln$^{3+}$ ions push apart the O$^{2-}$ ions, increasing the volume of the dodecahedra, whereas the smaller ions, conversely, contract the dodecahedra. In the flexibility of their structure the Te—Li garnets approach hydrogarnets, in which, for example, large Sr$^{2+}$ ions ($c$) and small Al$^{3+}$ ions ($a$) can “coexist”—a combination impossible for anhydrous garnets ($^{10

It is probably from the viewpoints set forth above that one can explain the fact that Bi$3$Te$_2$Li$_3$O$$, whereas in the more rigid lattice of Ga garnets such matching is no longer realized.}$ exists and its Ga analogue is absent. The pliability of the lattice makes it possible to adapt the shape and dimensions of the dodecahedra to the crystallochemical individuality of Bi$^{3+

Garnets of the type ${A_3^{2+}}\mathrm{Te}_2\mathrm{O}{12}$ are formed because the tetrahedra contain large, low-charged Zn$^{2+}$ ions (0.74 Å), i.e., the metal—oxygen bonds are weakened. However, the structure obtained is strained and the isomorphous capacity is small. Only Ca$^{2+}$ (0.99 Å) and Cd$^{2+}$ (0.97 Å) enter the $c$-positions, but with Sr$^{2+}$ (1.12 Å) a garnet is not formed. More than half of Zn$^{2+}$ can be replaced by Co$^{2+}$ (0.72 Å), but with Co$^{2+}$ alone (and likewise with Ni$^{2+}$ (0.69 Å) and Mg$^{2+}$ (0.66 Å)) a garnet is not formed. The author did not succeed in obtaining garnets of the type Ln$_3^{3+}$Te$$M$}^{5{1/5}^{2+}$O$$ (0.35 Å) in the $d$-positions was unsuccessful with A = Ca, Cd, Mg.}$ (M = Zn, Co). An attempt to synthesize garnets with Be$^{2+

One more new garnet with Zn$^{2+}$($d$) can be obtained by blocking the $a$-positions with Sb$^{5+}$ ions—${\mathrm{CaGd}2}\mathrm{Sb}_2\mathrm{O}$ a similar garnet is not formed.}$. With Co$^{2+

For several Te garnets a chemical analysis for tellurium was performed (analyst S. A. Malyutin). The analysis showed the absence of Te$^{4+}$ and a content of Te$^{6+}$ in Ca$3$Te$_2$Zn$_3$O$$ of 33.87 wt.% (calculated 33.42), in Gd$3$Te$_2$Li$_3$O$$ of 27.60% (calculated 27.16%), and in Y$3$Te$_2$Li$_3$O$$ of 34.59% (calculated 34.73%). According to V. I. Sokolov’s data, in Yb$3$Te$_2$Li$_3$O$$ and Er$3$Te$_2$Li$_3$O$$ no magnetic ordering is observed above 1.5°K. Apparently, the Néel points of Te—Li garnets, as also of rare-earth Ga garnets, are located below 1.5°K.

The author expresses his gratitude to S. A. Malyutin and V. I. Sokolov for their assistance in the work.

Note added in proof. Substitution by mono- and trivalent ions only in the $c$- and $d$-positions is also possible. Garnets ${\mathrm{Na}{1.5}\mathrm{Gd}}\mathrm{Te}_2\mathrm{O}{12}$ and ${\mathrm{Ca}_3}\mathrm{Te}_2\mathrm{O}$ were synthesized at 800 and 900° respectively and have parameters $12.606 \pm 0.005$ Å and $12.468 \pm 0.002$ Å.

Moscow State University
named after M. V. Lomonosov

Received
15 VII 1969

REFERENCES

$^1$ J. Zemann, Chem. Zvesti, 19, 236 (1965).
$^2$ G. Bayer, J. Less-Common Metals, 12, 4, 326 (1967).
$^3$ H. Kasper, Zs. anorg. u. allgem. Chem., 354, 1/2, 78 (1967).
$^4$ G. Bayer, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 46, 604 (1963).
$^5$ H. Kasper, Mater. Res. Bull., 39, 765 (1968).
$^6$ R. de Pape, J. Portier et al., C. R., 265C, 22, 1244 (1967).
$^7$ S. Geller, Zs. Kristallogr., 125, 1 (1967).
$^8$ S. Geller, H. J. Williams et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 3, 2, 26 (1963).
$^9$ G. P. Espinosa, J. Chem. Phys., 37, 10, 2344 (1962).
$^{10}$ B. V. Mill, Zhurn. neorg. mater., 5, 9, 1604 (1969).
$^{11}$ K. P. Belov, B. V. Mill, V. I. Sokolov, T. D. Hien, ZhETF, 57, 369 (1969).

Submission history

UDC 549.621.9+546.245